It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Iranian President said that the SCO could “ward off the threats of domineering powers to use their force against and interfere in the affairs of other states”.
Golitsyn maintains that the goals of the master plan were to provide a more profound political stabilization of individual communist regimes by developing wider mass support, the rectification of economic weakness of the bloc by increased international trade and the acquisition of credits and high technology from the West, the creation of a substructure for an eventual world federation of communist states, political isolation of the US from its allies, developing influence among socialists in Western Europe and Japan, the dissolution of NATO, and an alignment between the Soviet Union and a neutral, preferably socialist, Western Europe; concerted action with nationalist leaders in the Third World to eliminate Western influence as a preliminary to absorbing them in a communist federation, shifting the balance of power in favor of the Communist world, and the ideological disarmament of the West to create favorable conditions for convergence of East and West on communist terms.
originally posted by Subz
So does that mean Afghanistan, Pakistan and India are all in an alliance against the West too? But isnt Pakistan a staunch ally of the United States in the War on Terror? And wasnt India recently called a "strategic partner" by President Bush?
Originally posted by subz
So does that mean Afghanistan, Pakistan and India are all in an alliance against the West too? But isnt Pakistan a staunch ally of the United States in the War on Terror? And wasnt India recently called a "strategic partner" by President Bush?
Originally posted by subz
Do you have anything other than your deep seated mistrust of the Russians to base your accusation that this coalition has a nefarious purpose? Countering aggressive American foreign policy brings about balance. Left unchecked is what would lead to problems IMO.
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
............
So take the nafarious "communist" term out of it, since the last true elements of communism can only be found on a little island ruled by a guy that just wont die, and a small country that is controlled by a real life troll figurine...
Originally posted by LazarusTheLong
and this becomes just another group of loosely affiliated grumblers that assume to much...
(loosely as in, they would be just as likely to oppose Iran, if they knew how many devious ploys Russia has put in the game here...)
I am concerned, but only if these nations dont understand that they are pawns, being played by the big three... and i give them more credit than that...
after all, they were smart enough diplomatically to associate with this up and coming power group. (diplomatically speaking of course, not literally)
Originally posted by subz
Ah yeah Iran being so cozy with Al-Qaeda would be a bit of an issue now that they've threatend Russia. Also how close exactly would Afghanistan want to be to the Russians? I would of thought forming an alliance with a country that invaded you not 20 years ago to fight a country that "liberated" you not 5 years ago is a bit strange.
Originally posted by stumason
And, pray tell, what are these supposed ties between Iran and Al Qaeda? Makes no sense. AQ are Wahhabi Sunni's, whereas Iran is fundamentalist Shia. It's like the IRA and the UDF forming an alliance
Originally posted by subz
Originally posted by stumason
And, pray tell, what are these supposed ties between Iran and Al Qaeda? Makes no sense. AQ are Wahhabi Sunni's, whereas Iran is fundamentalist Shia. It's like the IRA and the UDF forming an alliance
I was being sarcastic, some one needs to invent a sarcasm font Any one who's read anything I have written on here knows I think Al-Qaeda is a CIA/Mossad operation.
Originally posted by stumason
My bad ... I actually mistook you for Shots, sorry .. I always get you guys mixed up until i read your posts...
Originally posted by subz
ROFL! I was going to say no harm, no foul...but Shots? He's like the anti-subz
No worries hehe
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
The American paranoia towards Russia is never ending. Its very frustrating to watch the politics play out. It's also too bad as the United States and Russia could have become great allies not too long ago.
When the U.S.S.R. fell a part, the potential for America to swoop in and help pick up the pieces was sitting there for the taking. A little short term investment for long term gain would have made the two great superpowers the alliance to end all alliances. Unfortunately the government took a stand-offish approach and allowed American companies to profiteer at the expense of the suffering Russian people. Sadly, one of the greatest opportunities to solve many American problems in recent history went by the wayside. That opportunity was to help the Russians with their burgeoning oil export economy and become their larget customer. If the United States had displayed any foresight what so ever, they would have taken this opportunity to get off of middle eastern oil, converted the Russians to the "American way of life", and hooked them into our economic system when they are too dependent on use to war against us. Huge missed opportunity that set the two powers in different directions.
To make matters worse, our President has been as uncooperative as anyone can imagine and has forced countries to choose sides. This has forced Russia and China on the same side, and sees India willing to align with their long time ally (Russia). I don't care what technical advantage we have, the Russians and Chinese outgun us in nukes and their conventional forces numbers are nothing to sniff at. Add in the Indians and it becomes even scarier. Too bad our President have the brains to play nice with the other kids. It would be much nicer to have the Russians on our side. But that's the American way. We "always" have to have an enemy to worry about.