It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bob88
I think the economy should be left to run its course. I want to know, BT, what you expect Bush or �the government� to do that will improve the economy? You act like there is some magic job creating wand Bush can wave and your mad he hasn�t waved it yet.
It is indeed terrible that people are loosing their jobs and the economy isn't in a better state. You've been around long enough to have seen previous economic downturns to know these things tend to run in cycles. With the terrorist attacks and corp scandals this might be worse than before but I've never thought the government capable of doing that much for the economy. Outside of tax cut - I am skeptical at any government action taken to prompt the economy - it would probably have the opposite of its intended effect.
[Edited on 2-1-2003 by Bob88]
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
A-R, let's not insult one another as you did. Notice the edit? I believe I captured your point but in a less antagonizing way.
Also, "junk" is a better word than the using of the vulgar word for a male bovine's excrement, wouldn't you agree?
It pains me to have to correct a fellow conservative's post, so please work with me!
Bob, why didn't you catch that, huh? I am totally appalled at the lax nature I'm detecting from my two fellow conservatives.
B-T, on behalf of the conservatives, I apologize profusely. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go flog myself to pay the just price for my wayward brethren.
Originally posted by Bout Time
The recession officially started in 3/2001....ample time to do something about it, don't you think?
The key point is that this isn't your father's recession -- it's your grandfather's recession. That is, it isn't your standard postwar recession, engineered by the Federal Reserve to fight inflation, and easily reversed when the Fed loosens the reins.
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
...How dare you edit my post!...
....But never, NEVER, change my words again!
Originally posted by Winston Smith
As this nation geared up it's massive spending engines in speculating on massive digital profits around consumers, the Internet, and Y2K catastrophe prevention; no one wanted to recall the alarming historical parallels.
As the fall began, "The Fed" should have been very hands-off. In late 2000, we still had a very strong consumer economy (the strongest ever), robust technology infrastructure, and still billions of unallocated venture capital. The economy was poised to absorb a 20% sell-off with virtual ease without Fed intervention. However, as happened in the late 1920's, emotion ruled the day. George W. Bush began talking of economic troubles as part of his campaign platform... building negative buzz. The buzz evolved into serious investigation, which sparked emotional sell-offs of equities (always bad), and further emotional response. This combined with the massive inevitable down-sizing of corporate IT budgets as a result of Y2K survival, further exacerbated the situation from bad to catastrophic as the market psychology was ruled by the "day trader". Throw into the mix the thousands of terrible business plans given life on NASDAQ after the minimum requirements for IPO were reduced, and you have a market crash, down-sizing, and lost jobs.
Right now, the Fed should raise rates as the extreme low rates are now harming the economy, since those who make money on the lending of money are making slightly less than a profitable margin, and the standard rates on "savings accounts" pitiful.
So, for those keeping political score, we can watch the wave of history and gather both "sides" has equal complicity in this current economic situation.
Originally posted by Bob88
Bout Time - with all that you've mentioned about Clinton's crotchable area - I am afraid to ask what sort of services you sell.
The first rebate didn't seem to do much. It was said people used it more for personal debt reduction instead of buying stuff. I do agree that the jobless benefits should have been extended.
Originally posted by William
Originally posted by Affirmative Reaction
...How dare you edit my post!...
....But never, NEVER, change my words again!
Moderators are in place to maintain the peace. If Thomas felt the need to modify a post, he has the full support of forum management. Please direct any further issues you may have to me, Bob88, or Simon via U2U.