It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"There are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source ." - Albert Einstein
originally posted by: FearYourMind
a reply to: JUhrman
We understand 3 of the unknown amount of dimensions around us, yet we act like questioning our creation and surroundings is some sort of blasphemy?
I hate to hurt people's feelings, but you don't understand the least of what you are or where we came from. In 200 years people will be chuckling at our teachings in science and evolution.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
a reply to: Answer
You are a prime example of the second quote provided by Einstein.
"There are the fanatical atheists whose intolerance is the same as that of the religious fanatics, and it springs from the same source ." - Albert Einstein
Yes you can study the processes in place, that is obvious. You will never acknowledge the possibility of intelligence placing those processes and the limitations imposed on the processes. Einstein hit the nail on the head and was open to all possibilities, which was why he was able to comprehend things others could not.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: FearYourMind
Also, why haven't any other apes evolved? If we supposedly came from apes then you would expect other apes would have evolved with us, but not one of them has.
All the apes have evolved... Just because we are the only ones to become rational thinkers doesn't mean that the others didn't evolve. There are MANY unique circumstances that built up to support our growing brain development. The other ape species didn't go through those circumstances so they didn't evolve rational thinking. They did evolve OTHER traits that we don't have though.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: FearYourMind
Also, why haven't any other apes evolved? If we supposedly came from apes then you would expect other apes would have evolved with us, but not one of them has.
It has already been pointed out that we shared a common ancestor with apes so you are a bit off base however you seem to be forgetting quite a bit.
Reacquaint yourself with Homo neanderthalensis.
And a little more info for you.
Of course, there is a lot more on the subject just use that computer in front of you. Anyway, now that you see how dumb your argument is hopefully you will refrain from using it again.
There are truth seekers and then there are people who claim to be truth seekers that are simply lieng.
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FearYourMind
Then go create a thread about the BBT, or better yet, post in one of the numerous already existing threads on the topic. If you did that, maybe you would have discovered that the singularity is being discarded.
No Big Bang? Yes, Big Bang
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: JUhrman
a reply to: FearYourMind
The extraordinary thing that happened is we learned to speak articulate languages allowing the transmission of idea over generation.
Without language and education a feral human child is not smarter than a monkey.
Hence why the bible says our story begins with the word.
Monkey see monkey do or copycat behavior does the same thing. Animals have languages, even when they scream out to warn their pack of danger, the little ones learn the behavior through hearing and seeing so can pass it on indefinitely.
Writing is what separates us, whether pictorial or text. We can write down the same experiences and others imaginations can transform the meaning of writings into imaginary experiences as if they were there learning from the experience first hand.
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
What I don't believe is that non-organic matter spontaneously became organic and then spontaneously became a one celled organism, then it in turn over millions of years evolved into both genders in every species until humanity happened.
If that did happen there would be millions of missing link skeletal remains of both species and genders in between.
And what do we have today for the fossil record, not that.
And even the carbon dating is flawed, it's not 100% accurate.
As an example, this guy if you found his skeletal remains from 40 million years ago, it could be thought to be the ancestor to a much bigger dinosaur, in the evolutionary line of development, but he actually isn't, but he stayed the same, 40 million years latter he is still the same.
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: FearYourMind
a reply to: JUhrman
We understand 3 of the unknown amount of dimensions around us, yet we act like questioning our creation and surroundings is some sort of blasphemy?
You're right about that because we're still in the beginning stages of our understanding. It's called "laying the groundwork" for further understanding. Should we give up on science and accept "god did it" as our explanation for everything? How far would that have gotten us as a species if primitive man chose that route?
originally posted by: Thecakeisalie
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
Life...finds a way.
Evolution does not happen overnight which is why there aren't millions of missing link skeletal remains.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FearYourMind
Then go create a thread about the BBT, or better yet, post in one of the numerous already existing threads on the topic. If you did that, maybe you would have discovered that the singularity is being discarded.
No Big Bang? Yes, Big Bang
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
Says who? I happen to understand both and know how one led to the other, but that doesn't mean that I need to know one to understand the other.
originally posted by: Cypress
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
Evolution as a biological process does not require understanding the creation of the universe. The universe exists and life exists.
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FearYourMind
Then go create a thread about the BBT, or better yet, post in one of the numerous already existing threads on the topic. If you did that, maybe you would have discovered that the singularity is being discarded.
No Big Bang? Yes, Big Bang
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
Says who? I happen to understand both and know how one led to the other, but that doesn't mean that I need to know one to understand the other.
You understand neither. Again, that's just ego taking over your mind.
originally posted by: FearYourMind
Technically evolution goes all the way back to the beginning of time and space. So rather than focusing on apes, I focus on what created the universe and existence itself. I am stumped with the Big Bang theory and why it is accepted as fact and nobody considers what created the singularity that became the Big Bang. So, if we can't understand that, then we will never know exactly where we came from or how we were created.
originally posted by: Another_Nut
I HAVE no clue whats going on
not even close
the fact is we have 500+ million years and nothing new
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: FearYourMind
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FearYourMind
Then go create a thread about the BBT, or better yet, post in one of the numerous already existing threads on the topic. If you did that, maybe you would have discovered that the singularity is being discarded.
No Big Bang? Yes, Big Bang
You can't understand evolution without first understanding the creation of the universe.
Says who? I happen to understand both and know how one led to the other, but that doesn't mean that I need to know one to understand the other.
You understand neither. Again, that's just ego taking over your mind.
I don't? Hmmm... All that research for nothing because some guy who has demonstrated a failing of the core principles of how science works said so... Glad you could clear that up.