It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: yuppa
Pretty small Nuclear Subterrene.
Russia apparently toyed with the idea 1964.
Then there is the RAND corps Bechtel shenanigans.
Be quite the piece of kit if we could build and operate such a thing all the same.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
…This convoy originated from the direction of Lockheed Martin along hillsborough avenue (92).
Three trucks were being escorted with exactly similar covered container box.
originally posted by: McGinty
Why so many police vans, rather than cars?
I wonder if they were transporting more police, or just contained the driver?
If they were empty then what were they thinking might fill them?
Maybe so many empty vans strengthens the argument for them being measures against potential protestors; they’d want somewhere to put the protestors.
originally posted by: McGinty
a reply to: Soloprotocol
The size of the convoy certainly justifies the warhead explanation. But conversely shoving them on the back of a truck seems a bit precarious for something so dangerous and valuable. Also, wouldn’t there be a large military presence in the convoy? I’m asking because I honestly haven’t a clue 🍺