It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
The American paranoia towards Russia is never ending. Its very frustrating to watch the politics play out. It's also too bad as the United States and Russia could have become great allies not too long ago.
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
To make matters worse, our President has been as uncooperative as anyone can imagine and has forced countries to choose sides. This has forced Russia and China on the same side, and sees India willing to align with their long time ally (Russia). I don't care what technical advantage we have, the Russians and Chinese outgun us in nukes and their conventional forces numbers are nothing to sniff at. Add in the Indians and it becomes even scarier. Too bad our President have the brains to play nice with the other kids. It would be much nicer to have the Russians on our side. But that's the American way. We "always" have to have an enemy to worry about.
Originally posted by The Iconoclast
I call it a result of poorly played politics on both sides of the debate. Bottom line is that WE had plenty of opportunities to make decisions that could have easily brought our countries closer together, and OUR government failed to acknowledge these opportunities. WE, the ones that are supposed to be the shining example to the rest of the world, pushed the Russians in another direction. WE encouraged their actions. WE have to assume as much responsibility in that regard as we try and blame the Russians for.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Looking at the situation though, I think in the interest of russia, they would want to. These guys suffered the most because of people like Mussolini and Hitler.
In sum the communist probably have murdered something like 110,000,000, or near two-thirds of all those killed by all governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas from 1900 to 1987. Of course, the world total itself it shocking. It is several times the 38,000,000 battle-dead that have been killed in all this century's international and domestic wars. Yet the probable number of murders by the Soviet Union alone--one communist country-- well surpasses this cost of war. And those murders of communist China almost equal it.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
These Fascists I would suggest reading up on, espeically mussolini. Its interesting to watch as the quotes of mussolini become more and more relevent in america. As for russia, after watching millions die because of an IMPERIAL FASCIST nation, Id say they would be worried.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
When I look at the US in current times, its hard not to look at them that way. 2 countries invaded in 5 years over loose facts, if that doesnt sound like imperialism then I dont know what does. But yes I have no doubt that russia is out to get us, but can you blame them. I dont think its about communism anymore though. I think its more about there first hand experience with fascist states.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
You would be suprised how "free" people in italy were, so long as they were politically dissenting toward communism or something to that extent. The only reason we dont execute communists now, is because they arent a threat like they were to the fascists then.
Life in Mussolini's Italy was little different from other dictatorships which existed between 1918 and 1939. Nazi Germany and Stalin's Russia were to use (and expand) on developments that had been in existence in Fascist Italy since the 1920's. People had little control over their personal life and the state controlled as much of you as they could. Those who opposed the state were suitably punished.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
The more right we go, so long as big business is in our country, the more fascist we seem to go. There is nothing wrong with right wing, so long as you dont hand over the power to business rather then lower government. Thats the main problem. Thats what russia is worrying about, with rightful cause.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
In all honesty Muaddib, I think you are making an enemy out of people who arent your enemy. These russian people arent out to get you or your way of life, they are out to get your government, who I might add are not one in the same. Our foreign policies and our governments actions are there enemy.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
Your not going to turn america communist unless the majority of people support it, which they wont.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
In most of the communist nations, they had large groups of communist supporters before russia ever touch the nation (had to do with poverty level in those nations). In america, the threat of communism is and always was hype. What you should be worrying about is why they are afraid of our government?
Here we have it folks, finally they are showing what the SCO is really for, all those countries which are members, or are seeking full membership on the SCO, have one goal in common as can be read from the article, and I quote..
quote: Iranian President said that the SCO could “ward off the threats of domineering powers to use their force against and interfere in the affairs of other states”.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I knew this was your submission, Muadibb, you're so predictable.
Here we have it folks, finally they are showing what the SCO is really for, all those countries which are members, or are seeking full membership on the SCO, have one goal in common as can be read from the article, and I quote..
quote: Iranian President said that the SCO could “ward off the threats of domineering powers to use their force against and interfere in the affairs of other states”.
So, this is the only goal they have in common, eh? Nice propaganda. By the way, what's the significance of saying they are going to ward off threats from those that try to use force to determine the course of their states?
Honestly, it seems like what you are saying is..."How dare they not bow down to the United States and the West! I can't believe they would actually try to defend against any force we use! The arrogance of a country to believe they have the right to defend their own sovereign nation! *Scoff*"
Are you really surprised by this? Do you think the US has a monopoly on idealogy? Do you think the US has the right to determine the course of any sovereign nation? If they want to fight against the global hegemon of the US, they are right to do so. Not country should have a monopoly on thought. They have as much right to defend themselves as the US does. There is no moral high ground in this argument Muadibb, no matter how you try to spin it, it's still all politics.
