It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them..
So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them..
So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
I think you have your answer right here: is he a "black supremacist"? If he is, then ignore him. If not, then see what it is he is actually trying to say before ignoring him.
That is called "communication".
Yes there are steps that we can discuss that lead up to this. And conversations on race do happen and are productive.
But we do not take people who call for the genocide of a race as serious contributors to the discussion. They should rightly be called out.
There are many white people that also feel disenfranchised is some areas. To this day, even bringing up there feelings of being discriminated against is largely met with ridicule and disdain, mostly from the left.
So I am sure you will agree that we should work on all of the people that have a world view from the left that wont take white people serious with their thoughts on race and discrimination and are forcing people to extremism.
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them.. So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
originally posted by: Grambler
But switch the word to whiote people being killed, and the rhetoric is defensible.
I cannot, and will not, agree that a black man making an empassioned plea for equality within his nation is anything remotely similar to Nazi's spouting pure hate based only in hate.
In fact, i'd say that such a comparison is what is actually disgusting.
People don't realize it but Rwanda or Germany could happen again, history does repeat itself.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them..
So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
I think you have your answer right here: is he a "black supremacist"? If he is, then ignore him. If not, then see what it is he is actually trying to say before ignoring him.
That is called "communication".
No, that is called having a double standard and trying to justify that its more acceptable to call for the deaths of all whites than blacks.
originally posted by: TonyS
a reply to: muzzleflash
People don't realize it but Rwanda or Germany could happen again, history does repeat itself.
I have no doubt it will be repeated. Its only a matter of time.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them..
So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
I think you have your answer right here: is he a "black supremacist"? If he is, then ignore him. If not, then see what it is he is actually trying to say before ignoring him.
That is called "communication".
No, that is called having a double standard and trying to justify that its more acceptable to call for the deaths of all whites than blacks.
That is, if you believe that is what the professor is actually doing (vs using shock value to get attention, maybe sell some books...who knows, maybe he's exploiting racial tension for money)
What game am I playing. I will listen to anyone discuss any problems with race they have. I draw the line and calling for deaths based on someones race, whatever that race may be.
For some reason, in this case, people think we shouldnt call this guy out, or that his rhetoric calling for the killing of white people is somehow more acceptable than someone calling for the killing of another race. That is ridiculous
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: Grambler
You called white supremacists bad people, all of them..
So why should we not say the same about someone calling for the deaths of all whites?
I think you have your answer right here: is he a "black supremacist"? If he is, then ignore him. If not, then see what it is he is actually trying to say before ignoring him.
That is called "communication".
No, that is called having a double standard and trying to justify that its more acceptable to call for the deaths of all whites than blacks.
That is, if you believe that is what the professor is actually doing (vs using shock value to get attention, maybe sell some books...who knows, maybe he's exploiting racial tension for money)
I think you are a great member, I like many of your post.
I guess we will just agree to disagree.
I would just ask you to really reflect on why you think the rhetoric behind calling for the genocide of one race is more defensible than calling for the genocide of another.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
Yall are defending genocide of millions of people and claiming "it's just passionate exaggeration" and that "this genocide isn't comparable to Nazis"...
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
They then proceed to tell everyone "see, I told you the dog was a viscous animal", not realizing that it was their fault the dog lashed-out.
It's an epic dick move and that is what I am seeing in these sorts of cases.
originally posted by: muzzleflash
I can't believe yall actually want me dead because of my skin color.
I never did anything to any of you.
Why don't you learn how to handle life's problems intelligently instead of getting mad and thinking everyone should die?