Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS) right on schedule

a reply to: GenerationGap
Not once does it say immunity overall. What is immunity overall?

Immunity to what?

GUY HATCHARD: PFIZER DOCUMENT CONCEDES THAT THERE IS A LARGE INCREASE IN TYPES OF ADVERSE EVENT REACTION TO ITS VACCINE Capitals from article

Document released by Pfizer apparently as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world.
Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under reported.
Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious.
This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.

The just released Pfizer document which is being circulated widely in the public domain and can downloaded from websites is entitled:

5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

Therefore the reported side effects predate the vaccine rollout in New Zealand. The report itself was finalised by Pfizer on 30 April 2021. Did Pfizer supply this information to our government during the early days of our universal vaccination programme? If so the results should have been shared with our medical professionals, politicians, and the public. Many of the new 100+ listed new adverse event types now released by Pfizer in this 38 page document pose long term risks to health. Until very recently, the document was being withheld by Pfizer who maintained it should be kept confidential. There is a strong possibility that very large numbers of New Zealanders will suffer long term injury as a result.

So not being from NZ I can't say if the comments of the Government not informing their medical community to watch out for side effects is true or not.

But 1 point did stand out from the article

The third and most significant reason the benefit:risk argument falls over is the sheer range of adverse reaction types observed by Pfizer and kept hidden until now.

This is what 10% of the worlds population in force mandate localities are complaining about -
The risk to healthy individuals doesn't warrant the benefit to them.

They are actually a greater risk to the sick because they a more likely to spread the virus unknowingly.

a reply to: puzzled2

This seems to be a big story and still after 8 days i can't recall a mention of this in the uk.

We've just had our health secretary, Javid, on the radio chanting omicron doomporn about the tidal wave of infections we face and boosters being our only hope. When asked why, if it's that bad, don't we have further restrictions, as the NHS are calling for there's a clear stumble, pause and contradictory u-turn on how lockdowns are bad for mental health etc.

If omicron were as bad as he says and saving lives were tptb's goal, then they'd lockdown over xmas - prevent the mass spreading events around the xmas turkey.

If the goal is to facilitate their public and private donors making as much cash as possible out of covid, then the plan (or plan B as they call it) would be to avoid lockdowns because they hit revenue and use that tidal wave of infections this causes to give pharma as much tax revenue as possible for ever lengthening vaccine contracts.

Meanwhile Javid said that he will indeed be seeing friends and family over xmas... The only way any of this policy chaos makes any sense is if it's all about £££

a reply to: puzzled2

This poor girl in NZ really needs to have her story heard

a reply to: puzzled2

I note this is in the MSM posted in the NZ Telegraph. It essentially means any further vaccinations will be problematic, one can't help noticing that the push to vaccinate is running out of steam. From what I can gather is that doctors were just looking at the rare side effects as stated in the original Phizer handout. But the ER's seem be filling up with a raft of otherwise ignored side effect symptoms. The after-vaccine deaths are around two hundred quoting an independent watchdog. Some ER's are running out of beds for noncovid patients, but it seems if the symptoms are suspected as side effects of the jab they seem to be putting them in sealed areas and keeping it quiet. Dunedin seems to have its ER sealed up for some reason.

I'm wondering, are the side effects predominately suffered by those with a genetic incompatibility with the vaccines? Or is random?

If it's genetic, then eventually, if if booster after booster is administered we should see a flattening curve of adverse effects as those individuals are 'taken out' (for want of a better term).

If the curve doesn't flatten over the next (inevitable) couple of rounds of boosters then is that a sign of adverse effects being random? If so what does that mean? Fundamental faults in the production, or administering? Or something fundamentally dangerous to us all that depends on multiple factors in our health to manifest? Or something else..?

How HIV was employed :

a reply to: nOraKat

I appreciate you posting the vid, but for those of us that don't have an hour and 40 minutes any chance of a summery. Cheers

originally posted by: rickymouse
These vaccines are not very good. They should have run longer testing on them before shoving them on the public.

From the very beginning that was always my contention. Like you, I am not anti-vax, however I am against unproven and untested experimental vaccines.

The average length of time a vaccine takes to receive FDA approval is 10-15 years. Somehow, (we all know how and why) the covid vaccines managed to do it in 5 months.

I hear people blather on about "pre-existing research and testing" which is complete BS. Whenever there is a new version of something then that new version must go through the standard testing process. But because we are STILL under emergency use authorizations act, they were allowed to circumvent the standards and pump this poison into people.

