It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
They are just dropping prescribing over the counter drugs unless that person cannot afford them.
For example certain pain killers cost less than one pound. But when prescribed they cost the nhs 9 pounds or whatever the prescription charge is now.
Makes complete sense.
No, they are doing a lot more than that. You are LYING and misrepresenting what the newspaper article says and what the government says. Go and read the opening post and deal with this intellectually instead of blindly.
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Revolution9
And you don't think with the now ready availability of gluten free food at costs less than a prescription that the tax payer shouldn't be funding the provision of it on the NHS? What about sun tan cream?
Or is this just a thread to say how much you hate foreigners, especially if they are 'non-white'?
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: Nexttimemaybe
They are just dropping prescribing over the counter drugs unless that person cannot afford them.
For example certain pain killers cost less than one pound. But when prescribed they cost the nhs 9 pounds or whatever the prescription charge is now.
Makes complete sense.
No, they are doing a lot more than that. You are LYING and misrepresenting what the newspaper article says and what the government says. Go and read the opening post and deal with this intellectually instead of blindly.
I watched a debate about it this morning. I'm fully educated in the matter thanks.
Continue with your ridiculous ranting.
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Revolution9
It's just a rant with you isn't it? If you don't hate foreigners than why on Earth use a Telegraph article that is not only wrong (the proposed removal of some items from being available via prescription is currently just that - a proposal) and outright suggesting that the issue is 'non white' foreigners?
Go on, enlighten me, or are you just going to keep up with your me me me rant?
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: uncommitted
a reply to: Revolution9
It's just a rant with you isn't it? If you don't hate foreigners than why on Earth use a Telegraph article that is not only wrong (the proposed removal of some items from being available via prescription is currently just that - a proposal) and outright suggesting that the issue is 'non white' foreigners?
Go on, enlighten me, or are you just going to keep up with your me me me rant?
The Telegraph is my morning paper right now.
I am expressing my concerns about my access to health care because it is being rationed. The government have officially stated why that is so. I believe they are telling me the truth.
That is all.
I don't want to communicate with you any longer. I have made my point and the thread has served its purpose as far as I am concerned.
I'm flushing it down the loo now as I move on to other things. Hey, down there...it's coming your way.
Ciao. I'll see you on the other side of hell on earth!
originally posted by: Revolution9
originally posted by: ScepticScot
The UK has never been in the schengen area. How does anyone pursuit of it affect you?
Are you joking?
Don't even think about sliding out of my fury that way.
The EU sets quotas and decides what immigrants go where. Brussels decides how many the Uk should take and the UK takes them or finds its ass in the courts and fined for it.
www.telegraph.co.uk...
Britain will be 'forced' by Brussels to accept Mediterranean migrants The plan, driven by Jean-Claude Juncker, head of the European Commission, is “practically seen as a declaration of war”, senior EU official says
This is largely the reason why we pulled out of the EU. You can't fool the people that LESS resources can provide for MORE people.
In the UK we were put under the burden of austerity and in the next breath dictated to that we must accept millions more refugees, however many Brussels decides we should take, to our utter detriment socially, opportunity and resources wise. That is what the newspapers told us and so we voted on that information and made our decision.
Even a number idiot like me can do that sum, Boss!
It is like saying here is a fish. It is is a smaller fish than we ate yesterday and there are more people who will be eating the fish, but you will actually be eating as much if not more.
Eat your fishy heart out, George Orwell. Doublespeaking forked tongued serpents jump for joy like jack in the box!
You pay taxes all your working life only to be told there is no money to look after everyone!!!!!
Since then, however, the gap has started to widen (particularly against countries that weathered the global financial crisis better than the UK) and looks set to grow further. UK GDP is forecast to grow in real terms by around 15.2 per cent between 2014/15 and 2020/21. But on current plans[2], UK public spending on the NHS will grow by much less: 5.2 per cent. This is equivalent to around £7 billion in real terms – increasing from £135 billion in 2014/15 to £142 billion in 2020/21. As a proportion of GDP it will fall to 6.6 per cent compared to 7.3 per cent in 2014/15. But, if spending kept pace with growth in the economy, by 2020/21 the UK NHS would be spending around £158 billion at today's prices – £16 billion more than planned.
The growing gap between us and our European neighbours should give pause for thought. Tony Blair’s commitment was partly an appeal to ‘keeping up with the Schmidts and Lefebvres’. But it also emphasised that spending more on health care was affordable: if the Danes, Swedes, French and Germans can spend more on health care without apparently bankrupting the rest of their economy, why can’t we?
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Revolution9
So that big BREXIT win didn't improve the finances of Britain and its citizens? I thought that enhanced prosperity was one of the benefits of breaking away from the European Union.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: uncommitted
We need to stop referring to Blairs New Labour, and the Labour Party, as being the same thing.
They are not. One is Red Tories, the other is genuine Labour.
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: uncommitted
And clearly, if he had been doing his job right, nurses and doctors and so on, would have had no reason to strike, because money from less socially relevant sectors of governance should have been reallocated. His failures are not in question here, having as they do, nothing to do with this period in history.
Put simply, there is a massive difference between a Tory government screwing the civil service and the medical profession, which they have ALWAYS done, and a Labour government just simply dropping the ball on a trade union matter occasionally, and in a manner out of character with their normal behaviour. A massive difference.