posted on Nov, 9 2008 @ 08:12 PM
annonymous
Jesus was not born on the winter solstice. It was set at that date hundreds of years after the death of Christ to accommodate the pagans in the roman
empire, just as the Sabbath day was changed to SUNday to accommodate the sun worshipers. Nowhere does it say in the Bible Christ was born at this
time, it actually hints at the warmer months, since shepherds were in the field at night on the day of his birth
yeh i heard that one in my study and had to have a think about it so i looked at the weather in this area, well winter in the middle east aint like
the winter we have and on the lowlands its cold at night but its cold at night in the summer, depends on what the wind brings in alot of the time, and
it dont mention snow or freezing of the jordan/nile/euthrates in the good book so it wasnt freezing.
also these peoples roots were nomadic and so were there habits, they were survivers. they stopped and slept with the sheep to protect them from
theives and wolves and the sort, like the story of king david states.
so i would use these initial points to explain how my statement still could be the case and still be in december, but i also agree it could be that
they have moved the dates to fit in with the pagan faith of the time for an easy transission. something to think about.
lets consider your point that they moved the date. this leaves the same question i have been considering which is "how much of the convienient
literature been changed to siute and if so how reliable is the book".
happy hunting
Motto: Fide sed cui vide: "Trust, but mind whom you trust”.