[edit on 21-6-2006 by Jamuhn]
Originally posted by wondernut
the problem is that they are not seeking defence, they are seeking offence
all a nuclear weapon does is create fear of it being used and terror if it is used
therefore anyone that uses a nuclear weapon is by deffinition a terrorist, one who creates terror
disclaimer:
nagasaki and heroshima were attacked by the us to rapidly force japan out of the war, thus saving some estimated 10 million lives and sacrificing less than 1 million
greater good and what not
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I knew this was your submission, Muadibb, you're so predictable.
Originally posted by Jamuhn
............
Are you really surprised by this? Do you think the US has a monopoly on idealogy? Do you think the US has the right to determine the course of any sovereign nation? If they want to fight against the global hegemon of the US, they are right to do so. Not country should have a monopoly on thought. They have as much right to defend themselves as the US does. There is no moral high ground in this argument Muadibb, no matter how you try to spin it, it's still all politics.
[edit on 21-6-2006 by Jamuhn]
Originally posted by Jamuhn
I haven't seen any evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapon or plan on using it for offense. But, wouldn't your definition and position towards nukes make the US a terrorist nation
Iranian fatwa approves use of nuclear weapons
By Colin Freeman and Philip Sherwell in Washington
(Filed: 19/02/2006)
Iran's hardline spiritual leaders have issued an unprecedented new fatwa, or holy order, sanctioning the use of atomic weapons against its enemies.
In yet another sign of Teheran's stiffening resolve on the nuclear issue, influential Muslim clerics have for the first time questioned the theocracy's traditional stance that Sharia law forbade the use of nuclear weapons.
..................
One senior mullah has now said it is "only natural" to have nuclear bombs as a "countermeasure" against other nuclear powers, thought to be a reference to America and Israel.
..................
Rooz reported that Mohsen Gharavian, a lecturer based in a religious school in the holy city of Qom, had declared "for the first time that the use of nuclear weapons may not constitute a problem, according to Sharia."
He also said: "When the entire world is armed with nuclear weapons, it is permissible to use these weapons as a counter-measure. According to Sharia too, only the goal is important."
Originally posted by Muaddib
The Iranian president was invited to address a meeting of the Shangai Co-operation Organisation, which was founded by China, Russia and the Central Asian republics ten years ago to fight terrorism, religious extremism and separatism.
from subz
Countering aggressive American foreign policy brings about balance.
from subz
I dont doubt for one moment this group exists. I also dont doubt that they are concerned with current US foreign policy. That concern is shared amongst NATO countries as well as America's traditional allies. That a group would form with the explicit intent of curbing the excesses of American international influence does not equate to an anti-Western alliance.
from The Iconoclast
The American paranoia towards Russia is never ending. Its very frustrating to watch the politics play out. It's also too bad as the United States and Russia could have become great allies not too long ago.
from The Iconoclast
I call it a result of poorly played politics on both sides of the debate. Bottom line is that WE had plenty of opportunities to make decisions that could have easily brought our countries closer together, and OUR government failed to acknowledge these opportunities. WE, the ones that are supposed to be the shining example to the rest of the world, pushed the Russians in another direction. WE encouraged their actions. WE have to assume as much responsibility in that regard as we try and blame the Russians for.
from Jamuhn
So, this is the only goal they have in common, eh?
Do you think the US has the right to determine the course of any sovereign nation?
I haven't seen any evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapon or plan on using it for offense. But, wouldn't your definition and position towards nukes make the US a terrorist nation.
Despite all that, Iran's speech takes a definitive defensive posture, and refers more to just threat of military force from the West, but other forces and influences as well, such as economic, cultural, ec.
Originally posted by jsobecky
from Jamuhn
So, this is the only goal they have in common, eh?
What do you think their purpose is?
Do you think the US has the right to determine the course of any sovereign nation?
Which country are we trying to dominate?
I haven't seen any evidence that Iran has a nuclear weapon or plan on using it for offense. But, wouldn't your definition and position towards nukes make the US a terrorist nation.
Despite all that, Iran's speech takes a definitive defensive posture, and refers more to just threat of military force from the West, but other forces and influences as well, such as economic, cultural, ec.
Iran is most assuredly seeking nuclear weopanry. To deny that is pure naivete'.
Remember, their "culture" includes beating women activists: