It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: andy1972
a reply to: ipsedixit
Theres her blood splattered on the wall And under the floor tiles.
They can't answer how it got there..
No a smear, but splattered, in 5 points.points on the wall.
Why are their statements so full of inconsistencies from day one?
"someone jemmied the window", for example.
Their stories have been invented to coincide with evidence presented, and not very well.
The Portuguese police stopped looking for suspects from day 2.
Why, because they had them already, the parents.
Why refuse to answer 47 of 48 questions that could help find your daughter alive and well, that is of course because you already know she cant be found, alive anyway.
Why are there so many lies and inconsistencies?
Did they drug he?
Three year-old feared abducted in Portugal
By staff and agencies
12:01AM BST 04 May 2007
. . .
A three-year-old British girl has gone missing while on a family holiday in Portugal, the Foreign Office said today.
Portuguese police are investigating the disappearance from a holiday complex in Praya da Luz in the western Algarve.
A Foreign Office spokesman said that he understood the girl's parents had gone to have dinner once their children were asleep last night, but returned to check on them only to find the girl had gone missing.
"They reported it straight away," he said, adding that consular assistance was being offered.
originally posted by: andy1972
a reply to: ipsedixit
I agree about the press and the Foreign Office help, it was absolutely unprecented.
However, their unwillingness to cooperate with the police, for me, shows a level of complicity with the crime.
The statement from Sylvia Gaspar should have been looked into further aswell.
I always ask why o why are these people so important that the British government spends millions on them delegating them a special home office liasons within hours.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
It probably was. I don't think there is anything to her suspicions. I think Payne was probably miming a question about breast feeding in the incident cited by the Gaspars.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: ipsedixit
This is another scenario that I think could be investigated...as David Payne claims that Gerry asked him to go see if Kate needs help with getting the children ready for bed (????????????), why would the husband ask his friend to do that?
originally posted by: andy1972
Because he needs someone else to see her "alive" at that time.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
originally posted by: andy1972
Because he needs someone else to see her "alive" at that time.
Would the Paynes go along with Kate and Gerry in attempting to conceal the death of their daughter? I have a hard time believing they would..
originally posted by: andy1972
originally posted by: WarminIndy
a reply to: ipsedixit
This is another scenario that I think could be investigated...as David Payne claims that Gerry asked him to go see if Kate needs help with getting the children ready for bed (????????????), why would the husband ask his friend to do that?
Because he needs someone else to see her "alive" at that time.
originally posted by: andy1972
a reply to: ipsedixit
Look, those of us that have children have a certain " radar" for the strange #ers that hang around our kids, and we notice whats normal and not normal.
As a mother, this GP's radar had her "mother radar" switched on and she was alerted by the actions of Payne and McCann, even doubting what she had heard, looking at everyone else in the group to see if anyone else had heard it.
This had nothing to do with breast feeding, it has to do with poeple who drug their kids and leave them to the mercy of paedophiles.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
. . . and betray their secret depravities in casual company by making clumsily "provocative" gestures to others in the group who are in the know.
I'm sorry. I just don't think so.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
originally posted by: andy1972
a reply to: ipsedixit
Look, those of us that have children have a certain " radar" for the strange #ers that hang around our kids, and we notice whats normal and not normal.
Parents are protective and usually suspicious of strangers. I grant that gladly.
As a mother, this GP's radar had her "mother radar" switched on and she was alerted by the actions of Payne and McCann, even doubting what she had heard, looking at everyone else in the group to see if anyone else had heard it.
She was disturbed by it.
This had nothing to do with breast feeding, it has to do with poeple who drug their kids and leave them to the mercy of paedophiles.
. . . and betray their secret depravities in casual company by making clumsily "provocative" gestures to others in the group who are in the know.
I'm sorry. I just don't think so.
The "tapas 7", the friends of the McCanns stuck together, but I think that was related to the possibility that some kind of negligence charge could be brought against them. The Paynes actually had a remote radio baby monitor at their table in the tapas bar, so they would have had the least to fear on the negligence issue and would be the least likely to help the McCanns in a criminal conspiracy, in my opinion.
originally posted by: ipsedixit
a reply to: andy1972
I don't think so in this case, but I agree that some people are like that.
These people are ordinary doctors, who lead ordinary doctor lives. They are well educated and work hard. They are not fabulously wealthy oligarchs of the NWO type, who don't care who knows they are plotting an invasion.
David Payne is actually a research fellow at a teaching hospital, I believe. He is a very smart doctor. I don't think he is involved in paedophilia and I don't think he would be dumb enough to make needlessly provocative gestures.