It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A culture of silence and fear stops people learning what really can happen when you undergo ‘sex change’ operations.
There are unseen victims . . . their misery is facilitated by a lack of open discussion and a censorship of the facts.
irreversible physical damage and pain, which often leads to them committing suicide
Many young people today believe (and are being taught) that they can elect their sex like they choose an item of clothing, and go through with ‘surgery’ that will wholly transform them.
With male-to-female surgeries, post operative complications occur at a rate of 32.5% . . . and there is a re-operation rate of 21.7%.
GRAPHIC CONTENT WARNING
The patient’s “neovagina” is partly constructed from an inverted scrotum and penis, therefore any hair-bearing skin used for the “neo-urethra” can cause chronic infection and obstruction. In vaginoplasty, failure to perform preoperative or intraoperative hair removal can lead to inaccessible hair deep within the vagina. This can result in a hairball, which can be a nidus for debris and infection. Infections are common and known to be incredibly painful
[...]
Source
In a procedure called colovaginoplasty, a lubricant is sourced by opening up the abdomen and using part of the colon to join the gap and make the vagina. The lubrication comes from the bowel, and is constant
originally posted by: jensouth31
I’m sure many, many who have chosen that option for a full blown sex change have at times regretted their decision, although I wonder if they would admit to it? Interesting 🤔
originally posted by: butcherguy
So if a guy was unlucky enough to hook up with a man that had surgically converted to female, he would end up having bowel sex with.... her?
Gross.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: butcherguy
So if a guy was unlucky enough to hook up with a man that had surgically converted to female, he would end up having bowel sex with.... her?
Gross.
It's all good....it's a leaky, lubricating bowel with possible hairballs...
originally posted by: jensouth31
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: butcherguy
So if a guy was unlucky enough to hook up with a man that had surgically converted to female, he would end up having bowel sex with.... her?
Gross.
It's all good....it's a leaky, lubricating bowel with possible hairballs...
I think I just puked in my coffee cup!
How very disgusting 🤢🤮
Hey.... I don’t want any backlash over my green.. vomit emojis. I think they are appropriate here! lol
Medical ethics in Western medicine have traditionally concerned six major principles, all of which are in the Hippocratic oath: reverence for our teachers and consideration towards our colleagues; the command “first, do no harm”; absolute regard for life; restriction to field of expertise; abuse of privilege; and respect for privacy. In addition Hippocratic medicine is pious, serene, and centres solely on the individual.
Modern medicine lacks piety and serenity.
Have you heard about the new “Super Straight” movement? I hadn’t until yesterday in fact. Very interesting and it is already gaining significant traction, as well as more than its fair share of detractors, or more like angry hate filled people.
So, what exactly is Super Straight? Let’s find out, shall we?
From RedState:
“The LGBT activist community has convinced many that being straight is out of style and that in order to be trendy you have to identify as something. Your sexuality is now your identity, and the younger the age group the more this thinking has infected people.
According to the LGBT community, any choice in identity must be respected to the point of being revered. It can never be questioned or criticized. To be of any kind of sexuality makes one a higher being.”
But hold on just a minute, in true Leftist-LGBTQ fashion, this is most definitely not true. All “genders, sexualities, and identities” are protected – unless you so happen to be a straight male or female, then all bets are off.
Super Straight is simply those who are only attracted to and will only date a person of the opposite gender who was born as that gender. By the LGBTQ’s own rules, a persons sexuality must be respected.
...
‘“Super Straight’ started as a joke by a TikTok user trying to logic out a way for LGBT people to respect straight people. The video soon went viral, resulting in a host of users jumping on the bandwagon to identify as Super Straight themselves. This also created a backlash effect from the LGBT community who began reportedly sending death threats to the original uploader of the idea, as well as threatening his mother’s business.”
So if one announces that one is a man, even though you are a woman, that choice must be respected, even celebrated. Or if you state you are non-binary, a dog, a child even though you are in your 30s, you like both sexes (these examples are real BTW), and on, and on, and on – these choices must be respected. I could claim to be a piece of furniture with human tendencies and that would be ok. Heaven forbid if you “identify” as straight however.
...
Oh please be serious. This is exactly what I am talking about here, any disagreement with the LGBTQ and you are hateful, a Nazi, a detestable human being etc. It’s extremely hateful to be cisgender, meaning one is attracted to only the opposite sex, specifically those born as the opposite sex. Anyone identifying as what God created them to be, namely a man or a woman that likes the opposite sex, that is one who was born a man or a woman – well these audacious people are haters, they are transphobic, and they are deeply hateful of all LGBTQ people.
It couldn’t be that this is simply what and whom they “identify” as right?
“The LGBTA Wiki wrote, ‘While some cisgender individuals who identify with this term are supportive of transgender individuals, it is still not appropriate to use this term, as it has been overtaken by exclusionists and TERFS. It is also unneeded, as having a preference for cisgender people does not require a label.” Critics of the term say that cisgender people don’t face discrimination in society and, thus, don’t need a label.”
originally posted by: CrazeeWorld777
a reply to: trollz
When will these tarns people ever admit that they have Mental Health issues?