The Smoking Gun: DMED Whistle Blower Data Released - It's Shocking

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo

brought up was erroneous and incomplete

They know this before the 'review'?
Um how? Surely it needs to be reviewed before those claims can be made yeah?

LOL

and still people are buying into the narrative and defending having their rights and freedoms stripped from them.....

This has gone waaaay beyond a joke.

What's a joke? Are you saying they are making this all up? There are going to be lawsuits using this data and these 3 whistle blowers. Are you saying they are going to sue someone with a bunch of fake data and whistle blowers? Why?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Not exactly sure what you're saying there so my answer will be based on what I 'think' you're saying there.

I'm saying the whole covid thing is a big damn joke. a very sad joke. The in plain sight crap TPTB are pulling right in front of our eyes.

To clarify I am calling BS on the DoD. Not the data or info in your post.

That how the hell can the DoD claim "the DMED (Defense Medical Epidemiology Database) data from 2016 to 2020 that the whistleblowers brought up was erroneous and incomplete" When it hasn't even been reviewed?

How do the DoD know it is incomplete? They don't and won't until dum-dum-duuuum..... IT'S REVIEWED!

Feels more like they're saying "WE HOPE IT IS INCOMPLETE AND ERRONEOUS WHEN THE REVIEW IS DONE, BUT WE'LL SAY IT IN A WAY THE SHEEP WILL HEAR IT IS ALREADY INCOMPLETE AND ERRONEOUS LIKE IT'S A FACT! LOL"

From the North Pole to the South. I want everyone behind the last 2 years of this SCAMDEMIC crime against humanity lynched.

Hope that makes what I am saying very clear.

In a sign that not only is this real, but that not even mainstream media can put lipstick on this pig, Politicfact not only confirms the 2021 data is accurate, but carries the military spokesperson's telling response. They don't claim that the whistleblowers' 2021 data is wrong, they claim that the multi-billion dollar, audited and foundational system was underreporting cases between 2016 and 2020 so you shouldn't draw any conclusions from the data from their scientific database. I imagine a sh*t ton of data scientists had to work overtime all weekend. Let the coverup games begin!

www.politifact.com...

Where are all the debunkers at? It's like they missed this thread.

lol google search gives me this when I try to look up the original whistle blower story.....

It looks like these results are changing quickly
If this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for results to be added by reliable sources

I've never encountered this message before in all the time google has existed..... hmmmmm.

All results for terms I am using are bringing up the "DoD" spin from OP with that message above.

Looks like those coverup games have indeed begun SentientBunnySuit

a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

It's the desperate micromanaging that keeps increasing 🤣🦅

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

I'm looking for them too. I am guessing they are waiting for the DoD review so they can use that as the source for their counters.

That or they're waiting for the MSM and social medias to tell them what to say.

Impossible for some people to give an opinion before the hive mind has told them what their opinion actually is.

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo
lol google search gives me this when I try to look up the original whistle blower story.....

It looks like these results are changing quickly
If this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for results to be added by reliable sources

I've never encountered this message before in all the time google has existed..... hmmmmm.

All results for terms I am using are bringing up the "DoD" spin from OP with that message above.

Looks like those coverup games have indeed begun SentientBunnySuit

This happened before after the rogan podcast with Dr Malone when you searched for mass formation. Google quickly started editing the search results to hide the evidence. That's why it's better to use other search engines. Google is useless, simply a tool of the government and big pharma.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

oh I know google sucks, but I use it to keep tabs on their BS like this.

I often search google, see it bring back a tonne of irrelevant results then use another engine to see the differences using the same terms.

Problem is, these days all the so called competition focus on privacy and not giving ad revenue based results, BUT (and there is always a but isn't there? lol) nearly every alternate search engine including often suggested ones like duckduckgo still use results taken from bing and google and for me can still be just as useless as those two when it comes to finding what you're looking for outside of pornography.

The days of yahoo and altavista etc. spoiled me. I miss having search engines that actually gave you results you were looking for.

I don't give a single s**t about privacy. I want accuracy. But privacy is the only features you get offered from the alternatives these days...

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

It's the desperate micromanaging that keeps increasing 🤣🦅

Yep.

I also read 'reliable sources' as "sources that fit our narrative and agenda, aka the big msm companies. facts and reality be damned.'

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

It's the desperate micromanaging that keeps increasing 🤣🦅

Yep.

I also read 'reliable sources' as "sources that fit our narrative and agenda, aka the big msm companies. facts and reality be damned.'

The trusted news initiative has near complete control over the mainstream media. Big pharma pays them 7 billion a year to stick to the narrative. Anytime someone like Joe Rogan or substack writers speak the truth to a big enough audience and it challenges the narrative, they send the attack dogs after them.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

It's the desperate micromanaging that keeps increasing 🤣🦅

Yep.

I also read 'reliable sources' as "sources that fit our narrative and agenda, aka the big msm companies. facts and reality be damned.'

The trusted new initiative has near complete control over the mainstream media. Anytime someone like Joe Rogan or substack writers speak the truth to a big enough audience and it challenges the narrative, they send the attack dogs after them.

"Trust the science!"

Someone presents actual science unflattering to the establishment

"That's different, you're anti-vax and probably racist."

For a group of people utterly convinced they are intellectually superior, the left displays a monumentally depressing lack of intellectual curiosity.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Somebody or somethings are trying to weaken the U.S. Military 💎

Duhhh. It’s only what ppl like Alex Jones have been warning about for years…

originally posted by: Tekner
a reply to: Halfswede

The data is always correct, until it says something I don't agree with, then it's bad data.

That is the Marxist playbook right near the top, or the "Tippy top" as AOC likes to say. The marxists love their distorted play on reality as a means of getting the can kicked down the road until they can spring their plans on us. Distort reality so as to confuse. Confusion is always used in Warfare (Sun Tzu).

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Where are all the debunkers at? It's like they missed this thread.

In 3,,,2,,,1,,,

Well maybe they know they can't win this one?

originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0

originally posted by: AtomicKangaroo

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AtomicKangaroo

It's the desperate micromanaging that keeps increasing 🤣🦅

Yep.

I also read 'reliable sources' as "sources that fit our narrative and agenda, aka the big msm companies. facts and reality be damned.'

The trusted new initiative has near complete control over the mainstream media. Anytime someone like Joe Rogan or substack writers speak the truth to a big enough audience and it challenges the narrative, they send the attack dogs after them.

"Trust the science!"

Someone presents actual science unflattering to the establishment

"That's different, you're anti-vax and probably racist."

For a group of people utterly convinced they are intellectually superior, the left displays a monumentally depressing lack of intellectual curiosity.

That playbook the marxists use is about repetitive lying to make those barely paying attention believe the lie. So they thro racist out as a challenge to the messenger and not challenge the actual contents of the data as the media play along. Many willing to accept the lie follow along. Sad for them and worse for those who see it coming like a slow motion train wreck.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
Where are all the debunkers at? It's like they missed this thread.

In 3,,,2,,,1,,,

Well maybe they know they can't win this one?

That doesn't usually stop them...

Meh its just a harmless injection. Everyone gonna be OK. The government cares about us all.

originally posted by: shaemac
Meh its just a harmless injection. Everyone gonna be OK. The government cares about us all.

100%, the government is always looking out for us, especially when they follow the lead of the world economic forum.

Now what?