When you get a stream of negative messages as you have it always indicates to me that you may be on to something. The issue is important enough for those in power to want to suppress it.
improper withholding by the Social Security Administration of records of Harry Bounel, whose Social security number is being illegally used by Barack Obama.
This all but assures that the judge will order the SSA to release the SS-5, Social Security application of resident of CT, Harrison (Harry) Bounel, whose CT SSN 042-68-4425 was stolen by Obama and used in Obama’s 2009 tax returns,
realist wrote:In addition to all the non-lawyering stuff in Orly's rant, which she terms a MSJ, which of course it is not, there is the little factoid that the SSA/Wiggins never said they had any such thing as an SS-5 for a Harrison or Harry Bounel (with or without the J) that they could not release due to privacy issues. What they said was they could not release any information connects with the (now famous) SSN which, of course, is Obama's, a living person.
'Zactly. Or another way of putting it...
Genie: You get three guesses.
Orly: I want the SS-5 that proves Obama has fraudulently used SSN [redacted]...blah...blah...blah.
Genie: You want the President's SS-5? Sorry, you need to obtain his waiver of privacy rights.
Orly: Gimme the SS-5 for [SSN redacted]
Genie: Nope, no can do because it would violate an individual's privacy.
Orly: Then gimme the SS-5 for Hari-San Boon El because (according to blah...blah...blah) Hari-San is at least 120 years old.
Genie: Sorry, no can find.
Orly: But...but...that contradicts what you said when...
Genie: Sorry, but you're out of guesses.
The SSA admitted before that they had the information but wouldn't release it because of privacy...the info is over 120 years old
the judge wants that original application form, then what does Obama do when he had the same EXACT SS NUMBER???
Both Obama and Harry Brunel have used this exact same number
Any further off-topic bickering and insults will result in a posting ban.
The premise of this claim is also flawed in concept, as Barack Obama was born in United States and thus there would have been no reason for his grandmother to appropriate someone else's Social Security number for use by him. (And since non-citizens can legally obtain Social Security numbers the issue is irrelevant, as possession of a Social Security number is not in itself an indicator of citizenship.) Likewise, the claim that Social Security numbers beginning with 042 are "reserved for Connecticut residents" is false. As explained by the Social Security Administration, the area number portion of a SSN does not (and never did) necessarily correspond to the state in which an applicant was born or resides; it simply reflects the mailing address which the applicant has requested his newly issued card be sent to. That mailing address does not have to be the same as the applicant's residence address: it can be the address of a friend, relative, employer, rented post office box, or anyone else authorized to receive mail on his behalf:
This whole claim stems from the fact that a search of a personal information database back in 2011 showed that the name "Harrison J. Bounel" had been mistakenly cross-indexed with Barack Obama's home address and Social Security number. (This type of error is common in such databases and has since been corrected.) Aside from that temporary erroneous entry, there is no evidence whatsoever that Barack Obama ever used the name "Harrison J. Bounel" as an alias, or that Barack Obama's Social Security number was originally issued to someone by that name.
My career in the graphic industry has spanned more than 20 years of both creative and technical in-depth experience. I have a high level of proficiency in not only implementing current technology but in developing and teaching it as well. I specialize in finding solutions at every level of design challenge.
The debacle shines a light on two fatal flaws of the Birther movement: one, their blatantly inconsistent and prejudicial standards of evidence — i.e., they're perfectly willing to accept (and circulate) unsourced photographs of an unvetted document as "proof" of foreign birth, while dismissing out of hand a state-issued, state-validated U.S. birth certificate; and two, what the foregoing reveals about their true motives — i.e, despite their protestations, they are not interested in truth, accuracy, or "protecting the U.S. Constitution," but are bent, rather, on delegitimizing Obama's presidency at any cost and by any means possible.