The pyramid and other structures how they worked

a reply to: Harte

Just a pile of rocks? What a pile of absolute closed minded
academic bullsh1t.

" Oh no paradigm is threatened!"

WHAH!

Grow up Harte!

a reply to: Randyvine

True we are looking more like a cargo cult, Is it a coincidence That Ra and Rama seem very similar with regards to names.
Rama built a bridge to Sri Lanka with the help of monkey men, were we the monkey men?

a reply to: anonentity

It's that oh so guarded only for the retarded secular paradigm
of unscientific closed minded attitudes that really piss me off.

It isn't even science and the only reason for it has to be fear.
Fear of what? Obviously something people like Harte wouldn't
have the authority to even understand. He doesn't even know
he's just a buffer.

Real science doesn't just blow off any new findings like a bunch
of pissy snobs. Real science gets involved. The thing is there's so
much they couldn't hide it all. And it's taken the rest of us this
long to know something is missing. Only because they couldn't
hide it all.

There isn't any other reason they don't embrace any new hypothesis.
Of course the stones would have to fit together so tightly. if conducive
connectivity is a goal. And if one can pour stone in to place then one
knows about grout and mortar. I think they knew about all these technics
and had to build this way by design. And the design required construction
that would serve it's purpose. And that purpose served the living not the
dead. I could be wrong but I bet that's closer to the truth than people
like Harte even understand. Under their self imposed limited thinking.


Robert Schoch one of the best on planet earth.

a reply to: Randyvine

I agree with what you have said, but in many ways, the attitude is understandable all of life's preconceived paradises are at stake and if you are not mentally prepared then you have nothing left. Just to put the boot in a little more, at thirteen minutes into this Vid, you have an interesting paradox that is a bit mind-blowing with regards to the polygonal walls. It shows that they are not polygonal at all if the small details on the sidewalls looking down the centre are mirrored in detail at a site in Egypt and South America, then they were planned that way from the start of the construction and not a random occurrence.

The whole vid deals with mathematics and reaches an interesting conclusion with regards to the magnetic reversal .

a reply to: anonentity

It's just a pile of rocks!

Buhahahahahahahahahahah!

a reply to: Randyvine

They are getting scared now.

a reply to: anonentity

Holy mother of God!

WoW Like I was just saying, There is something the powers that be
are hiding. And I bet my life it's something they would kill us all to
keep us from knowing,

If we were able to organize a meeting at the Great Pyramid. That
had people from all over the world make a pilgrimage to the plateau.
Where we would then demand access and if denied. We were ready
take it by force? Because the world is done being kept in the dark
by wicked people?

I bet they'd slaughter us all.

But that wouldn't keep me from trying because the
secrets have to stop. I heard there's white black widows
down there though so I would help organize the pilgrimage
as far as the plateau. But I'd runaway screaming like little
girl if even saw one those damn things

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: Harte

Just a pile of rocks? What a pile of absolute closed minded
academic bullsh1t.

" Oh no paradigm is threatened!"

WHAH!

Grow up Harte!

Me grow up?
Who's drooling over a pile of rocks here?

Harte

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: anonentity

It's that oh so guarded only for the retarded secular paradigm
of unscientific closed minded attitudes that really piss me off.

It isn't even science and the only reason for it has to be fear.
Fear of what? Obviously something people like Harte wouldn't
have the authority to even understand. He doesn't even know
he's just a buffer.

Real science doesn't just blow off any new findings like a bunch
of pissy snobs. Real science gets involved. The thing is there's so
much they couldn't hide it all. And it's taken the rest of us this
long to know something is missing. Only because they couldn't
hide it all.

There isn't any other reason they don't embrace any new hypothesis.
Of course the stones would have to fit together so tightly. if conducive
connectivity is a goal. And if one can pour stone in to place then one
knows about grout and mortar. I think they knew about all these technics
and had to build this way by design. And the design required construction
that would serve it's purpose. And that purpose served the living not the
dead. I could be wrong but I bet that's closer to the truth than people
like Harte even understand. Under their self imposed limited thinking.


Robert Schoch one of the best on planet earth.

The rant of the ignorant.
You don't even know the OLD findings and you claim there are NEW findings here (there aren't.)

