Bloomberg’s Anti-Gun Group Targets Tighter Laws in 12 States

originally posted by: AgentShillington

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: AgentShillington

Hey guess what ?

All those mass shootings were done by a MINORITY.

Over 330 million other people didn't shoot anyone.

But GD they should be forced to pay for what someone does.

Right?

So much for 'liberty'.

What about the people NOT shot in mass shootings?

1/3 of Americans know someone that has been shot with a firearm.

Source?

Second line.

a reply to: AgentShillington

You said you're not opposed to repealing the 2nd Amendment. So what is it then? Banning them or allowing gun-protected goons who don't interact in the society they govern determine who can lawfully own one?

a reply to: AgentShillington

You're the one spouting off about banning guns. I'm talking about some common sense laws.

Common sense for creating more laws for something that is ALREADY ILLEGAL.

LOL.

That isn't common sense. That is down right idiotic.

Especially when those 'common sense' gun control laws are in total conflict of the Bill of rights.

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
a reply to: AgentShillington

Yeah and it's mostly by criminals and those who didn't possess the firearm legally.

All gun crimes are committed by someone illegally using a firearm, as the moment you are committing a crime, you are illegally in possession of a firearm.

I feel for you. Needing to protect yourself from others with guns is exactly why stricter gun laws should be created. If it is harder to get the gun from manufacturer to point of sale, it will be harder to get from point of sale to committed crime.

It's a win for everyone.

a reply to: AgentShillington

The majority of gun related crimes are committed with guns not registered and already illegal.



Now what?

All these mass shooting over the last decade have taken place in gun free zones, perpetrated by individuals on antidepressants. Maybe those are the subjects that need to be addressed.

a reply to: AgentShillington

That's nonsense.

Total nonsense. So if someone is arrested for shooting a rapist, but are legal gun owners, then the crime automatically voids their permit or license?

That makes no sense.

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: AgentShillington

You're the one spouting off about banning guns. I'm talking about some common sense laws.

Common sense for creating more laws for something that is ALREADY ILLEGAL.

Owning guns isn't illegal. What are you talking about?

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
a reply to: AgentShillington

That's nonsense.

Total nonsense. So if someone is arrested for shooting a rapist, but are legal gun owners, then the crime automatically voids their permit or license?

That makes no sense.

If they are convicted of a crime, yes.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AgentShillington

The majority of gun related crimes are committed with guns not registered and already illegal.

Now what?

That actually helps the case for restricting production of new firearms in the United States.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: AgentShillington

The majority of gun related crimes are committed with guns not registered and already illegal.

Now what?

That actually helps the case for restricting production of new firearms in the United States.

a reply to: AgentShillington

No it doesn't. And I won't sit here and listen to political rhetoric with absolutely no basis in law or reality. Either you truly are ignorant of American laws and common sense or you're just a shill (and a really poor one at that).

originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
All these mass shooting over the last decade have taken place in gun free zones, perpetrated by individuals on antidepressants. Maybe those are the subjects that need to be addressed.

Gun Free Zones and anti-depressants don't kill people.

People with guns kill people.

a reply to: AgentShillington

People kill people with knives, clubs, cars, arrows, spears, rocks, various blunt objects, bare hands.

The item isn't the problem, the mind of the individual using it is.

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
a reply to: AgentShillington

No it doesn't. And I won't sit here and listen to political rhetoric with absolutely no basis in law or reality. Either you truly are ignorant of American laws and common sense or you're just a shill (and a really poor one at that).

Okay, buddy.

You go on believing that you can use your gun to commit crimes and NOT have your permit revoked.

a reply to: AgentShillington

And you can continue to try to derail threads with absolute nonsense if you want to. No one's stopping you from looking like an ignoramus.

originally posted by: Yeahkeepwatchingme
a reply to: AgentShillington

People kill people with knives, clubs, cars, arrows, spears, rocks, various blunt objects, bare hands.

The item isn't the problem, the mind of the individual using it is.

And yet, the amount of people killed with guns far exceeds any of the other methods you have mentioned, save for cars, which we have loads of restrictions on.

a reply to: AgentShillington

And those guns are usually owned illegally.

What exactly is your point besides spouting complete misinformation?

originally posted by: seeker1963
Source?

Second line.

Goss, Kristin, “Disarmed: The Missing Movement for Gun Control,” Princeton University Press, 2006. p. 2

a reply to: AgentShillington

Link please?

2nd line is so fine.