Skinny Bob Colorized and New Details

Then, what are you even doing here ? (if you don't want to believe ? ) a reply to: eletheia

a reply to: spiritualarchitect

You clearly have read this thread rather selectively.
Feel free to re-read the multiple comments about likely CGI again - or not. I'm guessing you'll choose the latter option.
...and you seem to have quite a predisposition on your own point of view about the the probability of aliens visiting earth.

I honestly and politely suggest you re-read the post that you made that I'm replying to and have a think about what you've said.
You've gone as a far as stating - "There is an anti-alien agenda on ATS, a group of posters who are here to keep the government story intact. They spend a lot of time here year after year doing their anti-alien thing. I don't believe in demons or zombies, but I do not spend hours on threads provoking, hassling or attacking people about it. Then again maybe that is why this site exist, specifically to keep the alien idea as a joke. After all the owner/head honcho's name is Skeptical Overlord. Keep watch and see which ones attack this post."

...so you've effectively said that people who disagree with you - for whatever reason, are part of some agenda to suppress truth (as you see it, or define it).

It's a laughable statement and pretty pathetic really.
It sounds like a comment from someone who is frustrated that their ideas get attacked or argued against by others.

...have you ever considered that others that disagree with you may have started from similar view points to you and changed their minds over time ?
They also may not - it's up to individuals to decide their own points of view on a given subject.

Trying to draw conclusions based on someone's (online) user name - which is simply a handle or avatar are again - pretty damn pathetic. I have no connection to the owner's or people who run this site, but what logical connection can you possibly make between a label and someone's agenda or thinking ?

You have taken offense at other people's arguments and then offered basically a paranoid "everyone's trying to suppress the truth" style of argument to bolster you own thinking in why people disagree with you.

The last thing I'm going to say to you directly, as I see zero value in communicating with someone with an entrenched view, is you should consider how objective you are and if you are genuinely considering all points of view on a subject, or simply the ones that conform with your own current point of view.

All the best.

Of course if we see it from our human point of view, nothing would ever make sense, ''anti-gravitational tech'' , ''opening wormholes'' , 'hovering for hours'' , etc... That's the problem, most of us we think nothing is possible because we compare with what we currently know, think about that. a reply to: eletheia

a reply to: ObliviousMAn

..it's called a public discussion forum.
which involves - you know, the public, not just people that agree with you.

I hope that helps...

originally posted by: eletheia
that Judy NEVER worked for NASA.

I never wrote that Judy worked there.

Thanks, it does. a reply to: muzj03

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

I never wrote that Judy worked there.

From your post......

I know that if someone working for NASA revealed an alien code they wold go through all the same dirt Judy went through too. But I do not think NASA is listening to the stars anyway, not more than just for the cover-up. Why listen to far away planets when They are RIGHT HERE on Earth. I think SETI is all about listening to the local ET's - the ones on Mars, the Moon and those already on Earth.

Short memory?

a reply to: eletheia
"Seems you didn't look far enough back to before you left James behind...."
"To date no primary witnesses have been traced, while the supporting documents, some obvious fakes, were all obtained from James van Greunen."
Sorry, didn't see your comment and it's worth addressing. You're just highlighting all the things you agree with but did you bother to fact check any of this? I tried and could not verify the claim of supporting documents.
I would love to see them but I've thoroughly checked over 100 links pertaining to skinny bob looking for any shreds of information. That's why I consider Judy to be a dead end. A surprising amount of details were figured out by me, not tryna brag but im proud of myself for that and disappointed in others for not finding it sooner.

a reply to: ObliviousMAn

it'd be more accurate to say he wants to disbelieve.

until and unless someone presents absolute and incontrovertible proof of this footage being hoaxed/cgi/animatronic or in any way not legit, i lean to believing that it is (legit). skinny bob for president!

originally posted by: Zadiel74
Maybe the Skinny Bob video is the unseen HolloMan Air Force Base footage.

WE HAVE LIFTOFF!

1954 EISENHOWER's EDWARDS MEETING - (I have added this for clarification of the different meetings)

"The first meeting with the aliens and President Eisenhower occurred at Edwards AFB in February 1954. Navy Commander Charles L. Suggs reported that his father had attended the meeting between Ike and the ETs. Eisenhower met with two Nordic appearing, blue-eyed ETs. A third one stood near the door as a lookout.