Harte

Ahem that was covered in polished limestone originally as you well know. The great pyramid is actually 8 sided, but the angle is subtle it’s barely noticeable.

I know you know nothing about engineering or construction so I get why you can’t appreciate the skills involved.

a reply to: Harte

Me grow up?
Who's drooling over a pile of rocks here?

Harte

Well I guess you told me. I find it bit odd that someone
with your education would refer to one of the seven
ancient wonders of the world as a pile of rocks. You're
actually butt hurt.

It must suck to know that years of telling people what
to believe about a pile of rocks. Is about make you look
like an ignoramus. But that's how it goes when you pay
to be told what to think.

a reply to: surfer_soul


It's eight-sided because when the sun shines across it at the very minuets of the equinoxes twice a year the Pyramid has one half of its face in shadow with the terminator line right down the middle of the face ...which makes it a perfect clock as well.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: Harte

Me grow up?
Who's drooling over a pile of rocks here?

Harte

Well I guess you told me. I find it bit odd that someone
with your education would refer to one of the seven
ancient wonders of the world as a pile of rocks. You're
actually butt hurt.

It must suck to know that years of telling people what
to believe about a pile of rocks. Is about make you look
like an ignoramus. But that's how it goes when you pay
to be told what to think.

I never paid anyone to be told what to think.
And I'm not butt hurt at all. YOU are the one calling people names for disagreeing with you.
On the other hand, it is a nice stack of rocks.

Now, do tell us about new hypotheses that "they" won't accept. And maybe while your at it you could show us that you know the old hypotheses and the current ones that they did or do accept.

Harte

a reply to: Harte

I never paid anyone to be told what to think.
And I'm not butt hurt at all. YOU are the one calling people names for disagreeing with you.
On the other hand, it is a nice stack of rocks.

Now, do tell us about new hypotheses that "they" won't accept. And maybe while your at it you could show us that you know the old hypotheses and the current ones that they did or do accept.

Why so you can wax me down with your superior education?
When I've already made my point. That you haven't refuted in
the least? No calling it a pile of rocks and then redacting
that won't do. The great pyramid was no tomb for any
Pharaoh ever. That's all I need to know not to trust what you
learnt.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: Harte

I never paid anyone to be told what to think.
And I'm not butt hurt at all. YOU are the one calling people names for disagreeing with you.
On the other hand, it is a nice stack of rocks.

Now, do tell us about new hypotheses that "they" won't accept. And maybe while your at it you could show us that you know the old hypotheses and the current ones that they did or do accept.

Why so you can wax me down with your superior education?
When I've already made my point. That you haven't refuted in
the least? No calling it a pile of rocks and then redacting
that won't do. The great pyramid was no tomb for any
Pharaoh ever. That's all I need to know not to trust what you
learnt.

What point was that? Is your point that it's not stacked rocks?
So, what are those big heavy things stacked up that it's made out of?

Also, you dodged the question (and rather clumsily.) You don't wish to elaborate on how "THEY" won't accept some hypothesis or the other?

All the Giza pyramids were absolutely tombs, or cenotaphs at the very least. The evidence for this is completely overwhelming. Is this your "hypothesis" THEY won't accept?

Harte

a reply to: Harte

Overwhelming yet not even believable. Archeologists just arrive
from Europe and tell the people who's own history says it isn't
known who built The Great Pyramid. So they forged the name
Khufu in the pyramid of "Cheops" never a mummy there. And you
want to claim you know how it was built when there's no way we
could match anything even close to it today? Pile of rocks?

Dude your credibility is crap. It was truth to people in the
1820s. But it's crap today. Copper chisels? You're pathetic!

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: Harte

Overwhelming yet not even believable. Archeologists just arrive
from Europe and tell the people who's own history says it isn't
known who built The Great Pyramid. So they forged the name
Khufu in the pyramid of "Cheops" never a mummy there. And you
want to claim you know how it was built when there's no way we
could match anything even close to it today? Pile of rocks?

Dude your credibility is crap. It was truth to people in the
1820s. But it's crap today. Copper chisels? You're pathetic!

It's exactly as I suspected.

You have no idea why certain hypotheses are accepted and why others never will be.

Here's a hint - evidence.

You go on and on about people who know a million times what you know about Egypt not accepting some ridiculous hypotheses (Giza Power Plant? Aliens built it? 800,000 years old?) when you don't even know WHY the mainstream's position is what it is.

