It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Claiming asylum and being granted asylum are two different things. Until then, you are here illegally.
originally posted by: Edumakated
a reply to: Frocharocha
So the NY Times is finally admitting there is a crisis at the border and we need a wall?
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
a reply to: Krakatoa
So, isn't the humane solution not to allow them into this country if they are destined to be treated worse the the fearful country they are fleeing?
Isn't the right thing not to treat people this way in the first place?
originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Fallingdown
This is Trump Administration policy and interpretation of the law. It has nothing to do with liberals.
This is Trump using children as pawns in his sick game of intimidation and torture as a deterrent of migration.
Any mention in that article that one of the main reasons for this is because Democrats in Congress refuse to support additional funding for CBP to operate these facilities?
originally posted by: cfnyaami
a reply to: Frocharocha
It's a disgusting abuse of power that the Trump administration has decided to do this to people, especially children. AND these prisons, for the most part, are for profit. Shine the light on these crimes against humanity.
John Kelly, the former chief of staff for President Donald Trump and the former head of the U.S. Southern Command in Doral, was spotted Thursday at the Homestead temporary shelter for immigrant children.
Protesters saw him entering the property on a golf cart.
The retired Marine Corps general’s unexpected visit to the the facility — which announced this week that it intends to expand and house as many as 3,200 kids at the “temporary” center — was confirmed by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. As the only temporary shelter in the country, the Homestead center skirts regulations limiting how long federal authorities can hold immigrant children.
originally posted by: Lysergic
Better send them back asap.
Problems solved
Its as coverup for this weeks DNC's Catastrophe in Columbia for the Democratic National Committee. A diversion.
we feel improving the conditions in these facilities would be the optimal solution.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
originally posted by: Lysergic
Better send them back asap.
Problems solved
...
When I think of things like this it makes me think that both parties are using these peoples lives as political leverage.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
originally posted by: xuenchen
Mexico needs to secure an emergency supply route directly to the camps 😎
If your saying mexico should help by giving them supplies. Great idea.
Mexico did promise to help with all this.
originally posted by: Lucidparadox
We need to release these people back to the lives they were living here in the US. Their valuable contributions to our GDP, and assistance to our workforce our overlooked.
It's awful that we are treating hard working people seeking a better life like garbage.
I can't believe we're holding children and babies in these facilities!
Let them go! Allow them to contribute to our amazing country!
Let freedom ring and prosperity be in their future!
This Nation was built on people just walking in here and setting up shop. It's how we became the world's symbol for liberty. Open the borders!
The case before the court stems from the Flores settlement — a consent decree signed by the government in 1997 that guarantees basic rights for children detained at the border. The Trump administration has repeatedly sought to undermine the two-decade-old agreement, in particular as it pursued its policy of family separation. Currently the administration is appealing a 2017 district court ruling that found the feds had violated Flores by not providing children access to basic toiletries and adequate sleeping conditions at temporary detention facilities operated by the Border Patrol.
As attorney Sarah Fabian of the Justice Department’s Office of Immigration Litigation haltingly attempted to make the Trump administration’s case in a San Francisco courtroom, she was hit with disbelieving questions from the three judges on the bench, Wallace Tashima, William Fletcher and Marsha Berzon.
Judge Berzon zeroed in on the sleep question, citing findings that the Border Patrol made children spend days in facilities with 24/7 artificial light, no beds, cold cement floors, and only an aluminum blanket for insulation. “You’re really going to stand up and tell us that being able to sleep isn’t a question of ‘safe and sanitary’ conditions?” Berzon asked. “You’re not really going to say that, right?”