However, these same people all had (and have) access to the same data I've had access to. The difference between me and them is I take the time to read, research, and vet all the information and then make an informed decision.

They made their decisions based off of irrational fear.

originally posted by: Type1338

originally posted by: rickymouse
These vaccines are not very good. They should have run longer testing on them before shoving them on the public.

From the very beginning that was always my contention. Like you, I am not anti-vax, however I am against unproven and untested experimental vaccines.

The average length of time a vaccine takes to receive FDA approval is 10-15 years. Somehow, (we all know how and why) the covid vaccines managed to do it in 5 months.

I hear people blather on about "pre-existing research and testing" which is complete BS. Whenever there is a new version of something then that new version must go through the standard testing process. But because we are STILL under emergency use authorizations act, they were allowed to circumvent the standards and pump this poison into people.

However, these same people all had (and have) access to the same data I've had access to. The difference between me and them is I take the time to read, research, and vet all the information and then make an informed decision.

They made their decisions based off of irrational fear.

I can't say that this vaccine is going to be dangerous for the majority of people, but I can say that it will be dangerous for two percent of people minimum. The flu vaccine even has about a one percent of people it can be dangerous for, but a lot of these people are not taking the flu vaccine because a close relative had a severe reaction from taking the flu vaccine. This kind of cytokine storm and also an anaphylactic reaction is probable for some people with this covid vaccine too, but the people pushing it are not telling people outright that this can happen, they call it perfectly safe then they do not give data that shows who is at risk and should not take this vaccine...you have to search for this and that takes knowledge of where to look. By their excessive pushing of the vaccine and using intimidation tactics and mandates, these government agencies are killing or damaging some people.

There are lots of foods and herbs that can control this virus from causing covid to form from it, in fact, this virus is not novel when a majority of natural chemistries known for hundreds of years or more most times can lessen the risk of it getting bad...chemistries that pharmaceudical companies used to design their meds off of. There are some differences in chemistries that work for one virus but have no effect on others, like tamaflu does not work well with Covid from what I gather, but still the white pine needle tea which contains that chemistry also contains some other chemistries that inhibit the covid virus.

The majority of anti-viral food and Herb chemistries do work to suppress the SARS-CoV 2 virus from going covid though. That way when you get the virus, you still build up immunity to the virus too. What I am now seeing in the medical industry is a lot of Bull crap, that is not real medicine. Doctors are busy, they do not usually have the time to do the research I do, and even if they know this stuff, if they were to start telling people they would yank their license. Because consensus of the time governs medical practice, right now these agencies governing medicine and the pharma companies are making people believe that our immune systems are crap, that we must take medicines they say are necessary or we will die. Medicines are designed to fix one problem but which can cause other problems they are not required to test for.

Focus on what we say, do not stray from focusing where we tell you to focus on. Science has only scratched the complexity of the human metabolism and immune system functions, it took millions of years of evolution to build us to what we are today, we are not inferior in that department, if there is a problem, it is because science created so many unnatural chemicals and convinced people they are safe when they are not really safe. This virus is most likely something that science created, and science created the means to spread it worldwide quickly too.

I am not anti-science by any means, but I do understand that science does get hijacked by some people who are trying to make lots of bucks and are not analyzing the changes they are creating well enough.

a reply to: daskakik

Dude don't you remember your argument with mother may eye about a month ago???

There is a strong T cell response when vaccinated for COVID 19.

They don't recover fast. Low lymphocyte counts (t cells, b cells, natural killer cells) showed up for me 3 months after JNJ shot.

a reply to: 727Sky

I did a search on gamma globulin and found some info that might be helpful to people suffering from covid 19 and vaccine related immuno deficiencies...

"Conclusion: IVIG has demonstrated clinical efficacy on critical ill patients with COVID-19. There may be a relationship between the efficacy of IVIG and the COVID-19 disease severity. Well-designed clinical trials to identify the clinical and biochemical characteristics in COVID-19 patients' population that could benefit from IVIG are warranted in the future."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

a reply to: InachMarbank
Maybe some people's don't, mine did.

Maybe there was something else going on with the person in the vid and you. I know they didn't follow up, did you?

ETA: Actually I didn't recall the exchange with mothermayeye but looked it up, I mentioned what you had said about low lymphocytes after covid infection, but I don't know where the years to get back to normal is coming from and I certainly didn't discuss that with them.

a reply to: daskakik

I only got the test done yesterday. I won't be searching for follow up results until April or May 2022.