You want to act like some old farts just decided the current paradigm because it's easy and doesn't threaten their tenure.

Harte

a reply to: surfer_soul

Thats what makes it funny, intentionally.

Besides, my history textbook says that the pharoh used slaves to build the pyramids.

Which is kind of weird considering he could've just used bricks or something.

a reply to: Harte

Evidence? We're both adults here Harte. So I do credit you
with knowing as I do that evidence. When it conflicts with the truth inside of you
should never be your conclusion. And never let it close your mind. Stop trying
to be the big authority. And don't bother with your evidence I've seen it before.

Nothing should close your mind and that's where you're wrong.

ETA

You go on and on about people who know a million times what you know about Egypt not accepting some ridiculous hypotheses (Giza Power Plant? Aliens built it? 800,000 years old?) when you don't even know WHY the mainstream's position is what it is.

Even a million times what I know doesn't mean anybody with a
pulse today knows much. But sometimes it's more what you know
isn't it? At least I know that rather than look for the builders or even
how it was built. I would look for the designer first. Because that pile
of rocks had to have a designer. And if there is no record of it any
where in history? Then it isn't a part of our history. Because if a
Pharaoh was responsible for it? You couldn't miss it. It would be
glorified in Egyptian history and in the hieroglyphs some where.

It was a wonder in ancient times even. I don't understand what's wrong
with academia. You can't just flick a switch and say the knowledge
is over that's it we know it all. Not with out looking highly suspect.
You don't own history.

originally posted by: Randyvine
a reply to: Harte

Evidence? We're both adults here Harte. So I do credit you
with knowing as I do that evidence. When it conflicts with the truth inside of you
should never be your conclusion.

See, this is what I'm talking about.
You're gonna rant against the Mainstream for not ignoring evidence? They should have gone with their gut feeling?

In that case, whose gut feeling are we talking about here and who gets to decide that and what would that decision be based on?

originally posted by: Randyvine And never let it close your mind.

Here you imply that the Mainstream view is held by the closed-minded. You must be unaware of the hundreds of changes in the Mainstream view that have taken place over the last century - most of it in the last 50 years or so.
What do you think Egyptologists do? Spend their careers trying to preserve an outdated view?

How do you think archaeological careers are furthered? By not making any new discoveries?

originally posted by: Randyvine
Stop trying to be the big authority. And don't bother with your evidence I've seen it before.

Nothing should close your mind and that's where you're wrong.

You've "seen the evidence." Have you "seen the evidence" contrary to the Mainstream view?
Where's the evidence provided by your gut feeling?
Never mind. You probably flushed it away.

originally posted by: Randyvine
Even a million times what I know doesn't mean anybody with a
pulse today knows much. But sometimes it's more what you know
isn't it? At least I know that rather than look for the builders or even
how it was built. I would look for the designer first. Because that pile
of rocks had to have a designer.

Somehow you have imagined that Egyptologists don't care to look for this designer.

There's more than one Egyptologist in Egypt. Egyptology can do 2 things at once now. Even more than two!

originally posted by: RandyvineAnd if there is no record of it any
where in history? Then it isn't a part of our history. Because if a
Pharaoh was responsible for it? You couldn't miss it. It would be
glorified in Egyptian history and in the hieroglyphs some where.

Khufu's glorification was done in his funerary temple in front of his tomb, as had been customary for centuries in the Old Kingdom. There's barely anything left of it, but parts of it - with inscriptions - have been found in other buildings built several centuries later.
Papyrus is notoriously short lived as a medium.

However, you are correct, in a literal sense.
Technically, anything not written is not part of our history, since "History" begins with writing.
That is not license to invent some gut feeling idea though.

originally posted by: Randyvine
It was a wonder in ancient times even. I don't understand what's wrong
with academia. You can't just flick a switch and say the knowledge
is over that's it we know it all. Not with out looking highly suspect.
You don't own history.

There's nothing "wrong" with Academia.There's something wrong with your image of Academia.
Believe me, there's no one in Academia that works to preserve someone else's hypothesis - with the exception of working to test that hypothesis.

Understand that an individual in Academia MUST defend any hypothesis they have.
It's their role in the process. That's how science works.

Harte