It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Pilgrum
I have read quite a bit about him and there's no doubt he acted in a heroic fashion on the day which he deserves great respect for. People owe their lives to his actions in the middle of all that chaos.
The problem, for him, is that his account of what happened on 9/11 has tended to 'morph' over time in various ways which tends to damage his credibility in the eyes of many.
His initial account recorded on 9/11 is the most accurate IMHO
Also look into the account of Mike Pecararo
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
William Rodriguez is one of those "pod people", claiming that the planes that hit the towers had pods beneath their wings which fired missiles at the buildings moments before it crashed. He believes the idea so much he even filed a lawsuit in Penssylvania in 2004, suing Bush under the RICO act. It was more or less laughed out of court.
He ALSO testified before Congress how he absolutely definitely saw one of the hijackers in a restricted area within the building, a few months before before the attack. This cannpt be stressed enough- one of the people accused of being part of the hijacking plan, really IS part of the hijacking plan.
The point is, these damned fool conspiracy web sites are unrepentently cherry picking his testimony, leaving out thoroughly dismissed claims of missile pods and inconvenient details like personally witnessing one of the hijackers, and reporting only those parts that conform to what they themseves are putting out I.E. hearing explosions. Why do they feel the need to edit and filter what Rodriguez is saying? Either the guy is a credible witness or he is not. You cannot have it both ways.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
He's not claiming to have seen the pod. He was in the North Tower at the time, trying to help get people out. Whatever conviction he might have regarding an affixed pod is surely just an opinion. It might be incorrect but it is not a lie.
Rodrigues is right about the explosion in the sub level of the North Tower just before the impact of the plane in the upper stories. There is evidence that lends credence to his story. And it has been out there for a while. The Ginny Carr tape, the testimony of others who were in the sub level of the North Tower at the time of the explosion and the interview CNN did with Jean Yurman who heard the explosion and lost TV reception, went to the window and looked up just as the side of the tower exploded out from the aircraft impact.
William Rodriguez is one of those "pod people", claiming that the planes that hit the towers had pods beneath their wings which fired missiles at the buildings moments before it crashed. He believes the idea so much he even filed a lawsuit in Penssylvania in 2004, suing Bush under the RICO act. It was more or less laughed out of court.
Originally posted by impressme
Good post mike, I believe William Rodriguez is telling the truth. There is no reason to believe he is a lair, as some in here want everyone to believe. I can imagine if someone tells his story hundreds of times I am sure they are going to make some mistakes, but it does not mean they are lying.
"We heard a loud rumble, then all of a sudden we heard another rumble like someone moving a whole lot of furniture," Rodriguez said. "And then the elevator opened and a man came into our office and all of his skin was off."
I believe this is more proof that the 911 commission was doing a cover-up “by not including William Rodriguez testimony”. I just cannot understand why America is not demanding a new investigation into the events of 911. I get the feeling that most Americans do not care anymore.
This is not the America I was born and raised in. Most Americans have submitted to government authority, of do not ask questions, and take our word as “gospel truth”, or you are “unpatriotic” for questioning our OS.
I feel the propaganda News media have done a wonderful job of dumbing down the American people
and making a laughing stock of our country while the rest of the world looks on and knows more that the average American when it comes to 911. Most of the people around the world do not support the OS.
I guess they know what their governments are capable of, yet most American cannot fathom the idea that their government would lie to them. I wish I had that cup of fantasy cool aid, because the truth is very painful and I wish I didn’t know what I know now.
What I find funny is that Americans have forgotten that our governments are people too and they do tell lies.
There are people on ATS who think our government cannot make mistakes and they do not cover–up their mistakes, these same people seem to hold our government higher than God himself, or whatever God is.
It’s one thing to disagree with William Rodriguez but to make outrageous statements like this is quite disturbing.
Because of a person beliefs, or opinions does not mean the person is a lair.
Because a person lost his, or her case in court, doesn’t make them a lair.
People who are so quick to judge, by ridiculing an individual because, of one belief may want to look in the mirror.
I am still amazed by the immaturity, ignorance, and the posting manners by OS believers who take such joy in insulting the truth when it is staring them in the face.
"I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower."
Originally posted by ImAPepper
The problem is; he changed his story. Substantially. Did you read the link I provided above? This is from September 12, 2001:
"We heard a loud rumble, then all of a sudden we heard another rumble like someone moving a whole lot of furniture," Rodriguez said. "And then the elevator opened and a man came into our office and all of his skin was off."
archives.cnn.com...
"I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the north tower."
Originally posted by ipsedixit
You need to look into this a little more. There were eyewitnesses to destruction on the sub levels before the building came down.
There was an area where there was a printing press of some sort that was blown up.
Originally posted by ipsedixit
Aren't you simply verifying his point, that parts of what he said were ignored by the commision?
Originally posted by ImAPepper
The commission has two forms in the link I provided. The printed documents and the hand written notes by the person conducting the interview.
The notes show nothing about explosions taking down the world trade center. Unless you are saying the person taking the notes stopped writing when explosions were brought up?
Since the release of the 9/11 Commission notes, WR has not made this claim, however.