Democratics Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush vote no on bill banning Hamas terrorists from US

These two nitwits voted 'NO' to banning Hamas terrorists from the US. They claim the bill was redundant and would incite hate. How the hell did they get in office? Who votes for this kind of thinking? WOW.


Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush vote no on bill banning Hamas terrorists from US

Only two House lawmakers on Wednesday voted against a measure seeking to ban Hamas terrorists involved in last October’s attack on Israel from ever entering the US – Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Cori Bush (D-Mo.).

The No Immigration Benefits for Hamas Terrorists Act, introduced by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.), would deem any members of Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, the Palestine Liberation Organization or other individuals who participated in or facilitated the Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attack on the Jewish state ineligible to enter the US, even if seeking asylum.

The bill passed the lower chamber in a 422-2 vote, with Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill) voting present and six members not voting.

Where does it end, this persona non-grata.

a reply to: FlyersFan

On what planet do you not vote yes for this?🙄

America has lost its way when losers like the squad are being voted into office. These are some of the dumbest people I’ve ever heard and the fact they’ve been elected into congress is just mind blowing to me. Don’t even get me started on the senile dementia puppetard they dumped on us for prez and kackles the class clown our VP. Not sure the bar can get much lower than where we’re at now.

a reply to: FlyersFan

Tlaib and Bush are terrorists themselves, it’s no wonder they sympathize with terrorists.

That's what happens though when people ELECT terrorists to political positions. Fact.

a reply to: FlyersFan

There are already laws that prevent terrorists from immigrating to America. They cover 'legal' immigration, though; laws for illegal immigration is just a wats of time amd money.

Nobody in government gollows laws anyway, so this is just more political stupidity.

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: FlyersFan

There are already laws that prevent terrorists from immigrating to America. They cover 'legal' immigration, though; laws for illegal immigration is just a wats of time amd money.

Nobody in government gollows laws anyway, so this is just more political stupidity.

The fact those two are in this country prove how ineffective or unenforced the laws actually are. But I don't think they were thinking it through at all. They often try to make illeagle things more illeagle all the time.

a reply to: nugget1
The law exists that prevent terrorists from emigrating to America. How does that law work if the person emigrating is a terrorist, he knows he's a terrorist, the rest of the world knows he's a terrorist, bbuuutt your country does not recognise him as a terrorist.?????

originally posted by: crayzeed
a reply to: nugget1
The law exists that prevent terrorists from emigrating to America. How does that law work if the person emigrating is a terrorist, he knows he's a terrorist, the rest of the world knows he's a terrorist, bbuuutt your country does not recognise him as a terrorist.?????

One key fact is missing; immigration laws arenot being followed. By law, people are supposed to applyfor a visa to enter the country, not walk across an illegal red carpet at the southern border.

The invasion has nothing at all to do with humanitarian efforts; it's all about destabilizing America and bringing our nation of prosperity to an end.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3

originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: FlyersFan

There are already laws that prevent terrorists from immigrating to America. They cover 'legal' immigration, though; laws for illegal immigration is just a wats of time amd money.

Nobody in government gollows laws anyway, so this is just more political stupidity.

The fact those two are in this country prove how ineffective or unenforced the laws actually are. But I don't think they were thinking it through at all. They often try to make illeagle things more illeagle all the time.

You're looking at what happens when a group of radicals becomes the majority population in a district.

History shows us how red states turned blus through the decades by one election at a time. It's happening in Mormon majority southern Idaho right now, and our state is one of the top destinations for people fleeing the liberal insanity of their home states; problem is, they want all the freebees they grew accoustomed to in California, etc. so tend to elect the same liberal ideologists.
Just as liberal judges seem to have the most money behind getting them appointed, there seems to be a lot more money for liberal campaign coffers in conservative states.
The biggest problem seems to be people voting who lack the education to understand the consequences of the representatives they elect and what those will be years from now. Everybody wants instant grattification and all the government freebees they can get, yet history plainly shows what the end result will be.

a reply to: FlyersFan

They did it for fundraising in their districts.
Illegal personal security ain't cheap.

a reply to: FlyersFan
Funny how you think a "terrorist" organization of less than 20k men primarily contained in an open air prison somehow pose more of a threat to you than our own ally who has been proven to have attacked us in numerous occasions.


Wake up you propagandized fool!

Why are you on this website anyway if you are going to continually side with the establishment? You do realize what a conspiracy theory is right?

ETA:
Israel did 9-11.

originally posted by: JAY1980
Funny how you think a "terrorist" organization of less than 20k men primarily contained in an open air prison somehow pose more of a threat ....

Funny how you think Hamas is less than 20K men and that it's contained.
Funny how you think the word terrorist should be put in quotes as if it's not true.
Funny how you think others are propagandized but that you yourself aren't.
Funny how you think Hamas and it's sympathizers don't want to destroy you.
Funny how you can't make a post without insulting people which is against the rules.
Funny how you keep saying Israel did 9/11 when that nonsense has long ago been debunked.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

It's easy to see how such a law could be abused to prevent legitimate asylum seekers from entering the country who are simply seeking an escape from a war that has left them homeless.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

They claim the bill was redundant and would incite hate.

Well, good. What do they want, us to love terrorists? Terrorists SHOULD be hated.

a reply to: Threadbarer

Also very easy to see how our current admin cares more about other countries homeless and asylum seekers than they do our own homeless population.

a reply to: PorkChop96

Remind me again what Party it is that keeps putting things like welfare programs on the chopping block?

a reply to: Threadbarer

Remind me again what party it is that is notorious for their voters to be the ones abusing those programs?

originally posted by: Threadbarer
Remind me again what Party it is that keeps putting things like welfare programs on the chopping block?

Remind me again what party it is that keeps putting illegals on welfare programs and giving them free housing, food, and medical care thus bankrupting the welfare programs that are in place for AMERICANS, and thus necessitating the cuts in the programs.