It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Geologists have long puzzled over anecdotal reports of strange atmospheric phenomena in the days before big earthquakes. But good data to back up these stories has been hard to come by.
In recent years, however, various teams have set up atmospheric monitoring stations in earthquake zones and a number of satellites are capable of sending back data about the state of the upper atmosphere and the ionosphere during an earthquake.
These kinds of observations are consistent with an idea called the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling mechanism. The thinking is that in the days before an earthquake, the great stresses in a fault as it is about to give cause the releases large amounts of radon.
The radioactivity from this gas ionises the air on a large scale and this has a number of knock on effects. Since water molecules are attracted to ions in the air, ionisation triggers the large scale condensation of water.
Originally posted by sprocket2cog
This one has already been posted mate.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
sorry you missed it by about 30 mins
Originally posted by jude11
Cornell Univ. Weighs in:
arXiv is an openly accessible, moderated repository for scholarly papers in specific scientific disciplines. Material submitted to arXiv is expected to be of interest, relevance, and value to those disciplines. Endorsement is a necessary but not sufficient condition to have papers accepted in arXiv; arXiv reserves the right to reject or reclassify any submission.
No authors of 1105.2841 can endorse.
Atmosphere-Ionosphere Response to the M9 Tohoku Earthquake Revealed by Joined Satellite and Ground Observations. Preliminary results
Dimitar Ouzounov: Is registered as an author of this paper.
Not currently an endorser. (why?)
Sergey Pulinets, Alexey Romanov, Alexander Romanov, Konstantin Tsybulya, Dimitri Davidenko, Menas Kafatos and Patrick Taylor are not registered as owners of this paper. (why?)
...... Man you guys are fast!
Originally posted by sprocket2cog
...... Man you guys are fast!
thats why you love us lol
only joking, its all good mate, just trying to keep all the response in one thread so its easier to follow all the haarping..
sorry had to throw that one in there as well.
Originally posted by jude11
What I find intriguing is the reference to 'Rapidly' heating up. This would seem to go against the current theories of HAARP being used as it has been suggested that it would take a slow build up of days in order to trigger.
Originally posted by User8911
Originally posted by jude11
What I find intriguing is the reference to 'Rapidly' heating up. This would seem to go against the current theories of HAARP being used as it has been suggested that it would take a slow build up of days in order to trigger.
I don't know about the theories but I never even taught HAARP needed days in order to make an earthquake, I would say hours MAX.
I'm still 90% sure this earthquake was done with HAARP
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by chaeone86
Nothing in the paper suggests that the earthquake was caused by geomagnetic activity or HAARP. The paper is about a search for natural precursors to earthquakes. Precursors caused by early seismic activity.
According to the charts, the temperature anomaly was not directly over the epicenter, it was centered about 150 miles north of it. The temperature anomaly originated in the lower atmosphere. HAARP affects the ionosphere, 10's of miles above. The radio frequencies used by HAARP cannot heat liquids above or below the surface of the Earth.
edit on 5/18/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by jude11
The more closely I look at the data presented the less impressed I am. They seem to ignore similar (though less strong) temperature anomalies in the area. They also seem to ignore an increase in solar proton flux (known to affect TEC) which occurred at the same time as the TEC "precursor".
Hopefully they will publish a peer reviewed version of the paper. I'm starting to think that this is a coincidence of "noise" with the earthquake.
edit on 5/18/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by indigothefish
reply to post by jude11
where are there real time images like this of the atmosphere over america
obviously we should be watching for this to happen around the new madrid as a warning sign