It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
My hermaneutic approach is one of a literalist.
Your response to my quote of 1 Timothy tells me you are a Oneness believer who rationalizes the use of the word trinity as a cover for your heresy, which is in line with the deceptive practices of your cult.
I'm not a Gnostic, I reject completely doeticism. Christ was fully man when He walked the Earth. He was also fully God the Son. He added humanity to His Divinity.
That's what I tell people all the time.
So you believe that God basically decided to bitch-slap hundreds of billions of his followers and then allow a few million a free pass and a life of luxury.
Then you limit it by saying it must conform to this church teaching.
The Holy Spirit is the key to diciphering the bible correctly.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Then you limit it by saying it must conform to this church teaching.
The Holy Spirit is the key to diciphering the bible correctly.
If you were in fact interpreting Revelation literally, you would understand that the Word of God is The Word of God, and not through so many figurative twists turns into a literal person when it is not.
F.Y.I. JM hates the literal reading of the Biblical text. I must warn you if you continue to apply a literal reading to your posts here you run the risk of being labeled a "cult" member.
If you are in fact a literal interpreter of Revelation then you should see a literal lamb running around heaven with multiple sets of eyes and with its throat cut and covered in its own blood.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
Who is "the Lamb"?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
If you are in fact a literal interpreter of Revelation then you should see a literal lamb running around heaven with multiple sets of eyes and with its throat cut and covered in its own blood.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by jmdewey60
Who is "the Lamb"?
I'm not sure but I would use my own law of interpreting Revelation which is that it is always talking to the same people and is always talking about the same people, so that would make the lamb the persecuted church.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Your response to my quote of 1 Timothy tells me you are a Oneness believer who rationalizes the use of the word trinity as a cover for your heresy, which is in line with the deceptive practices of your cult.
I'm not a Gnostic, I reject completely doeticism. Christ was fully man when He walked the Earth. He was also fully God the Son. He added humanity to His Divinity.
You still end up with the same result which is a Jesus who could not fail, being the Holy God Almighty. You just arrive at it by a different route, one of course not supported by the Bible.
Originally posted by DISRAELI
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
My hermaneutic approach is one of a literalist.
Just out of curiosity, what is your understanding of the passage in John ch4 when Jesus tells his disciples that he is sending them out into the harvest?
Absolutely literal, I take it?
Now this is his commandment: that we believe in the name of his Son Jesus Christ and love one another. . .
Jesus (Not His real Name). . .
I am saying it is being referred to as the slain lamb in the book of Revelation and if it is not referred to in that way in other books then so what?
Who did John the Baptist say was "the lamb"? And the persecuted church has never been referred to as "the Lamb" of God.
Try again, tell me who "the Lamb" is. Sunday school children can answer this one.
A literalist is one who believes that Israel is actually the country in Palestine calling itself by that name, and not the inheritors of the promises to Abraham which would be the Christians, so it is only a narrow bit of verses that are taken literally and are the ones with the name Israel in them.
A "literalist" doesn't mean that one denies the Spirit uses figures of speech. Come on, that was a facetious question.
OK, you deny a label but you do not deny the rest, which is your belief that Jesus never gave up being fully God while the Bible says otherwise in no uncertain terms.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
Your response to my quote of 1 Timothy tells me you are a Oneness believer who rationalizes the use of the word trinity as a cover for your heresy, which is in line with the deceptive practices of your cult.
I'm not a Gnostic, I reject completely doeticism. Christ was fully man when He walked the Earth. He was also fully God the Son. He added humanity to His Divinity.
You still end up with the same result which is a Jesus who could not fail, being the Holy God Almighty. You just arrive at it by a different route, one of course not supported by the Bible.
Nope, I don't subscribe to "Oneness" doctrine. The Father, the Son, and the Spirit are seperate persons of the Godhead.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
I am saying it is being referred to as the slain lamb in the book of Revelation and if it is not referred to in that way in other books then so what?
Who did John the Baptist say was "the lamb"? And the persecuted church has never been referred to as "the Lamb" of God.
Try again, tell me who "the Lamb" is. Sunday school children can answer this one.
I already gave you my answer so don't keep asking me the same question over and over.
I am not one of your Sunday School pupils being indoctrinated into your cult.
John did not say that Jesus was the slain lamb who was to take a scroll from the one seated on the throne.
"He had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God sent out into all the earth."
This sounds like an allusion back to the earlier mention of the seven lamp-stands and the seven churches, which would be the practical application of something being sent off into the earth.
Saying with a loud voice, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing." ~ Revelation 5:12
The next day he saw Jesus coming toward him, and said, "Behold, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world! ~ John 1:29
And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world. ~ Revelation 13:8
If you don't like it I would guess that it has to do with your interpretation of a war against the Lamb and you wanting to make Jesus a killer so you can promote your cult's approval of war in the here and now to kill Muslims for the sake of the modern regime in Palestine calling itself Israel.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
OK, you deny a label but you do not deny the rest, which is your belief that Jesus never gave up being fully God while the Bible says otherwise in no uncertain terms.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Nope, I don't subscribe to "Oneness" doctrine. The Father, the Son, and the Spirit are seperate persons of the Godhead.