The article where I'm getting the 2 year recovery time is here.

"In the first period following haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), (such as what can occur with an infection) immune cells follow a predictable course of reconstitution. In contrast to the relatively early recovery of innate immune cells, recipients of HCT experience prolonged deficiencies in T cells and B cells, which can take more than 2 years to fully recover."

www.nature.com...

Have you gotten a white blood cell differential test, and complete white blood count test, since being vaccinated, or since suffering a covid 19 infection?

Of course that's confidential information. Feel free not to answer. But if you want to answer, I would be interested. I shared my results in that other thread.

a reply to: InachMarbank
Haematopoietic cell transplantation is an extreme situation, not the run of the mill infection.

I posted some lab results in that other thread as well. All normal except for HGB a little high.

I asked for a white blood cell differential test but they didn't understand, I live in a spanish speaking country and the direct translation didn't ring any bells with the people at the lab.

It did show lymphocytes and those were normal.

ETA: It also seems people are not grasping what a follow up is. If something is really off in the lab results they do cultures and other tests immediately to try and figure out why the results are like that, if they suspect something that needs attention, not whenever a person's next physical is.

a reply to: daskakik

If you don't mind sharing, what was your total white blood cell count? Then once you know that, they should give you % numbers for:
Lymphocytes
Monocytes
Neutrophils
My lymphocytes had too low a %, IMO, which was 11%. However I had such a high white blood cell count, that 11% still shows me with enough to get by with for the moment.
There is nothing to immediately follow up on, because there is no immediate emergency.
I will check back in a few months to see if there are changes.
If I were to get hit with a covid infection once a year, and hit with a booster shot once a year, each of those incidents is going to elicit a strong T cell response from my immune system (a lymphocyte)
My concern is it looks like a very real threat, that over time, these incidents will wear down my T cells faster than they can recover.
This might soon become a major problem for all of civilisation. Like a worldwide AIDS epidemic that is transmitted by air, and also reinforced with needles.
It is not good enough to just be anti vax, although I am anti vax. I must also strive to avoid covid infection.
Living in a high population density is probably the biggest covid risk... And spending too much time indoors with no fresh air, and poor ventilation.

a reply to: InachMarbank
My WBC count was 8.74% (ref range 4.00-10.00) lymphocytes were 34.7% (ref range 20-40). Nowhere near low 11 days after the 2nd jab.

Of course you don't have to do a follow up but that leaves you without knowing why your WBC count is the way it is. It might have nothing to do with the jabs but this can't be known without looking into it. Not really enough to claim that the vaccines are causing acquired immune deficiency.

a reply to: daskakik

For adults, normal lymphocyte count is between 1,000 and 4,800 lymphocytes per microliter of blood.

That is the absolute count (not %). With me coming in at 1300 lymphocytes per microliter of blood, both doctors I've consulted with don't see it as something to raise alarm about.

My ratio is below standard range, but absolute count is within standard range.

My count was low 101 days after janssen jab.

My alarming heart poundings began immediately after the jab.

They have increased in frequency since.

Perhaps I would benefit from some gamma globulin, but I doubt any doc will prescribe it unless my condition worsens.

a reply to: InachMarbank
My absolute lymphocyte count was at 3,040, like I said, 11 days after the second jab.

Alarming heart pounding sounds like something that does deserve an immediate look at. Without that follow up there is nothing but speculation about what it could be, that is why I brought it up in regards to the video in the OP.

The fishy thing is that the doc in the vid either didn't do a follow up or did it and it showed something different because the next vid on this issue was him saying the original vid was "just an observation" with no other lab results shown.

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: Dalamax

Estimates are that several hundred thousand lives were saved

Prove it.

Estimates are that 1 in 3 people suffer vaccine anxiety and require therapy.

a reply to: AaarghZombies

You just can't stand that Trump's vax is saving lives, can you.

Well, the data is in, and hundreds of thousands of lives have been saved.

Here's some links form outside of the US, where people are able to seperate science form hatred of Trump.

Link

Link

Warp Speed has saved more lives than all of your liberal socialist nanny state regulations.

😂🤣😂🤣🤣

You can’t even research who your jawing off at and where they stand, let’s just assume the answer is control and that’s how they can all get along now....

🙄😁🤣😂🤣😂🤣