It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: visitors
a reply to: PsychicCroMag
Probably not a good idea to get climate scientists mixed up with corrupt pretend scientists that help cover up the truth about 9-11.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: queenofswords
Oh please, I understood it fine. You are making your usual church of climate 'point' and trying to equate the science to religious scripture. I don't think you understand how off base that is and how different those two things are.
I also didn't say that you don't care, just said this "since this can happen we shouldn't worry about anything" is stupid. Yes a super volcano can go off, but that doesn't change anything about the changing of the climate. So save the ad homs and let's talk about that.
originally posted by: visitors
a reply to: stutteringp0et
There are lots of good people using science to prevent the ecosystems being abused. If you don't see the environmental problems for the tragedy they are, then you have no heart - think of all those individual species, defenceless and at the mercy of idiots.
I don't know that someones who pay people to lie about 9-11 would care about flora and fauna at all. Unless you mean they agree with 9-11 because it killed people, and they want to get rid of people generally, because as a species people are killing all the other species?
Just take a science course and ask lots of questions and see just how "FACTUAL" and "NON RELIGIOUS" the response to you will be.
How is it, that you figure that "science" and its control sets, and how it operates in collecting data and ignoring many factors, is not exactly like religion.
originally posted by: stutteringp0et
originally posted by: visitors
a reply to: stutteringp0et
There are lots of good people using science to prevent the ecosystems being abused. If you don't see the environmental problems for the tragedy they are, then you have no heart - think of all those individual species, defenceless and at the mercy of idiots.
I don't know that someones who pay people to lie about 9-11 would care about flora and fauna at all. Unless you mean they agree with 9-11 because it killed people, and they want to get rid of people generally, because as a species people are killing all the other species?
I'm saying that government funded scientists say whatever they're paid to say.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Ksihkehe
Sorry I didn't see your post as I wasn't looking at this thread every minute. You are correct the 97% is not all scientist, I already posted where it is from in this thread so you can find it. I even said that in the post you responded to, not sure why you are asking me a question I answered already multiple times.
And if you are the scientist than you know the burden of proof is on you. I am asking to show the debunked models, so show me.