It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tsingtao
originally posted by: Harte
Oh, that is unfortunate.
See, no mainstream scientist has ever believed the world was flat. In fact, the spherical shape of the planet has been known since Ancient Greek times. Yes, even during the "Dark Ages."
So, I'd suggest being a bit more careful in parsing your pro-AA arguments in the future. Your analogies indicate that you lack either the intellect or the education to rationally discuss the subject.
Harte
yeah and everyone today knows what a higgs-boson is.
hell, some don't know who joe biden is. and they can VOTE!
wtf does flat earther ignorant people have to do with science?
lol, what strawmen we build to bash.
i think i'll spark up my private CERN and mess around for a bit, i'll get back to you guys when my peer review comes in.
or do you just want to read my paper first? we can compare notes?
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: Mr Mask
Undirected natural pansperima and directed panspermia are two different concepts. Both can be possible and are not creations of con men.
MM
now here's a good example of what I'm talking about. That doesn't even make sense. The point is incoherent. You are not interested in discussing the idea of life arising from outer space and even being guided intentionally by other species of sentient beings. You 'd rather harp on smearing people as if the gist of what we are talking about will go away. Basically a shrill ad hominem flailing, attention seeking, silly little rant.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
so if the universe is teeming with life that's been around for billions of years then why is it such a stretch to think there are beings that have been around much longer than us?
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
That's the slippery slope with that because once you go there it explains everything very elegantly. Now you guys can curl up in your mechanistic fetal position and scream "YOU HAVE NO PROOF!!!"
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
it's funny you mention direct panspermia being unlikely because the Mask guy says it's possible so I guess you need to explain why you think it is unlikely.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: Mr Mask
Undirected natural pansperima and directed panspermia are two different concepts. Both can be possible and are not creations of con men.
MM
now here's a good example of what I'm talking about. That doesn't even make sense. The point is incoherent. You are not interested in discussing the idea of life arising from outer space and even being guided intentionally by other species of sentient beings. You 'd rather harp on smearing people as if the gist of what we are talking about will go away. Basically a shrill ad hominem flailing, attention seeking, silly little rant.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
it's funny you mention direct panspermia being unlikely because the Mask guy says it's possible so I guess you need to explain why you think it is unlikely.
I tend to think alien interventon is a more accurate description of what is going on in a general way. Still no account for the intentions of "why?", though.
originally posted by: Crystalwolf
I watch ancient aliens, and some of the stuff is far fetched, just don't take everything seriously. They do have some great evidence though. The may hype up the show a bit for the ratings, but there is no need to dog the show. If you don't like the show then don't watch it, no need to ruin it for everyone else. reply to: Mr Mask
originally posted by: QuietSpeech
a reply to: Mr Mask
Thanks for sharing your video, I found it entertaining, and for about 15 seconds I considered firing up the xbox to go shoot people, but after seeing your elite skills I realized that is why I quit playing that game.
As for AA, I could only watch part of a show and had to turn it off because of the constant stream of lies and far fetched ideas. If there is a rational substitute it doesn't make the final cut before the show airs.
originally posted by: Mr Mask
I challenge you to provide one bit of evidence from the show that you find great, so I can destroy it before your very eyes with little effort.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
originally posted by: Mr Mask
I challenge you to provide one bit of evidence from the show that you find great, so I can destroy it before your very eyes with little effort.
www.therendleshamforestincident.com...
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
We have science telling us life is more than likely all over the place and that's where the forensic evidence comes into play. It's the smoking gun here on Earth.
what is your explanation?
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Mr Mask
I'm just trying to figure out why you are so hyper offended by a television show as if it even matters.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
We have science telling us life is more than likely all over the place and that's where the forensic evidence comes into play. It's the smoking gun here on Earth.
what is your explanation?
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
a reply to: Harte
We have science telling us life is more than likely all over the place and that's where the forensic evidence comes into play. It's the smoking gun here on Earth.
what is your explanation?