posted on Feb, 11 2014 @ 11:09 AM
Yeah im not sure those apples are really what is happening.
The issue is one of frustration because what actually is required is evidence. Technology itself no one in the scientific community really worries to
much about as long as it works. The issue is that when someone comes along (like iv seen on this forum) and makes a statement like
"Oh I have some very simple optics that lets you see energy!, I can see a nuclear power plant through the side of a hill"
To which a Scientist says... mmm that is quite interesting, how does it work?
And the reply is invariably "You wouldn't understand" or "I cannot tell you" and then when asked for a picture of the device working, they say
"If i show you, you will copy it and sell it" or "The powers that be will kill me"
So the statement I made was not really exactly interpreted how I meant it. What you guys tend not to really understand is that while there are a few
egos here and there, they do not command the whole system. Example... There is a neutrino physicist that worked in the same experiment as i did during
my PhD (one out of about 200) who was a complete asshole, seriously the kind of person who just makes you guys sound 100% correct in terms of
scientists being arrogant, sneaky and generally just unapproachable. Seriously a guy who if he offered me a permanent position I would reject.
That guy is 1 out of 200 in a single experiment. So what? I worked on my project in that experiment, he said a few asshole things about us, but we
still completed the work, still published a good paper, and what? did he have any say in it? No because he didn't even belong to our subgroup.
Now there is the point where you think... what happens if someone like this chairs research committees. Well again the point is that when it comes to
funding, these matters are discussed between about 20 people and eventually boiled down. There is no real conspiracy of holding back scientists or
projects based on the egos of one or two people... because those one or two people who were fundamental to establishing many of these topics are
DEAD... they are not here to defend themselves or make statements negative positive or otherwise. There is no truer statement than the following
"No scientific breakthrough was ever made by proving something right. It was always when people were proved wrong when we made the great scientific
The problem truly is that many of these studies and theories that claim such a breakthrough do so without ANY proof at all. And then those that claim
to have proof... a smoking gun... when presented to an actual scientist, really are not proof at all but an example of a person not understanding
their experiment or how to analyze data.
THAT is the problem here.
Iv seen countless people on youtube going on about how they are making power because they are putting 12 volts in and getting 80 volts out... and its
like wow yeah... so what current is being used? and what current is on the other side... because i think you just made a very weird looking inductor
or transformer. Then they just say... "No it is an over-unity device stop trying to suppress me" and then proceed to embroider their argument with
saying tesla a few times.
The only suppression occurring is one of the blind leading the stupid... or is it the other way around... I can never tell. If any one of you who
claims all this actually had any wit about you, you would be engaging scientific institutes, bringing down this broken system from the inside... but
no instead you all just shout and scream from a position where you really have NO experience and yet claim to know exactly everything that is going