It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
reply to post by sunny_2008ny
This whole mission was stupid.
We put 2 cool rovers on Mars.
Lets put 2 on the moon.
--------------------------------------
That huge telescope on Palomar with a 200 inch mirror
and adaptive optics should have seen something.
Originally posted by Phage
Hubble is operated by NASA. What's your point? If Hubble had reported anything you wouldn't dismiss it as being from the dreaded NASA?
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by amari
Like this?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
As for rovers on the moon?
Lunokhod 1
Lunokhod 2
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Phage
Hubble is operated by NASA. What's your point? If Hubble had reported anything you wouldn't dismiss it as being from the dreaded NASA?
How come is it that when we talked about seeing Apollo stuff on the Moon evryone said Hubble cannot see anything in detail on the Moon...
Yet now all of a sudden Hubble CAN see detail on the Moon?
What a load of crap... either it can or it can't...
Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to gather information and footage if they had targeted a crater on the face of the moon that faces us?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Phage
Hubble is operated by NASA. What's your point? If Hubble had reported anything you wouldn't dismiss it as being from the dreaded NASA?
How come is it that when we talked about seeing Apollo stuff on the Moon evryone said Hubble cannot see anything in detail on the Moon...
Yet now all of a sudden Hubble CAN see detail on the Moon?
What a load of crap... either it can or it can't...