The discussions were polite. Eisenhower wanted to effectuate a treaty with the aliens, but was unwilling to agree to their demand that we cease testing nuclear weapons. The aliens left with no treaty in place, but returned the next year to Holloman AFB in New Mexico, not too far from the famous Roswell alien aircraft crash site, for a subsequent meeting with Eisenhower."

IF this is true then Vacation Bob can be ruled out. Nordics not Greys. Nordics, like the one that Hitler met after the Freiburg crash. The one he called "Superman".

1955 EISENHOWER'S HOLLOMAN MEETING

"There were Several Eyewitness Reports of a second meeting between Ike and ETs at Holloman AFB in New Mexico, which is only about 120 miles from the well-known Roswell incident. The reports are more detailed than the ones provided for the Edwards AFB meeting.

In February 1955, approximately 300 people saw Air Force One land at Holloman AFB and taxi back out to the end of the runway. Shortly after the plane landed, the pilot instructed the tower to turn off all radar while the president’s plane was on the tarmac. Shortly after Air Force One landed, and the radar was turned off, three round objects were seen in the sky. One landed about 200 feet in front of Air Force One, another hovered over the area as though keeping watch, and a third one disappeared from visibility.

A man, presumed to be Eisenhower, descended the steps of Air Force One.

He was seen shaking hands with a being at the door of the saucer, then entering the unusual saucer-shaped aircraft. Ike was in the saucer for about 45 minutes.

When he left, he was not wearing a hat and was clearly visible to many observers. All witnesses recognized him as President Eisenhower."


1964 THE NON-EISENHOWER HOLLOMAN EVENT - (Now check this out)


"In 1964, Three UFOs Flew Into The Air Space At Holloman AFB. They were tracked on radar and actually Captured On Film. One seemed to wobble and eventually landed at the AFB. Three humanoids with blue-gray complexions, dressed in tight-fitting flight suits, were met by the Air Force base commander and four other officers. The aliens stayed for several days and their aircraft was purportedly repaired. What was discussed in the meetings is still a mystery."

So there it is. Real or not, surely this is what the Vacation Video is based on. The 3 ET's and the 5 humans = 7 walking with 1 filming. As for the Bob vid, I think at one point he is being measured for height. So would these ET's be measured for height while they were awaiting the repair of their saucer? They were there for several days so I see no reason to think not. It also means that if real, there is a lot more film footage of them there that we have not seen.

Refer to the link for more info:

www.gaia.com...

originally posted by: muzj03
a reply to: spiritualarchitect

You clearly have read this thread rather selectively.
Feel free to re-read the multiple comments about likely CGI again - or not. I'm guessing you'll choose the latter option.
...and you seem to have quite a predisposition on your own point of view about the the probability of aliens visiting earth.

I honestly and politely suggest you re-read the post that you made that I'm replying to and have a think about what you've said.
You've gone as a far as stating - "There is an anti-alien agenda on ATS, a group of posters who are here to keep the government story intact. They spend a lot of time here year after year doing their anti-alien thing. I don't believe in demons or zombies, but I do not spend hours on threads provoking, hassling or attacking people about it. Then again maybe that is why this site exist, specifically to keep the alien idea as a joke. After all the owner/head honcho's name is Skeptical Overlord. Keep watch and see which ones attack this post."

...so you've effectively said that people who disagree with you - for whatever reason, are part of some agenda to suppress truth (as you see it, or define it).

It's a laughable statement and pretty pathetic really.
It sounds like a comment from someone who is frustrated that their ideas get attacked or argued against by others.

...have you ever considered that others that disagree with you may have started from similar view points to you and changed their minds over time ?
They also may not - it's up to individuals to decide their own points of view on a given subject.

Trying to draw conclusions based on someone's (online) user name - which is simply a handle or avatar are again - pretty damn pathetic. I have no connection to the owner's or people who run this site, but what logical connection can you possibly make between a label and someone's agenda or thinking ?

You have taken offense at other people's arguments and then offered basically a paranoid "everyone's trying to suppress the truth" style of argument to bolster you own thinking in why people disagree with you.

The last thing I'm going to say to you directly, as I see zero value in communicating with someone with an entrenched view, is you should consider how objective you are and if you are genuinely considering all points of view on a subject, or simply the ones that conform with your own current point of view.

All the best.

UFO community has been compromised, infliltrated and then ridiculed numerous of times. Disinfo campaign on the biggest paranormal forums where one of the finests researchers keep lurking wouldn't surprise me at all.

originally posted by: muzj03

#1 You clearly have read this thread rather selectively.
...and you seem to have quite a predisposition on your own point of view about the the probability of aliens visiting earth.

