It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think compassionate people wouldn't use the word retarded. I don't think words should ever really be banned, however I would submit that' Trump would let you say that word even of him, while that glorious altruistic side of the left would have the word canceled. Ooops it is.
originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: arcticshuffle
Like when you fart loudly among drunken buddies.
Personally, I don’t like the idea of getting the retarded and ill all riled up. I’m a compassionate fellow.
I like the way you put that though I was always one to do it silently and do the finger pointing. And I agree that that observation of Trump is a main reason for my dislike of him. His manner of stoking his retarded followers is at the very same time the manner that riles up his retarded detractors.
Your comment about how funny it is when he riles his opposition like that. It is funny but even that now seems to be part of our division. Late night comics are all, and I mean all are now making a living from the funny stuff that he does, it's a whole industry now. Meanwhile he offers almost each and every day a huge rally where those who are so happily entertained by him show up in droves to hear and watch their favorite vaudevillian perform for them so that they in turn can laugh back at his detractors
originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
Yep.. "Projection", pure and simple. If we listen carefully, we may learn what Joe Biden's "Election Fraud Organization" is up to this year.
originally posted by: AgarthaSeed
a reply to: WeMustCare
Hey Care!
I'm just stopping by to point out that even with rampant inflation you can purchase your copy of The Mueller Report for $2.99
www.secondsale.com... vice=m&gad_source=4&gclid=CjwKCAiA3JCvBhA8EiwA4kujZsUSscD07Kod2FHxiwK-65KZVo14IPm1qG6r_hxOamOD-z9EgQIolBoCHm8QAvD_BwE
Its 720 pages that cover 2 years of.....well...nothing.
originally posted by: Euronymous2625
I have some bad news for you. Good news for the world, but bad for the qult. Trump has ZERO chance of winning. Start simping over someone else. Preferably someone who doesn't wear diapers.
Source: thehill.com...
Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) on Sunday criticized the Supreme Court’s decision last week to take up former President Trump’s immunity appeal because it delays the start of the former president’s federal Jan. 6 trial.
More at: www.westernjournal.com...
House Democrats began to craft a scheme Monday to disqualify former President Donald Trump from running for a second term, reacting to the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump cannot be banned from the ballot in Colorado.
In a unanimous 9-0 ruling, the country’s highest court reversed a ruling from the Colorado Supreme Court that barred Trump from the ballot for president.
The state court ruled Trump had engaged in “insurrection” on Jan. 6, 2021, and, therefore, is not eligible for federal office.
The interpretation of the insurrection clause from the 14th Amendment was shot down by the Supreme Court.
More at: www.rawstory.com...
Judge Aileen Cannon has described two recent filings — both in support of former President Donald Trump's motion to dismiss his confidential document case — as helpful, spurring concerns among legal experts and those closely following the case.
Cannon filed to the Florida federal court Wednesday a paperless order accepting two amicus briefs, one from the America First Legal Foundation and one from former Reagan era Attorney General Ed Meese, calling on the Florida federal judge to dismiss charges against Trump, court records show.
Former federal prosecutor (Bob Mueller's "Pit Bull Attack Dog") and frequent MSNBC commentator Andrew Weissmann, immediately expressed his concern.
"Ok to take amicus," Weissmann wrote on X. "But the commentary from the court is worrisome."
Cannon gives special counsel Jack Smith — who has charged Trump with 37 counts that include willful retention of national defense information — until March 15 to respond to the briefs.
Source: sg.news.yahoo.com...
Former president and current GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump’s top priority since being indicted in four different jurisdictions on dozens of felony charges has been clear: Delay the trials until after the election.
The Supreme Court gave Trump exactly what he wanted when it agreed to hear arguments on April 25 regarding Trump’s claim that he has an “absolute immunity” from federal prosecution for attempting to overturn his 2020 election loss.
By taking the case and scheduling a hearing on April 25, the court has radically increased the chances that the trial will not reach a verdict prior to the Nov. 5 general election. It wouldn’t be the first time the Supreme Court, like other federal courts, has helped Trump dodge the consequences of litigation by running out the clock.
www.rawstory.com...
"The Judge’s ruling was virtually incomprehensible, even to those of us who speak 'legal' as our native language. If you tried to write something that was deliberately dumb, this sentence would be it," she argued.
originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: WeMustCare
Are you hinting at MAGA voters supporting a vengeful incoming president? I keep hearing talks of what seem to indicate violence towards those whom are not MAGA. I don't see anyone denouncing this type of speak so I must assume it is generally acceptable.
originally posted by: Kaiju666
originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: WeMustCare
Are you hinting at MAGA voters supporting a vengeful incoming president? I keep hearing talks of what seem to indicate violence towards those whom are not MAGA. I don't see anyone denouncing this type of speak so I must assume it is generally acceptable.
Wrong. People want the laws and justice followed and executed.
You: OMG look they just said they want to execute everyone. VIOLENCE!