FBI agent suspected of sending anti-Trump texts removed from Mueller team

originally posted by: whywhynot
This should launch an investigation into the partisan bias of the entire Special Council group. A lot of evidence has already come out showing that the group is biased lib. Now this!

We need a special council to investigate Mueller’s group. I’m not kidding.

Sean has been doing a decent job of it.







And The Still Report.

a reply to: burgerbuddy


Your final video says that, "The investigators should be investigating themselves." I don't think that would work any better than Congress investigating Congressmen who assault women.

a reply to: pavil

What about it? What do you think these interviews should entail. A single light bulb close over a suspects head. Thumb screws, deprivation of food and water? So what if a Clinton supporter attended the interview? Was he the only one? Were questions that needed asking avoided? Would other agents who might have been in attendance not have objected? This really is nothing. Everybody has an opinion. They don't matter as long as you can still do your job. Most people are capable of keeping personal and professional separate. Again making a mountain out of a mole hill to try and discredit the special counsel and the work Mueller is doing.
A long twisted round about way that is stupid and in the end won't matter.

a reply to: whywhynot

No it shouldnt. That's ridiculous.
These people are professionals who do a job without personal feelings being involved.
Or do you imagine... they will fabricate evidence?
Explain to me what anyone's opinion of trump or political affiliations has to do with their ability to do the professional jobs they've been doing all along, some for decades?
How are they suddenly corrupted in your mind when they have been so well respected in their fields?
Or is it just trump who has polluted the playing field? With his name calling and lies that everybody is now so well aware of? His scheming and deception and corruption so prevalent that he believes everyone is as filthy as he is.
And he's spread that ugliness. He continues to try and spread it still.
It's not going to work.
The counsel is healthy and capable and will continue its work unimpeded.
This nonsense will pass with no effect.



.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

Sean has been doing a decent job of it.

Sean's specialty is making imaginary mountains out of molehills.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

What about it? What do you think these interviews should entail. A single light bulb close over a suspects head. Thumb screws, deprivation of food and water? So what if a Clinton supporter attended the interview? Was he the only one? Were questions that needed asking avoided? Would other agents who might have been in attendance not have objected? This really is nothing. Everybody has an opinion. They don't matter as long as you can still do your job. Most people are capable of keeping personal and professional separate. Again making a mountain out of a mole hill to try and discredit the special counsel and the work Mueller is doing.
A long twisted round about way that is stupid and in the end won't matter.

Really?

Good morning, I’m still reporting on: Sen Grassley - Comey Colluded With Clinton, 1683

Synopsis: Senator Chuck Grassley took to the Senate floor on Thursday and delivered a blistering indictment of already disgraced former FBI Director Jim Comey, for colluding with Hillary Clinton help her in her election battle with Donald Trump. Grassley also proved that both House Democrat leader Nancy Polosi and Senate Democrat leader Chuck Shumer continued to pretend that President Trump was under criminal investigation by the FBI, when, in fact, Director Comey had already told them in no uncertain terms that he was not. This allowed months of fake news stories about collusion between Trump and the Russians to proliferate in the MSM in a failed attempt to try to build sufficient momentum for his impeachment. Grassley’s comments show how Comey, the Democrats and the MSM colluded in this shameful scheme that continues to this day and should serve as a warning to every voter to beware of future anti-Trump fake news stories.

a reply to: burgerbuddy

What's your source for that bullcrap?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

What's your source for that bullcrap?

Grassley himself.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: burgerbuddy

What's your source for that bullcrap?

I am not sure how many times we have to say this but you need to expand your media sources to more than just CNN or MSNBC since they are not going to report on any of this.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

No it shouldnt. That's ridiculous.
These people are professionals who do a job without personal feelings being involved.
Or do you imagine... they will fabricate evidence?
Explain to me what anyone's opinion of trump or political affiliations has to do with their ability to do the professional jobs they've been doing all along, some for decades?
How are they suddenly corrupted in your mind when they have been so well respected in their fields?
Or is it just trump who has polluted the playing field? With his name calling and lies that everybody is now so well aware of? His scheming and deception and corruption so prevalent that he believes everyone is as filthy as he is.
And he's spread that ugliness. He continues to try and spread it still.
It's not going to work.
The counsel is healthy and capable and will continue its work unimpeded.
This nonsense will pass with no effect.



.

You are just so partisan that you cannot or will not see it. If Hillary were investigated by a bunch of Republican donors and investigators who were openly personally partisan against her you would be screaming from the rooftops about how unfair this was to her. No reassurance that they are professionals would help. Don’t bother denying it, you know it is true.

