It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Obama said that as president he would indeed ask his new Attorney General and his deputies to "immediately review the information that's already there" and determine if an inquiry is warranted -- but he also tread carefully on the issue, in line with his reputation for seeking to bridge the partisan divide. He worried that such a probe could be spun as "a partisan witch hunt." However, he said that equation changes if there was willful criminality, because "nobody is above the law."
The question was inspired by a recent report by ABC News, confirmed by the Associated Press, that high-level officials including Vice President Dick Cheney and former Cabinet secretaries Colin Powell, John Ashcroft and Donald Rumsfeld, among others, met in the White House and discussed the use of waterboarding and other torture techniques on terrorism suspects.
Originally posted by budski
Is Obama jumping on another bandwagon, or is he actually serious about this?
Originally posted by budski
it seems the voices are being heard.
Originally posted by blackbox
At least McCain has a stance. Agree with it or not, it's refreshing to see someone finally put their foot down on an issue.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
I'd rather they not waste the time and the millions in tax money that any "investigation" would cost.
If he doesn't like waterboarding get a bill passed banning its use and sign it.
He doesn't need to drag on some OJ-esque / 911 Commission spectacle for months and millions $$$. What a waste.
Originally posted by danx
Originally posted by blackbox
At least McCain has a stance. Agree with it or not, it's refreshing to see someone finally put their foot down on an issue.
What does it matter if someone takes a firm stance if it's the wrong one? This President (says he) is firm on a lot of issues, and what good has come from that?
So you like McCain's position that he won't investigate any wrongdoings of the Bush administration because it's refreshing to see someone finally take a stance?
That doesn't make any sense to me...
Originally posted by danx
So you don't care if the President (or anyone else) has violated the Constitution and International Law?
You mean like the sort of spectacle the Republicans made with the Lewinsky case?
And I'm sorry, the 9/11 Commission was a waste of time and money? I hope you're referring to it as a waste in terms of the integrity of the investigation. You can't possibly be saying that investigating the worst terrorist attack in American soil is a waste of money and time, right?
Originally posted by blackbox
I said that it was refreshing that he has a stance at all. Respecting someone for having a firm position on a subject does not mean you have to agree with them.