posted on Nov, 13 2018 @ 08:27 AM
and just think those that have created the perfect fires (the so called environmentalists), are the same ones that are wanting to deal with the so
called human caused climate change. these people are truly dangerous, both to normal people, but also to the environment they are so intent on
protecting. the fact is this is why these people so concerned with the unproven theory, a theory many feel is based upon a poorly built house
of cards of bad data, wanting, and even trying to "fix" it, quite literally scare the piss out of me. just take a look at these fires as an
example of how badly their good intentions can cause far more harm than good. and if they can so badly mess up something as simple and basic as
forest management, how much worse could it be trying to fix or control something so complicated as weather and climate?
these horrendous fires are the direct result of people who think they are right. and anyone who believes different is wrong, and possibly even
needing to be dealt with. and i'll be honest, in the most part their hearts really are in the right place. and they are honestly trying to do
good. but as most intelligent people are aware, good intentions do not necessarily mean doing the right thing. we even say, "the road to hell is
paved with good intentions" because we know this. there is even another saying, "you can't see the forest for the trees". which paints a
good picture of such people. they are so concerned with saving certain species and such. that not only do they endanger other species to do so,
but in some cases even cause great harm to the species they are wanting to help. because they are so myopically focused on that one thing they fail to
see anything else. one part of nature is so inter connected with everything that this myopic view is harmful because you have to take everything into
account, and just not this and that one thing. and that by ignoring everything else what you do to help harms other aspects and in the end quite
likely that one or two things you are concentrating on. and we see this all the time with liberal ideals, especially when they are animal/nature
lovers. like those who would rather see an entire species go extinct due to over population than to allow people to hunt, to keep populations stable
at a sustainable level. just as we currently try so hard to protect forests by putting out every little fire and making a huge almost unstoppable and
destructive fire far more likely.
the simple fact is that we should NOT be putting out forest fires at all. in fact only trying to protect things such as houses and such,
leaving the rest to naturally burn as part of the normal life cycle. if we were to do so, once nature stabilizes from the human interference,
these fires would not be near as bad. and if a species get wiped out, that is nature at work. doing as it has been doing for thousands, or depending
on your belief millions, or even billions of years. in fact we should even question if we would be doing the right thing by protecting different
species by protecting them in things like zoos. which could be used to restart or help out the natural population. or by doing so, may we actually be
doing more harm than good?