It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Plotus
Sounds a bit like Revelations and Antichrist
So ATS what do think? Is it better to have a tuff rhetoric leader who sends many to fight for them or have someone lead who may have better political understanding of the worlds affairs and so can organize a global efforts to solve global issues affecting many...
@It's better to have someone lead who can both "project" power, without needing to "use" or "engage" that power in the projection thereof. (Teddy Roosevelt-walk softly and carry a big stick). And hopefully that leader would be one who has superior knowledge of world affairs and who can organize global efforts by way of multi-national coalitions to solve global issues.
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
First off 1 thinks a global effort is the best answer, under UN directions and guidance not responsibility of one nation...
Question-
If a leader is chosen by some people that is prepared to instigate aggression abroad, is it ok or a Karma related for the people who chose to then send their offspring and or family members to initiate said instigations? For who has to go FIGHT? THE VOTERS OFFSPRING OR FAMILY Usually...
Basically sending many to fight AGAIN?
If the UN is in charge of said activities and occupations then maybe there exist a chance to solve the problems...
But if the SAME nation goes back or takes primary aggressive lead AGAIN, BASICALLY ON THEIR OWN, DOESN'T THAT SET SAID NATION BACK AGAIN? Not ahead? And build more hate for future generations?
Due to funding required to fight/support said activities and potential Sacrifices of Soldiers and innocent. Therefore Generating MORE HATE?
Also its not wise to talk the talk without even seeing the distance of the walk ahead.
So ATS what do think? Is it better to have a tuff rhetoric leader who sends many to fight for them or have someone lead who may have better political understanding of the worlds affairs and so can organize a global efforts to solve global issues affecting many...
I'm asking to help resonate - send program into minds to think, because it seems those instigated may get desperate and so respond desperately In ways the many who are about to choose may not fathom... (grm or nuq) then what?
Settings us all back, sort of like wmd wmd wmd sent many abroad who DIDN'T MAKE IT BACK nor fixed but seemed to of caused more harm & hate.
Doesn't look better from this perspective maybe gets worst like ENRON days?
Wishes humanity good luck in decisions made in future.
Intelligent input welcome to help programming... Please avoid emotional responses.
NAMASTE*******
LOVE LIGHT ETERNIA
originally posted by: DAVID64
Then by extension, anyone who lives in any country who participates in war and takes advantage of the freedoms those countries provide, are a hypocrite and is going to burn in Hell, no matter the height of the horse they're riding. If those people have such a problem with it and feel they are fit to judge,, they need to move to a country that has never participated in any war.