It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Willtell
Alex Jones believes in Nut Neutrality.
This right-wing tea party fake conspiracy theorist is a shill for some right wing think tank Koch type sinister group
Who cares what he thinks.
He spouts typical right-wing, fake freedom (2nd amendment, hate the government across the line dogma of love the rich and hate paying taxes) even though his fat ass lives off the
Largess of this civilizations wealth and infrastructure just like ALL these fake, phoney right-wingers
Reclassifying broadband as a regulated common carrier under Title II of the Communications Act would expose broadband services to a 16 percent telecom service fee that supports the FCC’s Universal Service Fund, said several speakers at net neutrality discussion hosted by antiregulation think tank the Free State Foundation [FSF].
Title II regulation would open broadband up to several new regulations, including USF fees and state and local telecom taxes, speakers at the event said. “Consumers of these services would face an immediate increase in their bills,” said Republican FCC member Michael O’Rielly.
Supporters of broadband reclassification say the FCC could exempt broadband from most telecom-style regulations. Title II is the only way the FCC can ensure “clear, bright-line” rules prohibiting broadband providers from selectively blocking or throttling Web content will be enforceable, countered Michael Weinberg, vice president of digital rights group Public Knowledge.
The FSF’s event, titled “thinking the unthinkable,” came just days after Obama waded deep into the net neutrality debate by endorsing the reclassification of broadband from a lightly regulated information service to a regulated telecom service
That seems to be the president’s concern, too. But why he would fear it is a mystery, given that, as he says in the video:
Ever since the Internet was created, it’s been organized around basic principles of openness, fairness, and freedom. There are no gatekeepers deciding which sites you get to access. There are no toll roads on the information superhighway. This set of principles – the idea of “net neutrality” – has unleashed the power of the Internet and given innovators the chance to thrive.
That is, “net neutrality” de facto already exists, without the aid of any governmental entity to enforce it. Why, then, is government enforcement suddenly necessary to maintain the status quo?
originally posted by: dezertdog
He may not get every little fact straight but that means little to me.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus
And one of three things is going to happen, very soon…
1) "Nothing," because of either delays in doing something, or the rare chance nothing is done.
2) New regulations/laws/legislation, being written by corporate interests, to implement the FCC's Hybrid Approach.
3) Reclassification of the Internet as a Title II utility under existing laws (the entire content-side of the Internet wants this)
originally posted by: ThirdEyeofHorus
originally posted by: Willtell
Alex Jones believes in Nut Neutrality.
This right-wing tea party fake conspiracy theorist is a shill for some right wing think tank Koch type sinister group
Who cares what he thinks.
He spouts typical right-wing, fake freedom (2nd amendment, hate the government across the line dogma of love the rich and hate paying taxes) even though his fat ass lives off the
Largess of this civilizations wealth and infrastructure just like ALL these fake, phoney right-wingers
Yah he makes a living in the dreaded private sector media just like Ed Schulz and Rachel Maddow. I bet Rachel and Ed are both pretty wealthy right now.
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: Indigo5
The bill will be written by the Media Barons via backroom direction and demands.
And THAT will be "Obama Care for the Internet," not the Title II reclassification Alex Jones and Republicans are bleating about.
FCC chair said to balk at Obama's Net neutrality plan
.....
"What you want is what everyone wants: an open Internet that doesn't affect your business," a visibly upset Wheeler told executives, according to sources in attendance. "What I've got to figure out is how to split the baby."
FCC press secretary Kim Hart confirmed to the BBC that the decision on the issue will be put off until the new year.
"There will be no vote on open internet rules in the December meeting agenda. That would mean rules would now be finalised in 2015."
Earlier the FCC had said that it would make a decision by the end of the year.
originally posted by: Indigo5
Split the baby?
"an open Internet that doesn't affect your business"...ISPs business plan involves them charging and profiting for a selectively "open internet" of their choosing.
originally posted by: AvoidBadCompany
a reply to: theNLBS
Are you qualified to throw the first stone at jones? I'd say not. Isn't he also just a man like you and I, not perfect or blameless?