It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Owing to the rapidly growing and inefficient usage of fuel, air pollution has increased in Istanbul. The levels are affected by the weak dispersion conditions in the city. The strength of the inversion can be explained by the temperature difference between the top and bottom boundaries and their height. In this study, nighttime surface inversion heights have been found to range between 84 m and 419 m. The mean height of the inversions was found to be less than 300 m in winter months. This behaviour indicates a poor ventilation and high pollution potential in the city.
Originally posted by fleabit
Just because the leech of UFOlogy, who comes into any case and sucks the life out of it, is interested in this case, shouldn't bring suspicion to it.
It's a real pity when cases with some merit and actual evidence, are muddied and given a bad name by association with this guy. But just because HE is trying to cash in or get his name involved in the case, shouldn't take away from the case itself imo.
Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by fleabit
Just because the leech of UFOlogy, who comes into any case and sucks the life out of it, is interested in this case, shouldn't bring suspicion to it.
It's a real pity when cases with some merit and actual evidence, are muddied and given a bad name by association with this guy. But just because HE is trying to cash in or get his name involved in the case, shouldn't take away from the case itself imo.
Fleabit.....
I wonder if it would be better if Maussan, etc...can keep us believing in such cases, even when THEY know what is going on......
.....better for their bank accounts, I mean..... :shk:
Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not
Originally posted by internos
About Maussan's reliability i'd say that he has some issues to say the least: he should never be takens seriously, IMHO.
Some Maussan's claims and facts:
- CLAIM: Maussan claims the photo below was the best photo ever taken of a giant UFO in space.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1da75ce2f1ef.jpg[/atsimg]
FACT: The photo appearing in the October 6, 1997 issue of "Contacto Ovni Magazine" is actually that of a galaxy forming, not a UFO.
- CLAIM: Maussan claims 'Dr.Reed' UFO case is real and scientific evidence supports it. Maussan claims his alleged intelligence contacts within the military warned him that the case is real and very dangerous. Maussan takes 'Dr.Reed' on a national speaking tour of Mexico and creates a media campaign to promote the case. These speaking engagements sell out at many locations.
FACT: 'Dr.Reed' and his entire case have been exposed as a fraud. Maussan is challenged to produce his alleged scientific evidence and fails. Maussan and associates claim to have thoroughly investigated 'Dr.Reed' and to have established his claims, evidence, and witnesses. Claims of an alleged alien device being of extraterrestrial origin are never proven in spite of Maussan claiming the bunk device utilized advanced nano-technology. Not a grain of proof is ever forthcoming from Maussan to back any of his claims.
- CLAIM: Maussan was saying that UFO video shot from a helicopter in New York City was real and had been analyzed.
FACT: Video was a hoax produced by the Sci-Fi Channel.
- CLAIM: Publicly stated it had been confirmed that the comet Hale-Bopp was bringing giant motherships to evacuate the planet.
FACT: No mother ships, planet still here along with population. Hale-Bopp UFO hoax exposed as a fraud by Jeff Rense.
- CLAIM: Maussan said he had radar tapes confirming presence of UFOs in Mexico's airspace.
FACT: To date, no such evidence has been brought forward.
- CLAIM: Maussan claims that he investigated a case where an airliner collided with a UFO in Mexico. Also claimed that "tons" of evidence and documents supported the case.
FACT: No evidence was ever produced.
- CLAIM: Promoted alleged alien photo as being real and impossible to replicate.
FACT: Photo was easily replicated. Maussan, in spite of being told it was fake prior to the story running at Rense.com, insisted the photo was genuine even after being told it was a fake.
- CLAIM: Maussan said there were gigantic UFO motherships orbiting the planet disguised as stars.
FACT: When asked for proof, Maussan exclaimed that was why the stars in the night sky moved - because they were UFOs!
See also
- JAIME MAUSSAN: DAMAGING SERIOUS UFOLOGY ONE HOAX AT A TIME
- AEROMEXICO'S AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH A UFO BEFORE LANDING IN 1994! HOAX.
- Latest ET Photo Hoax Exposed
- Maussan hoax? And HOWE!!! (AKA flying horse)
- OdyessyLink -- True Story or Hoax? It's a HOAX!!!
- Investigative Journalist or willing believer?
what about the flying horse?
Ah, about this case, in particular about the radioactivity: WHAT is it supposed to prove the radioactivity?
Anyway, pheraps he doesn't do it purposely, but of course is a prolific promoter of HOAXES.
I'm not sure what you mean. Figure 14 in the report linked to the OP is labeled:
Originally posted by FlySolo
The exact same mirage twice, a year a part to the date +/-? Why is it that everything is possible, yet you ignore the odds of probability?
so it's not exactly a year apart and it's not the exact same mirage.
Figure 14. Objetos grabados el 16/06/2008 y el 15/05/2009 Objects recorded on 16/06/2008 and 15/05/2009
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
Maussan has posted a lot of fake information;
I think if he was real,
He would post retraction statements of his failures...
There's more than one type of mirage.
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
reply to post by Phage
A mirage is basically heat waves rising from a surface,
which at a distance looks like water...
I think people have a lot of misconceptions of what a mirage is....
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
There's more than one type of mirage.
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
reply to post by Phage
A mirage is basically heat waves rising from a surface,
which at a distance looks like water...
I think people have a lot of misconceptions of what a mirage is....
You are talking about an inferior mirage.
This object would most likely be a superior mirage, if that's what it is. Before you accuse other people of having misconceptions it might be wise to do a little research yourself to make sure you aren't one of those people:
Types of Mirages
So you still think mirages are inferior mirages, even though my source pointed out there are superior mirages which are different?
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
I have read your source,
I stand by my earlier statement,
Why do you think it's in one concentrated area? I don't assume that it is.
Why is it only in 1 concentrated area?
And the price of water chestnuts in Tibet was increased by 2.7%. What does either of those have to do with a superior mirage? The ocean is actually curved due to the curvature of the Earth by the way, not level.
It is a fact that the entire ocean is almost level in the matter of angular degrees...
For a superior mirage? Not necessarily. The waves wouldn't have any effect if the inversion layer is sufficiently high. Obviously if the inversion layer is at 15 meters and the swells are 16 meters, what you say could be true. But if the swells are 2 meters and the inversion layer is at 100 meters, why would the waves have any effect?
There are also ocean waves that would cause the mirage to distort and fluctuate
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
So you still think mirages are inferior mirages, even though my source pointed out there are superior mirages which are different?
Originally posted by SupremeKnowledge
I have read your source,
I stand by my earlier statement,
Why do you think it's in one concentrated area? I don't assume that it is.
Why is it only in 1 concentrated area?
And the price of water chestnuts in Tibet was increased by 2.7%. What does either of those have to do with a superior mirage? The ocean is actually curved due to the curvature of the Earth by the way, not level.
It is a fact that the entire ocean is almost level in the matter of angular degrees...
For a superior mirage? Not necessarily. The waves wouldn't have any effect if the inversion layer is sufficiently high. Obviously if the inversion layer is at 15 meters and the swells are 16 meters, what you say could be true. But if the swells are 2 meters and the inversion layer is at 100 meters, why would the waves have any effect?
There are also ocean waves that would cause the mirage to distort and fluctuate
[edit on 18-7-2010 by Arbitrageur]