It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These are not domes but craters which are made to appear as mounds cause colors are inverted
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: tachyonator9
These are not domes but craters which are made to appear as mounds cause colors are inverted
Can't argue with that but it's all I got , hope you find what you're looking for I'd be interested to see it.
originally posted by: tachyonator9
These first few color photos of the Lake Tsiolkovsky, especially the first one, is invaluable. They were given to Vladimir Terzinski by unknown insider in the early 90s. You can clearly see even the varying depth in the sharpened version of the original in which i removed the excess yellow, as well as coastal cities etc. Needless to say you can see that vegetation is literally everywhere except on the higher mounds/mountains, you can see in the top left corner that ironically named "crater" Waterman and other one next to it are lakes too. Truth is very different from average opinion even in this community.
These color photos of the Lake Tsiolkovsky combined with all the rest are doubtlessly a HARD PROOF that conditions on the lunar far side are very similar to those on Earth.
www.youtube.com...
imgur.com...
Here is also this Apollo 8 frame, sadly ibb does not allow bigger resolution, Tsiolkovsky in the center
i.ibb.co...
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
All the unknown insider did was give him freely available photos, there were plenty from Apollo and Lunar Orbiter - including much more detailed ones than the one from distance used here. It's clearly not a lake...
originally posted by: tachyonator9
originally posted by: OneBigMonkeyToo
All the unknown insider did was give him freely available photos, there were plenty from Apollo and Lunar Orbiter - including much more detailed ones than the one from distance used here. It's clearly not a lake...
I don't know if you're a shill or just a skeptic but everything you wrote is false.
Those color photos are not available from NASA,
don't make false claims you will never be able to back up. Or show us the exact frames, i would LOVE to see that. But it won't happen cause they don't exist.
God knows who is the source,
they may be never released Apollo shots or it may be from SSP.
You naively (or rather sleazily) wrote "Moon raw scan"....suuuure.
There is just one little issue there, ALL NASA Moon shots are totally airbrushed, overexposed, flipped etc until anything and everything but dead greyness is washed out.
And It is a lake surrounded by cities and vegetation. Your opposition to the truth is in vain.
originally posted by: tachyonator9
Also compare the contemporary look of official Apollo shots of Tsiolkovsky or any part of the Moon and these official NASA video footages. Only correction i did i flipped the second one cause it was flipped, strangely these two got out non-airbrushed and untouched in any way. THIS is the real Moon. How obvious does it have to become.
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
In the second video you cans see several cities as very bright areas.