It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lysergic
Oh is it? Sure he was taken seriously until he started his whole greedy money grab
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by The Shrike
And for all of those replying that their opinion is that Greer and co. were invited to sit with Woolsey and co., it is stated in the letter that they were seated together. It doesn't say they were invited together. When you're invited to a dinner you may not have any idea who you're going to be seating next to.
And to the same people, keep in mind the recent news of a couple inviting themselves to the White House and they were photographed with the POTUS.
When someone says "None of this is accurate" it's just a polite way of saying "You lied" as others with a better understanding of the intent have pointed out.
Greer claims that it was intended to be a briefing all along and the whole "dinner" thing was a cover story.
Woolsey ADMITS to having dinner with Greer but says they just happened to be seated together at a dinner party.
Well, gee, whose story makes more sense? If anything, it seems more like Woolsey is lying.
As for "understanding the intent", I understand it very well. The intent was to publicly deny that Greer briefed Woolsey and publicly distance themselves from Greer. Because Greer was not discrete about the meeting but instead went all around the country loudly bragging about it at lectures and writing about it in his books, etc etc.
Originally posted by Pimander
(snip)
This is what I mean. This is off topic but an example of refusing to engage with what is being discussed. The meeting still happened. Greer was obviously taken seriously in important circles to be even sat at the table...
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by Pimander
You echo my comments earlier in the thread. There are hugely important whistle blowers whose stories are ignored. Where are you Greer?
Not here, that's for sure!
Don't worry about him though. The whole "Disclosure" movement is progressing nicely, whether people think Greer is credible or not. There was the big UFO press conference on CNN, there are major announcements on the "Free Energy" front regularly, there are major grassroots movements to root out all the corruption in governments and restore constitutional law, etc etc.
In fact, there's SO much happening right now, that I don't really understand the need to go back to Greer stuff from 10 years ago...?
Originally posted by cupocoffee
reply to post by The Shrike
Have you actually read any of his books or briefing documents?
In fact he has quite a lot of documents and information.
Again, moth picture and all the other silliness aside, the man did somehow manage to get access to a whole tonne of government documents and things. That is fact - they're in his first two books.
Originally posted by The Shrike
I wish I could dream like you! "Major grassroots movements to root out all the corruption in governments..."? Only if the natives storm the bastille is there a possibility of the present (and future) U.S. gov't being replaced by a gov't better tuned to the peoples' needs.
Originally posted by The Shrike
I'll be honest with you, I have not read any of his books or briefing documents. But I have seen the videos, I have read extensively about him and everybody comes to the same conclusions about him. Even here he is not liked or respected except by a few who are "blind" and think he's the cat's pajamas or the cat's meow.
Originally posted by The Shrike
Where does anyone get idea that Greer has the knowledge to debrief anyone? He's just a guy who's interested in UFOs, alleged aliens, UFO information and that's it.
Originally posted by The ShrikeWhat person of authority would waste their time on this flake?
Originally posted by The ShrikeGreer "debrief" Woolsey? Give me a break.
Originally posted by The Shrike
I'm one of those who doesn't accept claims that the U.S. and other governments have secret data about UFOs and aliens. No one anywhere acts as if they're keeping such secrets
Originally posted by splint
If anything, this gives Greer more credit.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Don't worry about him though. The whole "Disclosure" movement is progressing nicely...
Originally posted by Schaden
Originally posted by The Shrike
Originally posted by The ShrikeWhat person of authority would waste their time on this flake?
Apparently the director of the defense intelligence agency had time for him. Greer claims he had the reality of ET visitations confirmed to him. Edgar Mitchell was there also, and backed up Greer's claim.
Mitchell asked Greer to stop using his name with the Disclosure Project.
Greer is a phony. I have been following this guy for years. He makes wild and exaggerated claims and can't provide the evidence to back up said claims when confronted,
Claims such as simple dinner party being suddenly transformed into an important "Briefing" with the Head of the CIA. But he somehow leaves out the context of the dinner party/social aspect which tends to impress upon the more gullible people that this was big important meeting rather than a social event. For Wooslsey and three other people who were there to send that letter calls Greer's integrity out big time.
Originally posted by Facefirst
Claims such as simple dinner party being suddenly transformed into an important "Briefing" with the Head of the CIA. But he somehow leaves out the context of the dinner party/social aspect which tends to impress upon the more gullible people that this was big important meeting rather than a social event. For Wooslsey and three other people who were there to send that letter calls Greer's integrity out big time.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
What do you mean by "consistently wrong"?
"It is time for the truth to be brought out in open Congressional hearings. Behind the scenes high ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about the UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe the unknown flying objects are nonsense."
Admiral Hillenkoetter-the first Director of the CIA, 1947-50.
February 27, 1960.
"Maximum security exists concerning the subject of UFOs."
CIA Director, Allen Dulles, 1955.
"The Central Intelligence Agency has reviewed the current situation concerning unidentified flying objects which have created extensive speculation in the press and have been the subject of concern to Government organizations... Since 1947, approximately 2,000 official reports of sightings have been received and of these, about 20% are as yet unexplained."
"It is my view that this situation has possible implications for our national security which transcend the interests of a single service. A broader, coordinated effort should be initiated to develop a firm scientific understanding of the several phenomena which apparently are involved in these reports..." (1952 memorandum to the National Security Council.)
General Walter Bedell Smith, Director of the CIA from 1950-53
"Sightings of unexplained objects at great altitude and traveling at high speeds in the vicinity of major US defense installations are of such nature that they are not attributable to natural phenomena or known types of aerial vehicles."
Dr .H Marshall Chadwell, former assistant director of the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence, in a December, 1952 memo to then-director of the CIA, General Walter B. Smith
link
Originally posted by WingedBull
Name one thing Greer has been right about. Simple as that. Not something that has to be twisted, stretched and looked at sideways but something that is irrevocably right.
Originally posted by cupocoffee
Originally posted by Facefirst
Claims such as simple dinner party being suddenly transformed into an important "Briefing" with the Head of the CIA. But he somehow leaves out the context of the dinner party/social aspect which tends to impress upon the more gullible people that this was big important meeting rather than a social event. For Wooslsey and three other people who were there to send that letter calls Greer's integrity out big time.
Okay, so what was the context of the "dinner party" then? What was the social event? What was the purpose of it? When was it? Where was it? Who organized and hosted it? Who else was there?
See, all the critics and debunkers always go "of course it was just a dinner party. Greer and Woolsey just happened to be seated together at it" - and yet they can never provide any more information about that dinner party. What was the purpose of the dinner party? Who hosted it? Why were Greer and Woolsey both there?
Until you can provide us more information about this supposed "dinner party", I say the "dinner party" is the lie/cover story and Greer's story of the private briefing is the truth....
Originally posted by Facefirst
I still can't believe people will stick up for Greer.
Why were Greer and Woosley both there? It was a social visit. Woosley and three other people who were there said so. I've been to many dinners with people I've never met before. Bet you've been too.
The burden of proof is upon Greer, not me.
I'm not the one making the claims and why did Former NASA Astronaut Edgar Mitchell ask to have his name removed from anything to do with Greer's Disclosure Project?
That letter Woosley sent has four people essentially calling Greer a liar.
Greer has done this other times. He went around saying a few years back that he was in the process of securing an actual Zero Point energy device, which would have been monumental if true. It wasn't. He suddenly went quiet about it and gave some dramatic explanation that made little to no sense.
There are entire threads dedicated to exposing this guy for the drama-queen fraud he is. Just do a search.