It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
a reply to: Ophiuchus1
Pinning everything on a single image on a single source viewed upside down through squinty eyes doesn't make a crater a dome!
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
I'm neither, and no it isn't. Dismissing someone as a shill because they disagree with you is just lazy. The Apollo images have always been freely available, as have lunar orbiter images.
Which colour photos? Give me a time stamp.
It's from an unprocessed TIFF image from the 'March to the Moon' website. Any proof you have to the contrary would be just peachy.
Nice get out clause you have there. Care to prove any of that? Care to find any NASA images that differ in any way from Indian, Japanese, Chinese or Soviet images? Anything missing? Added?
And your denial of reality doesn't make your version true.
originally posted by: tachyonator9
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
I'm neither, and no it isn't. Dismissing someone as a shill because they disagree with you is just lazy. The Apollo images have always been freely available, as have lunar orbiter images.
It's the other way around, you were too lazy (unless you're a shill payed to spread disinfo) to do proper research. 99,9% of Apollo and lunar orbiter images are complete garbage, completely devoid of color and detail, there is literally nothing left in them but ugly, completely washed out, gray death.
Which colour photos? Give me a time stamp.
I already did but you don't read. I said first few color photos in the imgur link imgur.com...
Since i have to draw everything i mean the second image in order first one being an article, 3 and 4 being same photo with excess yellow removed then 5 is real color and 6 is same with excess yellow removed, both these are from Vladimir Terzinski as well as one in the video youtu.be...
It's from an unprocessed TIFF image from the 'March to the Moon' website. Any proof you have to the contrary would be just peachy.
Proof is obvious and i already explained it, i don't know why you pretend to not see the obvious. Again, in the two videos i linked you can clearly see the REAL color and contrast and detail of the Moon surface, your "much better" footage is not better at all, it is in higher resolution but color and contrast and detail have been almost completely removed, nothing but dead, dull grayness is left as in almost all publicly released Apollo frames and films, only in rare early ones, intentionally or not, few slipped out which were not retouched in any way or just flipped upside down like the second one i linked. So yea, Moon far side is RICH BROWN-YELLOWISH FULL OF CONTRAST AND TONES, FAR FROM DEAD DULL GRAYNESS
Nice get out clause you have there. Care to prove any of that? Care to find any NASA images that differ in any way from Indian, Japanese, Chinese or Soviet images? Anything missing? Added?
Already did but you deny the obvious. As for other agencies, they are just as ridiculously fake today, just look at Tsiolkovsky and the surface in "HD" footage from JAXA, absolutely no shame.
www.youtube.com...
Person even commented below "black/white in 2012 : )" Not only black and white but contrast, details, everything completely and absolutely removed to a level you have to be blind to look at this and not have ALL your alarms go off and even deny it, it's just beyond.
More of this comical stuff, at 0:43 he even says "central peak looks like an island floating on a dark lake", lil bit of slip there intentional or not. Do i have to say it, compare this (i believe) 2008 "HD" footage with Apollo footage i linked. Come on, it's just ridiculous.
www.youtube.com...
And your denial of reality doesn't make your version true.
Oh the irony.
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo inser shameless liess... You've alleged that someone used photos that weren't public knowledge when in fact they were. Your arguments just aren't holding up.