You are going to scream though, I predict this will end or pass as you say. The way it will happen you will feel betrayed. The different sides will make a back room deal to let it all drop. The SC has a couple of scalps now (not related to Trump), evidence is building again on major wrong doing by the Clintons and senior former and present Democrat administration officials. Over a years investigation and no collusion.

Each side is going to recognize that if this keeps going both sides are going down, which benefits none of them. Yup, backroom deal and it all slips quietly into the night.

Sorry.

I just saw this article from The Hill up on Sean hannity's twitter feed:

While he was Maryland’s chief federal prosecutor, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s office failed to interview the undercover informant in the FBI’s Russian nuclear bribery case before it filed criminal charges in the case in 2014, officials told The Hill.

And the prosecutors did not let a grand jury hear from the paid informant before it handed up an indictment portraying him as a “victim” of the Russian corruption scheme, or fully review his extensive trove of documents until months later, the officials confirmed.

The decisions backfired after prosecutors conducted more extensive debriefings of William Campbell in 2015, learning much more about the extent of his undercover activities and the transactions he engaged in while under the FBI’s direction, the officials said. The debriefings forced prosecutors to recast their entire criminal case against former Russian uranium industry executive Vadim Mikerinn— removing the informant as a star witness and main victim for the prosecution, the officials added.

The Hill.com

How much more do people have to see before they figure out that this is was beyond inept and incompetent.... for what it is.... people on the inside actively working to cover up wrongdoing by their side?

a reply to: butcherguy

I would like to know if the prosecutors and Defense lawyers in those cases knew about the FBI informant and the info he turned over, especially if it would exonerate their clients. If the prosecutor failed to disclose that info to the defense it is a Brady violation.

Ruh Roah...

James Brower
🍦
🍦‏ @jbro_1776
4h4 hours ago

Scoop: Four other members of the Special Counsel shared similar texts/emails of Anti-Trump sentiments with others within and outside of the Probe. These are high ranking lawyers that are involved in the Probe.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: pavil

What about it? What do you think these interviews should entail. A single light bulb close over a suspects head. Thumb screws, deprivation of food and water? So what if a Clinton supporter attended the interview? Was he the only one? Were questions that needed asking avoided? Would other agents who might have been in attendance not have objected? This really is nothing. Everybody has an opinion. They don't matter as long as you can still do your job. Most people are capable of keeping personal and professional separate. Again making a mountain out of a mole hill to try and discredit the special counsel and the work Mueller is doing.
A long twisted round about way that is stupid and in the end won't matter.

So are you ok with Trump and his associates being interviewed the same way? I would assume you would be... Being you're for real justice and all.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
Ruh Roah...

James Brower
🍦
🍦‏ @jbro_1776
4h4 hours ago

Scoop: Four other members of the Special Counsel shared similar texts/emails of Anti-Trump sentiments with others within and outside of the Probe. These are high ranking lawyers that are involved in the Probe.

This is great news!! A public defender would be able to show the investigators bias and have just about all the "evidence" gathered by these investigators thrown out. Boarder line Fruit from the Poisonous Tree.

a reply to: whywhynot

Of course he had to... for optics.
Wanna bet this doesn't lead to anything?
Wanna bet that this investigation continues right to trumps door?

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

Of course he had to... for optics.
Wanna bet this doesn't lead to anything?
Wanna bet that this investigation continues right to trumps door?

Actually it comes close to prosecutorial misconduct. It also makes one wonder why the DOJ / FBI refused to turn over paperwork to government oversight as required. Was Mueller / his team trying to hide the fact he employed people who have a known bias against Trump? The fact 4 more people were identified tells me someone in the SC office might be trying to do damage control to prevent the SC from imploding.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: whywhynot

Of course he had to... for optics.
Wanna bet this doesn't lead to anything?
Wanna bet that this investigation continues right to trumps door?

Yes let us bet. We are both on the record. The bet is that I believe the SC will go away without Trump being implemented for collusion, you believe that the SC will find and provide conclusive evidence of Trump collusion with Russia.

Right?

The bet? Bragging rights.

Jeezus!
Strzok was also the guy who interviewed Flynn.

FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel’s Office had interviewed Michael Flynn

saraacarter.com...

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Jeezus!
Strzok was also the guy who interviewed Flynn.

FBI supervisor removed from Special Counsel’s Office had interviewed Michael Flynn

saraacarter.com...

Too bad Flynn already pleaded guilty to lying or else he could have had all his testimony all but tossed out. Or at least inject doubt in the investigation/investigators in general which is all a defense needs.


They won’t catch most fish so easy...should have envojed the fifth like the Clinton’s.