#2 ...so you've effectively said that people who disagree with you - for whatever reason, are part of some agenda to suppress truth (as you see it, or define it).

#3 Trying to draw conclusions based on someone's (online) user name - which is simply a handle or avatar.

#4 You have taken offense

4 = YOU clearly have. When I wrote "Keep watch and see which ones attack this post." I certainly was not thinking of you.

3 = Get real. He is the OWNER. This is his site. He spent his money on it. Do you think he willy nilly picked his name out of the air without thought or meaning behind it at all. His user name shows clearly where he stands. He is the Overlord of the Skeptics. An "Overlord" is a ruler. A "Ruler" is a commander. He commands the Skeptics. That means that it is possible that this is a skeptics website. Now you do know that the internet is a business and that other business do work on it and you do know that the government and the military are both a business. And you do know that business on the internet will employ people to keep watch over how their business is viewed by those on the outside. The mil/gov has a reason to downplay the alien agenda and they pay people to keep it under control. A group of those employees post on this website.

2 = You are making it too general. As I stated hours ago, I am only talking about a certain group of posters. It is a small segment compared to the overall whole. And as far as I know, you are not in it. At least not yet. : )

1 = YOU clearly have read this thread rather selectively. If you had read the entire thread you would have seen the reason for my predisposition about aliens visiting earth. THERE HERE. So the next step is to try and figure out what they are doing. It is a game of speculation and yes, it can be very frustrating, when the opposition is always trying to flip the board over. But it can be a fun guessing game, you might try it sometime.

a reply to: KiwiNite
Well said. In fact you have a lot of good sayings:

"His opinion matters to me as much as opinion of my postman or a random cashier at the store."

"Well if it is then that's like bragging about 9 inches and offering 2."

"If people like you were in charge humans would never fly or go to space because it's impossible."

originally posted by: spiritualarchitect

1 = YOU clearly have read this thread rather selectively. If you had read the entire thread you would have seen the reason for my predisposition about aliens visiting earth. THERE HERE. So the next step is to try and figure out what they are doing. It is a game of speculation and yes, it can be very frustrating, when the opposition is always trying to flip the board over. But it can be a fun guessing game, you might try it sometime.

You are totally disingenuous about what others are doing and that they are

reading selectively, that is 'your opinion' and as such far, very far from fact.

If indeed you are reading all posts, as am I yours appear to be the most

selective.....and yes that is an opinion, my opinion, BUT it also seems to

be the opinion of others by their reply posts on this thread.


"The're here" Really? Again only 'your opinion' not FACT.

The only thing in life that requires faith rather than fact is religion......


Every time I read your posts my brain screams "How old are you?"

We are very close to enhancing our own minds with direct connection to super-AI and the Internet, in which case we wouldn't need big heads. So why would an even more advanced culture need big, heavy heads? Big Head Aliens! We are still thinking 1950s scifi. BTW, those crashed saucers are obvious plants since again, our tech could duplicate them in about 50 yrs. So what is the chance an intersteller race would just happen to be only 50 yrs ahead of us? We are being fooled, either by real aliens who are far beyond our scifi visions, or by govt for some deeper reason.

originally posted by: KansasGirl
Others have mentioned it: why is there a noise from a projector? If his is a digital camera recording of a projected movie, there shouldnt be loud projector noise, should there?

So has anyone done a deep dive analysis on the audio?

There’s the reel. Can an audio expert break anything else out of it?

Maybe the “evidence” isn’t in what you see - it’s in what you hear (or don’t hear, for that matter).

Why does this matter? While I’m not equipped to parse audio I do know that mics pic up a top of random background noise that gets drowned out by the loudest noises - which is what you hear. If the sound is 100% nothing but clear reel click I’d suspect an overlay. If you can parse out a person breathing, ventilation or anything else then you might see the film differently.

If I was a forensic audio analyst I’d do it - but I’m not. And this warrants someone who is a a professional in that are to sort this out.

OP - thanks for your hard work on this in an apparently thankless world. Is it real? maybe - and thanks for helping me solidify the maybe. Whether it is or isn’t I appreciate your quest for understanding and taking the time to at minimum try to do it the right way.

I have no conclusions about whether Skinny Bob is real (I have my doubts) but there is definitely a pattern to some of these threads reviving old UFO myths mostly involving brand new accounts (and double accounts), bizzare tag teaming, sudden angry personal attacks, and bannings.

What is the Vacation Video?

a reply to: GapPlaylists

It starred Chevy Chase.