It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Surely, he thought, there was a medical staff at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. Somebody must have seen the bruises and treated the injuries that the prisoners had suffered. So why didn't they speak up?
Miles argues that health professionals turned a blind eye, or worse, to the torture and deaths of some of their patients. "These health professionals could have protested," he said. Instead, "the medical system here became one of the professional arms of a torturing society."
His allegations -- first published in a medical journal last summer -- have infuriated the Pentagon. "We have no evidence that military medical personnel collaborated with interrogators or guards accused or suspected of detainee abuse, or condoned abusive behavior," said James Turner, a spokesman for the Defense Department in Washington.
More than a year ago, Miles began hunting for information on the Abu Ghraib scandal on the Internet. He found thousands of government documents on the scandal -- many of them from the military's own investigations -- that had been posted on websites by the Department of Defense and watchdog groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union.
His first article, in the British medical journal Lancet in August, created something of an international sensation. He reported that doctors had falsified the death certificates of some of the detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan. He wrote that they had written off suspicious deaths as natural ones -- in one case, attributing a man's death to a heart attack, even though he died in a coma with skull fractures and burns on his feet. Another death certificate said that a prisoner had died of "natural causes" in his sleep -- although the Pentagon later found that he was beaten to death. Beyond that, Miles wrote, evidence showed that doctors had helped design the "psychologically and physically coercive" interrogation techniques that violated the Geneva Conventions.
So the idea of American involvement in torture holds a special horror for Miles, who also teaches medical ethics. "Torture is prohibited for all, but health professionals serve in a special kind of role," he said. They're in a unique position, he insists, to detect evidence of torture and to do something about it!
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Where does it say Guantanmo in that article? I fail to see it mentioned once, stick to the topic don't try to spin off the story. And I do not know where, or how the doctor at Abu Garib operated.
Originally posted by horten229v3
Alright, go ask a bunch of people and see how many times they have lied today- its near 99%,
The Doctor may be doing the right thing- the constitution of the United States that the Government may use any force necessary to protect Americans in grim times.
When terrorist acts or war happens, our rights as Americans, and other peoples rights are taken away by the US, but it is necessary that the Government does that so they may protect its citizens.
Originally posted by dh
With a few exceptions the medical system and its personnel operate at the behest of the drug cartels and the large corporations who provide the bulk of the research funding that informs , or rather disinforms, their practice
It is no use expecting the medical profession and doctors on the whole to protect the victims of the New World Order when their whole enterprise is based on the dispensation of toxic drugs, cutting and slicing people and burning them up in various ways
Those assigned to penal encampments of various kinds, will almost always side with the culture of punishment, torture, whatever
They are position and fear led dogs like everyone else, whatever their hippocratic oaths or whatever
Dr Mengele, I presume?
Originally posted by horten229v3
Alright, go ask a bunch of people and see how many times they have lied today- its near 99%, now go ask people who have done something contrary to an oath they had taken some time in their life, once again the percentage reaches about 99.9999999999%.
Originally posted by horten229v3
Ooo noo those poor poor terrorists having to go through *Gasp* PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE!!!! ahhhh! alright get real- do you see the things they do to US soldiers? alright well we treat them humanely and only exploit phsychological means of extracting information. If we cannot do that, what can we do? give them incentives? BS- "alright terrorist, if you confess we will let you go and then get ur buds", no we EXTRACT the info FROM them, leaving them with no leverage.