-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

a reply to: RadioRobert

The big picture is that SHE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO LOSE.

But really, the secret society is simply the group of people working very, very hard to make sure she didn't lose, so they had to pull all kinds of strings to make sure the investigation came out the way it needed to. The investigation came out properly, but she still lost.

Does this lend credibility to the idea posted earlier Andy McCabe was a reluctant conspirator and possibly flipped?

Sorry form the string of posts... Just sort of thinking "aloud" here...

a reply to: ketsuko

The big picture is that SHE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO LOSE. 

No. I mean, yes, but why can't she lose? What was going to happen that Andy needed to have explained to him? "It might make her lose" was not beyond McCabe's cognitive ability. There's more.

We were discussing AT&T and the NSA earlier?

Following a resolved bid protest, the National Security Agency can now begin work with telecommunications giant AT&T on the second of three massive tech contracts that make up the agency’s classified Groundbreaker program.

The Government Accountability Office denied a protest last week, filed by losing bidder DXC Technology, allowing AT&T to begin executing on an IT contract that sources tell Nextgov could be worth up to $2 billion.

No wonder AT&T is greasing the NSA's wheels and pushing back where expected.

a reply to: RadioRobert

You've seen the graphic about how Obama was the first half of the 16 year plan to destroy the US? This nation is the biggest stumbling block in the NWO plan. They need to destroy us and they were working to do it "gently" by their way of thinking. Obama was the first half and Clinton was supposed to oversee the second.

The people we are talking about do not have loyalty to country. They have loyalty to a whole different set of masters, and that is their big picture. Work to usher in the NWO and assure themselves and their posterity a place in the coming ruling class (or at least the coming political bureaucrat class which would be the next best thing).

They were very close to having it fixed.

originally posted by: RadioRobert
Is Aaron, Aaron Cooper? Why is Strozk seeking his patronage? Has Cooper (or another Aaron) come up before? Not that I'm remembering.

Aaron Cooper manages to find himself in the middle of just about everything. Not just reporting it but in the middle of it.

a reply to: RadioRobert

The answer is really easy since Strzok proudly admitted that HRC might be the next president.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: RadioRobert

The answer is really easy since Strzok proudly admitted that HRC might be the next president.

"He just did not understand what the problem was"

McCabe was well aware of the political effects of the investigation and election. It's not that simple. There was a problem that would result from the investigation beyond "she might lose". He was apparently willing to take that chance at face value before Strozk worked him behind the scenes (using his words) and educated him on the problem.

At first I thought it might be his need to recuse himself, but the timeline doesn't add up. It's five months before he finally got pressured into that.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: RadioRobert

The big picture is that SHE WASN'T SUPPOSED TO LOSE.

But really, the secret society is simply the group of people working very, very hard to make sure she didn't lose, so they had to pull all kinds of strings to make sure the investigation came out the way it needed to. The investigation came out properly, but she still lost.

Thanks! That would explain why Liberal Twitter people and Liberal talking heads in the MSM are so offended by this relatively minor "Secret Society" subject. You'd think that someone had just stolen their Golden Goose. Jake Tapper (CNN) was especially off his rocker over it, from what I heard.

a reply to: Rikku

Assuming that it's possible that there could be eyeballs on this thread and that what we do in here could help make a difference out there, I'm hoping that you or some super creative ATS person who's also a Q-Trump follower, might take it upon themselves to undertake this assignment

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Because it's devolving from a research and presentation forum into a kind of chat discussion.

It would be so nice to have one totally KICK A$$ page in this thread which could be sent out into the verse, while drawing people here for IN-DEPTH analysis and further deep research, or maybe I'm hoping for too much from the newer ATS, not like the old ATS.

Do people still make those kinds of threads? with phenomenal presentation skills, links, pics, lists, formatting etc?

My interest here in this thread isn't to "famefag" as they call it over on the Chans but to try to be as helpful as possible. This is very very important and serious #!

More on Internet censorship. It looks like the government is really getting serious about getting involved.

The guy who made the meme with the kid biting into the Tide pod that says "This Is Why I Can't Pay for Your Health Insurance" got slapped with a 30-day suspension by facebook for violating its community standards.

And now Ted Cruz has stepped up.

Second, Sen. Ted Cruz reminds internet gatekeepers that they enjoy legal immunity under the Communications Decency Act (CDA) only on condition that internet gatekeepers are “a neutral public forum.” If they practice viewpoint censorship, they may be vulnerable to legal consequences without having recourse to problematic and cumbersome antitrust law.

“The pattern of political censorship we are seeing across the technology companies is highly concerning,” Sen. Cruz said in his closing remarks. “And the opening question I asked of whether you are a neutral public forum — if you are a neutral public forum, that does not allow for political editorializing and censorship. And if you are not a neutral public forum, the entire predicate for liability immunity under the CDA [Communications Decency Act] is claiming to be a neutral public forum, so you cannot have it both ways.”

So this is the third mention of censorship and government involvement in speech, second from the Senate.

originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Real piece of work that Strzok guy. Strzok text messages More evidence that McCabe could be the FBI informant.

FYI..Before signing off from his radio show at 6pm, Sean Hannity said that some explosive new information is arriving, via his "sources", and are being compiled for presentation on his Fox News TV show at 9pm (Eastern) tonight.

a reply to: RadioRobert

Think about it like this:

Do you recall the movie Pulp Fiction? There is the minor character played by Bruce Willis, a boxer. He's a minor character but integral to the overall plot. Crime boss Marcellus Wallace fixed the fight Willis's character fights in, and Willis's character is supposed to take the dive.

"Feel that sting? That's pride effing with ya. Well, eff pride!" says Marcellus Wallace.

Think of McCabe a bit like Willis's boxer, only in McCabe's case, while he might be perfectly willing to fix things for his ideology, he's not willing to sell out his country. His sting may very well be a latent streak of nationalism or patriotism even. He's not quite the NWO man the rest of his brethren are, and that's the problem keeping him from seeing the big picture.

That may be why he's the weak link ... if indeed he truly is.

Dinesh D'Souza claims political targeting.



And what ever did happen to the poor Benghazi video guy?

a reply to: ketsuko

jailed for a parole violation

a reply to: ketsuko

Nice. Very relevant to what Q posted today. On point. No wasted space.

How do we push an Internet Bill of Rights? Cruz has pointed out that by censoring, these Internet gatekeepers have forfeited their legal immunity.

What can we DO that's action oriented?

What do you make of Q's 2 posts today?

Keep it succinct. Graphics are always nice.

I really wish that more than a mere handful of us were participating in this thread. Love you all, don't get me wrong.

Step right up people and please make a valuable contribution. Thank you so much!

Does anyone watch X-Files? If so did you catch the name of the main "nemesis"'s? Thadious Q They!

Dr Q They changed memories.....they actually show him in a MAGA hat!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ETA:

originally posted by: MountainLaurel

LOL, ok, I got it now

Thanks for the Help Faux !

Oh my! We've unleashed a meme monster here






Has anyone been able to find more on Obama retaining council? Other than the Q post, it's been quite on that front.

originally posted by: Martin75
Does anyone watch X-Files? If so did you catch the name of the main "nemesis"'s name? Thadious Q They!

Dr Q They changed memories.....they actually show him in a MAGA hat!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ETA:

Well, we have PerfectEnemy on board to help us out ! Unless he's Q !!! just teasing PE, just more synchronicity in this Beautiful thread....