"New World Order" Is Now "The Great Reset"

My understanding is that it was Pres. George H.W. Bush who first uttered "New World Order" before the U.S. Congress, on September 11, 1990.

Now I see the World Economic Forum (WEF) as being the mouthpiece for The Great Reset, which is what we hear about at present. The spokespeople for it are Klaus Schwab and Yuval Harari, both of them academics.

I think the agenda can be summarized by understanding the meaning behind two of their buzzwords:

PPP (Public Private Partnership)
SDG (Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations)

To me, PPP = rule by corporations.

And SDG = the end of sovereign nations on planet Earth.

I think the losers in this are we the people.

What do you think?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

I think their "reset" is a minority of countries, and only billed as "global".

The Greatest Show On Earth!

Oh really . . .

originally posted by: NobodySpecial268
I think their "reset" is a minority of countries, and only billed as "global".

Are there countries on the planet that are going to help save us?

What gets me is the absolute hubris of these pricks. They think they have the divine right to turn the world upside down and rebuild it according to their "vision". Sociopathic, narcissistic evil gutter turds.

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

The NWO is a bunch of super rich people who promote capitalism and want to sell you stuff, or better still to rent it to you for a monthly fee.

So, rather Ironically, they are probably your best defense against the great reset, because it would ruin them.

Know your enemy.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

......better still to rent it to you for a monthly fee.

So you will own nothing......

MONEY IS WORTHLESS IF EVERYONE HAS TO MUCH OF IT and nothing to buy.

I prefer the current world order, with the USA being top dog. Why would any American be interested in reshuffling the deck? The "NWO" isnt a bunch of rich a-holes, rather a collection of despots attempting, with force, to tilt the world order in their favor.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

I see the NWO and The Great Reset as the same people.

You don't?

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I see the NWO and The Great Reset as the same people.

You don't?

The NWO is a capitalist group, the great refest is WEF and socialist.

Why would the people who produce everything want to put on place a system where they wouldn't get paid for it?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

I think the losers in this are we the people.

What do you think?

We will be eating organic crickets and washing down with recycled P# and S# driving our EV's to only places our digital ID say we're allowed to go.

Losers?

We're royalled EFFED in this dystopia.

originally posted by: WeDemBoyz
I prefer the current world order, with the USA being top dog.

I would like to see we the people worldwide become top dog.

originally posted by: DevotedResearcher
a reply to: AaarghZombies

I see the NWO and The Great Reset as the same people.

You don't?

JaffeMemo.

Same A holes different decade.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

......better still to rent it to you for a monthly fee.

So you will own nothing......

Not quite, you will lease everything. As opposed to you won't consume anything.

The great reset is about ending consumerism, but the NWO is about changing the model of consumerism to a service based one.

Think of it as the NWO as wanting you to rent a huge expensive house that you will never own, rather than to buy a moderate sized one on a mortgage.

And the great reset being about you sharing a bunk room that's assigned to you buy the state in exchange for you eating soy and only having one child with your state assign breeding partner.

The NWO is about expansion and consumption beyond your means, the Great reset is about restrictions and limitations.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies
Not quite, you will lease everything. As opposed to you won't consume anything.

That statement makes no sense to me.

Please be clear.

Is it a different crowd behind The Great Reset, or not?

a reply to: DevotedResearcher

Are there countries on the planet that are going to help save us?

From reading here on ATS, I gather the great reset is the colonial powers trying to hold on to power.

I'm not sure the colonials are well regarded, so why would anyone try to save us?

I'm in Australia by the way.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: AaarghZombies

......better still to rent it to you for a monthly fee.

So you will own nothing......

Not quite, you will lease everything. As opposed to you won't consume anything.

The great reset is about ending consumerism, but the NWO is about changing the model of consumerism to a service based one.

Think of it as the NWO as wanting you to rent a huge expensive house that you will never own, rather than to buy a moderate sized one on a mortgage.

And the great reset being about you sharing a bunk room that's assigned to you buy the state in exchange for you eating soy and only having one child with your state assign breeding partner.

The NWO is about expansion and consumption beyond your means, the Great reset is about restrictions and limitations.

What kinda BS are you trying to peddle now?

This isn't 1970 anymore, the NWO, WEF, Great Reset, WHO, etc, are all the same group of people with the same motives.

Power and Control.

George Soros doesn't want to make money? He JUST wants to "rent" you things?

When we can't come back here to argue about who was right, you'll FINALLY know we were right.



Oh my....

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

The NWO is a capitalist group, the great refest is WEF and socialist.

Why would the people who produce everything want to put on place a system where they wouldn't get paid for it?

Okay I see what you're saying.

You're thinking capitalism vs. socialism.

When I think of NWO, I don't think of capitalism. We had capitalism already when Pres. Bush talked about a New World Order. I think he was talking about going to war to get resources from other countries, on the pretext of whatever (fill in the blank).

a reply to: NobodySpecial268

When I say "save us" I'm talking in terms of we the people.

I think that way all the time now, because I see the events of the last 2 1/2 years as showing us in no uncertain terms that humanity in general is under attack and we're all in this together.

I'm wondering if perhaps countries in South America or Asia or Africa could exert leadership somehow?