It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Witness2008
reply to post by luxordelphi
Perhaps you have already seen the latest from Geoengineering Watch, posting just in case you haven't.
www.youtube.com...
I'm watching it now, incredible.
sunnynights
Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by luxordelphi
The ER-2 goes to 70,00 feet? Gosh - I'd never have realised......if it weren't for the fact that it is a version of the U-2 that NASA has been operating since 1981!
Why didn't you just say you have no point?
Why do you gish-gallop public information as if it was meaningful?
You seem condescending and ridiculing hey?
It’s very obvious you maybe all over the net.
No normal human can do what you appear do for interest only.
Something about you is fishy to me and you don’t add up.
I’ve read your post and you seem to be knowledgeable about military operations that are weather focussed and experimental. Some on human, plants, water, soil, food (Only God Knows how many times this has happened and is going to happen).
You think HAARP a weather modification weapon, Interesting?
Would you say Geo engineering using harmful substances in small isolated areas around the planet could be under military operation with military planes and military contracted planes doing the work of aerial substance release in conjunction with HAARPs, navy, air force?
These three alone can do some damage with all their contractors combined.
Aloysius the Gaul
reply to post by luxordelphi
Adding to the general perception that Erin was nothing of particular interest to New Yorkers in Sept 2001:
Several hundred miles out in the Atlantic, Hurricane Erin—the first Atlantic hurricane of the 2001 season—was weakening as it began to turn toward the north-northeast, away from the East Coast. Though it posed no threat to land, Erin had been producing large swells along local beaches and was one of the main headlines early that morning. In fact, The New York Times weather report on September 11 included a special “Focus” write-up on what it called “Hurricane Day,” explaining how in “9 out of 10 years since 1886, at least one tropical storm or hurricane has raged in the Atlantic on Sept. 11.”
source - emphasis is mine.
post by Aloysius the Gaul
Really - by what measure? Debunking all this nonsense takes little time, and I have a lifelong interest in aviation.
post by Aloysius the Gaul
you cannot do geoengineering in "small isolated areas around the planet" - geo-engineering, BY DEFINITION, is altering the climate OF HET WHOLE PLANET.
Over the past twenty years experiments have been conducted on weather modification, particularly on the effects of seedinq clouds with - such materials as silver iodide crystals. The results are limited.
sunnynights
I966 this was given to NASA.
Regulation and control, Their favourite words
9: There must be regulation and control of weather
modification a c t i v i t i e s , especially as those
a c t i v i t i e s increase i n magnitude and frequency
and become international in scope. This is
required especially to provide a mechanism for
protection a g a i n s t harmful consequences of
weather modification a c t i v i t y b u t a l s e te
permit valid experimentation.
link to Doc
Colorado’s Permitted WM Projects
A permit is required to modify the weather in Colorado. See the Permit Program page for more information about applying for a weather modification permit and the permitting process.
Most of the permitted projects in Colorado are based around ground-based operations with the goal of snowpack augmentation. There also are permits in Weld County and the San Luis Valley for hail cannons for suppression, which uses sound cannons to disrupt cloud processes. More information is available on the Permit Areas page.
sunnynights
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread990821/pg10#pid17566897]
Are your wings clipped? The avatar you use is featherless.
Is that why you are on other debunking chemtrail sites, just curious because I
haven’t notice you on much else
Asking others questions preloading the subject is just your strawman crap.
Go ask the DOD if you really want to know.
But you already do don't you
That is ridiculous featherless bird. Just a whole lots woeful words. Hello! The whole planet has been messed with at one time or another.
The planes in the beginning, some appeared to be testing for balance or crop set ups with small metal tanks, I’m guessing 1000 litres each some bigger 1500-2000 litres But THEN THE ONES with volumes of 10,00 up to 100,00. Massive tankers, that’s not refuelling, No Way. I would think they could hold several hundred thousand tonne. How much would a 747 be able to carry in weight is the question. I will have to go find out.
How does my understanding of contrails and science mean that I am gung-ho for the government?