It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: carewemust
ISIS I killing in the name of their beliefs
originally posted by: Miracula2
originally posted by: Gargoyle91
a reply to: carewemust
ISIS I killing in the name of their beliefs
Abu Bakr has not received any kind of Divine Sanction for his war. Samson killed a thousand men with the jawbone of an ass in the Old Testament. An army that carried the Ark of the Covenant could not be defeated in the Old Testament.
Abu-Bakr and ISIS's failed assault proves their lack of Divine Sanction. An army supported by God CANNOT be defeated.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Raggedyman
It doesn't matter who the message was directed to. The context is sacrifices and it calls for the first born to be given unto god.
You asked where god made people sacrifice children. I pointed out that verse as a good contender. Pretty simple.
But why not, just take a few words out of context
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Raggedyman
I've seen those but most say he is against people sacrificing them to other gods. Seem perfectly possible that it was part of the religion at one point and then it was taken out.
Also read the redeeming thing, what happens if you don't have five skekles?
Seems like someone in the early church found a way to change the sacrificed firstborns into money for the church since burnt firstborns don't fill the church's coffers.
But why not, just take a few words out of context
Context is formed by the words around the phrase in question not in other chapters or books. The context is clearly about sacrifices. They didn't even bother to make it separate sentences.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Raggedyman
Stop being a drama queen.
I'm pretty sure I have told you before that I was a devout christian at one point in my life.
I was probably a lot like you, thinking that those who question the bible just could not see. Making excuses for the flaws in the texts but those days are now passed. It's all just Jewish mythology to me now.
By the way, did you see where I said that it was "possible" that it was part of the religion at some point? That word is there for a reason.
You know what would have been a better excuse on your part, maybe you can use it from this point on, is that it is a mistake in translation and that since they are talking about sacrifices and they mention grains and wine that they are actually talking about firstborn male livestock.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Raggedyman
Yes, anything is possible.
You asked a question I pointed to an iffy verse and you turned it into all this.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Miracula2
That post didn't say that they killed with devine sanction it said they did it in the name of their beliefs.
originally posted by: carewemust
May 22, 2017
Assuming that GOD (the Creator of all Things) is OMNIPOTENT, doesn't it follow that EVERYTHING that occurs within the Universe is condoned and enabled by GOD?
originally posted by: carewemust
Take mankind for example. We display great LOVE and also great HATRED towards each other. Most religions teach that LOVE is of GOD, and HATE is of Satan. (Mother Theresa did GOD's work / Adolph Hitler did Satan's work)
Since God enables and allows Satan to do his evil work, isn't God just as responsible as Satan? After all, God created Satan and could destroy Satan in the blink of an eye, if he wanted to, if he is indeed omnipotent/all-powerful.
originally posted by: carewemust
For what reason does God allow his "children" to murder each other, be it one-on-one, or one killing thousands? The only "humane" explanation I can come up with, is that if millions of people weren't killed off, the planet wouldn't be able to handle the population growth. After all, how many people would be on the Earth now, if past mass-exterminations, and one-on-one murders never happened?
originally posted by: carewemust
The alternative would be that God is a horrible "parent", who just doesn't care what happens. One that even allows us to go to hell after physical death.
originally posted by: carewemust
I refuse to believe that our Creator would be that callous to his own children. I certainly couldn't/wouldn't condemn either of my two children to eternal torture, no matter WHAT they did. Could YOU?
originally posted by: carewemust
No..all the things we feel are acts of horrendous evil, are indeed evil, but they are allowed because of God's LOVE of mankind, his children, as a whole. We just don't see the REAL REASONS that HE enables and allows them. Does that make sense to anyone else, besides yours truly?
-CareWeMust
Assuming that GOD (the Creator of all Things) is OMNIPOTENT, doesn't it follow that EVERYTHING that occurs within the Universe is condoned and enabled by GOD?