It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by zorgon
Not really, at the time of their posts 13th_disciple had been a member for six months, 67daniel for one year and porschedrifter for almost four years, not really newbies.
Not the audible range, those were radio signals, so they changed the frequency to make them audible.
Originally posted by Localjoe3
First off , the three "Sweeps" towards the end are a signal generator of some kind sweeping through the audible range imho.
Time on this recording has been compressed such that 13 seconds corresponds to 27 seconds. Since the frequencies of these emissions are well above the audio frequency range, we have shifted them downward by a factor of 260.
Originally posted by ArMaPNot the audible range, those were radio signals, so they changed the frequency to make them audible.
Originally posted by ArMaP
It would be useful if someone could find known natural radio transmissions to use as a comparison.
Originally posted by ArMaP
As you can see, although the signals are obviously related, just reducing the frequency of the radio signal to audible frequencies would not make the original sound audible.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by zorgon
That would have been a better comparison, since the other comparison was flawed.
And it's natural that they translate the radio signals to sound, we are very sensitive to changes in frequency, so we can "see" better a wave by hearing it than by seeing it on a graph.
OK, but as you said "sweeping through the audible range" I thought you thought that this was originally in the audible range, you would not be the first (and I suppose not the last) to think that this was really and recording from Jupiter.
Originally posted by Localjoe3
I don't think you understood my original point, i know the audio was down sampled but the point is that there's gotta be some device that sweeps like that so precisely and 3 times over ..
I don't know if it's natural or not, I do not have any knowledge about natural radio emissions, but I never underestimate nature.
Thats not natural any way you slice it. And the beginning could be noise but it sure sounds like modulated data.
I don't think your observations are flawed, I only think that your opinion that this is not natural is premature because we do not have any data to support or contradict any possibility.
Try to be patient here with me if you think my observations are flawed.. =
Even if you were just a 14 year old you would get my attention, I never dismiss any opinion because of the people behind it.
I understand im a newbie to you folks because of my points or whatever, but im a cisco network tech, a computer network engineer and ive run a dj business and live audio for 7 years so i do know what im talking about im not just some 14 year old to bicker with i really think this deserves some attention.
Originally posted by ArMaPI don't know if it's natural or not, I do not have any knowledge about natural radio emissions, but I never underestimate nature.
Yes, pure speculation.
Originally posted by zorgon
So then based on this admission, anything you say on the matter is purely speculation... saying as you do that you "do not have any knowledge"
Originally posted by BlasteR These are not recordings of audible sounds they are electromagnetic recordings that are amplified and processed for audible hearing.