James Comey Rejects Invitation to Testify before Senate Intel

Former FBI director James Comey has rejected an invitation to testify
before the Senate Intelligencee Commitee, the hearing was scheduled
for next week.

Comey, who was fired on Tuesday by President Trump, was invited for a closed session before the panel by Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va.

Warner said on MSNBC Friday afternoon that Comey would not appear before the committee on Tuesday. The office of Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C., confirmed to the Washington Examiner that Comey would not meet with the committee behind closed doors next week.

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

Why would he not just go in and voluntarily testify?

Was he allowed to clean out his desk?
Maybe not! His office where he kept The Clinton files, and
where he kept the files on 9/11?

Does it appear that the FBI was acting with political motivations?

Is this a stall tactic, or will he have to be subpoenaed?

This does not look good on his part...

a reply to: burntheships

Called it. Hmm i completely forgot about the 9/11 angle. F#ck does he know something that could damage the US as a whole and not just Trump.

Pol is digging through a ominous zip file that got posted. Apparently it has personal information from Comey on it. I now know his personal cell number. I'm not downloading it though it feels and smells like a honeypot. I keep you posted if the story develops.

Edit. Clappers personal cell and home address just got posted too.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

I just read that according to the latest, he also
worked inside the bureau with agents to keep Hillay
from prosecution.

Comey had his own ideas. Unbeknownst to his Justice Department colleagues, Comey had resolved to proceed alone with the announcement. Since May, he had been holding a parallel series of meetings with top F.B.I. confidants to thrash through his plan. He would publicly announce—and explain—the Clinton decision without Lynch at his side. “We had discussions for months about what this looked like,” Michael Steinbach, who retired as the F.B.I.’s executive assistant director for national security in February, 2017, said. “This, for us, was the best course of action, given the political situation that we were in—for us to do it independently.”

As Comey saw it, according to Steinbach and others familiar with his thinking, the public doubted Lynch’s independence and would be less likely to accept the decision if she were involved in announcing it.

Clinton wasn't interviewed until July 2. That means a couple of months before the subject of the investigation was interviewed, Comey was plotting a course of action to make the decision not to recommend charges against her seem more palatable to the public.

www.dailywire.com...

www.newyorker.com...

-Chris

Perhaps he doesn't want to answer questions about the "no intent" decision.

Did Mrs.Lynch tell him to do it?

Or did Mr.Obama tell him to do it?

Still covering for his old friends?

a reply to: burntheships

He'll get subpoenaed and testify under oath.

So how will the other side spin this? It looks like Comey played both sides for fools.

Hmm the zip file seems to be real. It contains a list of 500 pages of people on the FBI pay roll. Is this the beginning of civil war that is about to break out between all intelligence agencies. I predicted this too btw.

Hmm i hope someone clicks on Clinton Foundation Total Treason file very soon. I don't say this is all legit btw. I just report on Pols findings.

a reply to: burntheships

Speculation is all well and good ... but we'd don't know anything. All your quote said was that he was not going to meet with the intelligence committee 'next week' and you all seem to think he's refusing to 'talk' for nefarious reasons.

The Washington Examiner is a free tabloid owned by right wing interests.

www.sourcewatch.org...

General warning please don't download the zip file. This looks shady as hell.

a reply to: FyreByrd

So when other news agencies pick it up will
you come back and say anything?

ETA Wa Po is reporting on it now, and The Independant.
Add CNN now so it must be valid, haha.

www.cnn.com...

Okay it's getting weirder by the minute. The following text is not mine.

THE PUNISHMENT OF FBI DIRECTOR JAMES COMEY

“I have seen what you have done in secret, disobeying the law, re-writing the law for your own benefit, for which I AM greatly displeased, Mr. Comey. For that you will receive judgment, O evil worker of iniquity. I have seen what you have done with Hillary Clinton’s case, and have let that evil traitor go with no punishment, taking bribes behind the scenes. For that I AM full of wrath against you. Remember it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the Living God, and I will punish you, O evil worker of iniquity, head of the FBI. You have done your country a great disservice by refusing to put that traitor in prison, and for that you will be punished eternally by My hand. Expect your death in short time, O evil man of iniquity, for I will make your grave, for you are vile. You have done your country a great disservice by letting the traitor go free, and it will be overrun by the Russians, who I will use to destroy it. For I AM a God of vengeance and wrath. Repent James Comey. The Living God has spoken. Amen.”

IT IS NOT GOOD TO ACCEPT THE PERSON OF THE WICKED, TO OVERTHROW THE RIGHTEOUS IN JUDGMENT. PROVERBS 18:5 KING JAMES VERSION (KJV)
THE KING BY JUDGMENT ESTABLISHETH THE LAND: BUT HE THAT RECEIVETH GIFTS OVERTHROWETH IT. PROVERBS 29:4 KJV
And thou shalt take no gift: for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the words of the righteous. Exodus 23:8 KJV
Then these men assembled unto the king, and said unto the king, Know, O king, that the law of the Medes and Persians is, That no decree nor statute which the king establisheth may be changed. Daniel 6:15 KJV
Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding: He revealeth the deep and secret things:

The f#ck is going on.

a reply to: Perfectenemy

You might want to start a thread on it, looks iffy.


Ya'll be careful out there, make sure your
Updated to avoid ransonware !

a reply to: Perfectenemy

What's that?

From Jack Posobeic-

FBI source tells me Comey dropped the Susan Rice unmasking investigation bc it would have implicated himself. Developing

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: Perfectenemy

What's that?

It's from the ominous zip file that got posted on /pol/ a few minutes ago.

originally posted by: draoicht
Perhaps he doesn't want to answer questions about the "no intent" decision.

Did Mrs.Lynch tell him to do it?

Or did Mr.Obama tell him to do it?

Still covering for his old friends?

Interesting, he claimed Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton
appeared improper. I get the feeling he may have been
indeed have been in touch with Obama.

He did visit the Oval Office during that time...

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: draoicht
Perhaps he doesn't want to answer questions about the "no intent" decision.

Did Mrs.Lynch tell him to do it?

Or did Mr.Obama tell him to do it?

Still covering for his old friends?

Interesting, he claimed Lynch meeting with Bill Clinton
appeared improper. I get the feeling he may have been
indeed have been in touch with Obama.

He did visit the Oval Office during that time...

Comey stumbled over the illegal surveillance program and Lynch shut him down. Trump did it again.

youtu.be...

a reply to: burntheships

I think that his "friends" put him in an impossible position.

He did as he was told to do.

Will he now tell who told him?

I suspect he will if he has to.

"I can't recall." does not seem his style...