It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: face23785
Without taking any sides, how the #?
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: Chickensalad
So everyone on the civilian side of this whole debacle has been exonerated? From Bundy to the Oregon standoff? Am I understanding correctly?
Pretty much -- but not exactly.
A few of the defendants in both the Oregon Standoff and the Nevada Standoff plea bargained. Based on this court ruling, they can challenge that plea agreement in court.
I do believe there were a couple of Oregon defendants who were tried separately from the Bundys, and there were a couple of convictions (but I don't remember the charges). If so, they can also challenge those convictions in court.
In the first Nevada trial, two of the defendants were found guilty -- they can now challenge those convictions in court.
All of the defendants, including all the Bundys, who were not convicted in the first Nevada trial and carried over to face a new trial are those who are now Scot free -- all charges dropped and the state cannot re-file or re-try those charges.
originally posted by: Boadicea
originally posted by: face23785
Without taking any sides, how the #?
Mistrial declared due to prosecutorial misconduct... prosecutorial misconduct included several discovery violations -- aka Brady violations -- i.e., prosecutors did not turn over evidence favorable to the defense as required by law.
And the judge found the FBI agents to be complicit.
Since the mistrial hearing, the defense filed a motion to have all charges dismissed with prejudice... and the prosecution filed a motion minimizing their misconduct and requesting a third trial. Today the judge granted the defenses motion to dismiss... and condemned the misconduct of the prosecution and FBI.
Of note, between the mistrial hearing and today's ruling, AG Sessions appointed a new U.S. Attorney to replace the one prosecuting this case -- Steven Myrhe. Sessions also called for a review of the case.
Does that help?
ETA: Here's a thread I authored previously with more details about the prosecutorial misconduct if your interested:
Unsealed motions in NV Bundy case detail prosecution's violations
Alrighty, thanks for the clarification.
Sounds like some damn good news to me.
That was my guess anyway. Overzealous prosecutors are always #ing up cases like this.
originally posted by: Chickensalad
Has Harry Reid made any statements regarding this?
I'm guessing not, as he tried to distance himself as soon as people noticed his connection.
originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: Outlier13
I think they killed several of their cattle in the process. As usual no one will lose their jobs, they should.
"I'm not done fighting by any means"
Today Cliven Bundy will be outside the office of Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo challenging him and other officials to back his stance that led to the Bunkerville Standoff of April 2014.
Bundy says that state and local officials should back his right to graze cattle, use water and pay fees to Clark County instead of the federal government.
Cliven Bundy says the governor of Nevada along with Clark County, Nevada officials aided and abetted the federal government's violations of his family's rights.
Bundy is holding a news conference outside the sheriff's office at 1pm Las Vegas time.