New York Times sparks anger after it publishes Darren Wilson's address

a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

maybe we should keep the illegals and deport the homegrown communist riffraff!!!!!!

Just kidding, but it's an idea.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

maybe we should keep the illegals and deport the homegrown communist riffraff!!!!!!

Just kidding, but it's an idea.

...or...let the populations just switch countries.

originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
a reply to: Patriotsrevenge

maybe we should keep the illegals and deport the homegrown communist riffraff!!!!!!

Just kidding, but it's an idea.

I take offense to that, sir. I am not some hippy communist. Hell, if anything I'm closer to being an anarchist. But I still believe in the constitution. Deport yourself.

Did ANYONE read the article???

They only posted his STREET, which had been posted many other places.

The story mentions only the name of the street where the couple have a house and that street has been widely reported on

Source

Like rats to the cheese, its a trap!!!!

Go ahead and go ahere looking for trouble whitey will be waiting with open arms and a glock.

originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic

Did ANYONE read the article???

They only posted his STREET, which had been posted many other places.

The story mentions only the name of the street where the couple have a house and that street has been widely reported on

Source

Good point, but I'd rather see a sensible approach on reporting on active legal cases until a Grand Jury or trial is over. I'm not a fan of trying a case in the court of public opinion, no matter what side you side with.

Two New York Times Reporters Posted Darren Wilson’s Home Address. Look Here To See THEIR Home Addresses.

Link

Reporter John Hawkins had an equally irresponsible article in response, while complaining about the NYT reporters.

When the article drew scrutiny, the Times removed the image of Wilson and Spradling's marriage license and appended the following editor's note:
An earlier version of this post included a photograph that contained information that should not have been made public. The image has been removed.
That redaction led many readers to mistakenly believe that the Times had published Wilson's current residence address and then withdrawn that information due to public protest, but the address published by the paper in the since-edited article was for a law firm and not for the domicile in which Wilson is currently living.

The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; moreover, that information was neither current nor revelatory in nature since (as noted in the same article) the Wilsons had vacated the house months earlier, and that same information had already been widely disseminated back in August 2014 in coverage of the Mike Brown case published major newspapers such as the Washington Post and the Boston Globe.

Link

a reply to: IAMTAT

Things must be calming down so the NYT is going to create its own "head dead yet " incident to boost sales.

How about it "NEW YORK TIMES" did you collect the reward that was out for the information you posted.

How LOW does a news outlet go to create news.

What do you think of reporter John Hawkins response by publishing the reporters name/address of the original article?

Link