It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In 2013, Positron Dynamics had seed funding from Paypal billionaire Peter Thiel’s Breakout Labs. Initial simulations show that as much as 10 micrograms of positrons could be produced each week with a linear accelerator," says co-founder Ryan Weed, PhD, a physicist and former cryogenic engineer for Jeff Bezos’s space flight company Blue Origin.
Now they have stated in a new presentation that they will have an antimatter powered cubesat vehicles in 2016-2019. They will be able to keep a cubesat in low earth orbit for seven years instead of few days. Then they will enable high speed spacecraft to go the outer solar system and then to the stars at a significant fraction of the speed of light.
yoda would have a hard time fitting into a cube sat so it would have to be a pixie or something.
originally posted by: madmac5150
So who will be piloting this thing?
Han or Chewie?
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
yoda would have a hard time fitting into a cube sat so it would have to be a pixie or something.
originally posted by: madmac5150
So who will be piloting this thing?
Han or Chewie?
originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: stormbringer1701
They are saying that their process could (possibly) make 10 micro-grams of antimatter in a week.
To put this into perspective, one micro-gram equals one millionth of a gram. One million grams is one metric tonne.
According to their graph, to move a 1 metric tonne payload, over interstellar distances, at less than half the speed of light, would require about 1 metric tonne of antimatter.
To make that much antimatter with their "antimatter factory" would take a mere 192 billion years.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: stormbringer1701
I would go nowhere near a craft with antimatter in it. Even it they succeeded in producing enough antimatter to actually push the craft.
One leak in the Penning trap and boom, you become an example of Shakespeare's "not to be".
Security issues aside, antimatter is the costliest material in the world - it costs $25 billion per gram to produce if you are talking about positrons. As for hydrogen antiatoms, they cost a whopping $62.5 trillions per gram to produce.
The whole idea is just ridiculous.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Then it's not an antimatter drive, it's a nuclear drive. Just like the Galileo, the New Horizons, etc.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
neither of those are nuclear.
RTGs do not count as a drive.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Yes, but the we already power crafts with plutonium. Nuclear reaction without the need for antimatter.
Why not trigger the nuclear reactor with neutrons? Just like in regular nuclear power plants? You would eliminate the need (and security risks) of a Penning trap.
originally posted by: swanne
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
neither of those are nuclear.
Nuclear properties of Plutonium
RTGs do not count as a drive.
But then, neither does the project in the OP if it intends on using "fission or fusion" to produce electricity. Correct me if I am wrong but it seems to me the project is intending on building a craft with its own nuclear power plant.
originally posted by: MrCrow
But does antimatter actually exist? A quick peruse over the web posits theories but no one has actually "found it". In any case, it's a fantastic topic. S%F.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
nuclear reactors is not directly creating propulsion from a nuclear reaction.
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
no one has deliberately designed a purpose built device to do it nor an effective means to contain large amounts of them for long periods of time.
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: stormbringer1701
Security issues aside, antimatter is the costliest material in the world - it costs $25 billion per gram to produce if you are talking about positrons. As for hydrogen antiatoms, they cost a whopping $62.5 trillions per gram to produce.
The whole idea is just ridiculous.