It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by hooper
You must of linked the wrong PDF. That was the ATC recordings. Doesn't do anything to explain how the plane allegedly crashed.
Originally posted by earthdude
I'm going with the wrong spot theory. The real crash site was over several miles and this site was just to distract people while they cleaned up the bullet ridden wreakage.
Originally posted by hooper
Check it again, I changed the link.
Also, we are well beyond the "allegedly" phase. The plane did crash. You are making the allegations that the plane did not crash.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
Check it again, I changed the link.
If I'm reading that PDF right, the best it does is give a graph of how the alleged plane came in to the point where it hit the ground. Guess I'm more wanting to know what happened after that point. Plus, since I can't read the graphs, can you please tell me the behavior of the plane from Rollock scrap yard (funny the closest business from the alleged crash site that just basically left small scrap metal parts was a scrap metal business!) until it touched the ground?
Also, we are well beyond the "allegedly" phase. The plane did crash. You are making the allegations that the plane did not crash.
Oh, well, thanks for clearing that up.
Originally posted by earthdude
This flight data is different than the flight data I read 2 years ago. I smell coverup. The original flight data showed much more altitude and speed changes.
If I'm reading that PDF right, the best it does is give a graph of how the alleged plane came in to the point where it hit the ground.
Guess I'm more wanting to know what happened after that point.
Plus, since I can't read the graphs, can you please tell me the behavior of the plane from Rollock scrap yard (funny the closest business from the alleged crash site that just basically left small scrap metal parts was a scrap metal business!) until it touched the ground?
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by waypastvne
How was there even an explosion at Shanksville (officially speaking)?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by waypastvne
How was there even an explosion at Shanksville (officially speaking)?
CnH2n+2 + (n+1)/2 O2 => n C + (n + 1) H2O
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by ATH911
reply to post by waypastvne
How was there even an explosion at Shanksville (officially speaking)?
CnH2n+2 + (n+1)/2 O2 => n C + (n + 1) H2O
You're unable to explain along with hooper, gotcha.
Originally posted by hooper
Alleged? Unless you have direct evidence to the contrary there is no "alleged". Thought we got that clear.
The burden is on you to prove your allegation - that no plane crashed and so far, no good.
Well, I can't find any "official story" so I guess your out of luck. Another dead end.
Now, you are more than welcome to either provide an official souce for your story, you know - FAA, NTSB, FBI or any other governmental body that is specifically tasked with providing an official descriprition of the information you're looking for, or you may do like you have been doing and argue with your own speculations.
Nope. You want official - you got official. You figure it out and then tell all of us why a plane hitting the ground at over 500 mph can't explode.
Originally posted by waypastvne
reply to post by ATH911
That is the correct answer to the question you asked me. You don't understand chemistry ?
Originally posted by hooper
Do you understand why when a plane full of fuel hits the earth a a high rate of speed why it explodes or do you need someone to explain combustion?
Like when plane mostly stays above ground and doesn't bury? Yes, I understand how that would cause the plane to explode.
I just don't understand how UA93 could have the way I interpret how it was said to have crashed.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by waypastvne
reply to post by ATH911
That is the correct answer to the question you asked me. You don't understand chemistry ?
No, please explain it for the laymen.
Originally posted by hooper
Well, here's one for you - the plane didn't explode.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Jet fuel is a hydro-carbon fuel when mixed with oxygen and its temperature raised above flash point the hydrogen - carbon molecule splits and and merges with the oxygen to form carbon-monoxide and dihydrogen-monoxide.
This releases energy.
Thats about as layman as I can put it.
Originally posted by ATH911
Originally posted by hooper
Well, here's one for you - the plane didn't explode.
Sweet, you agree with me!
Originally posted by ATH911
So, how could it have done that without contradicting the official story?