It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Defragmentor
a reply to: vinifalou
D'oh, love the way this site does its' business with links. Let me try this again
CIA Remote Viewing Document
originally posted by: AdamE
In regards to remote viewing, to me it just seems like another arm of the intelligence gathering apparatus which includes
spy satellites, spies, and cyber warfare. In which they do not rely on just one aspect for mission goals.
originally posted by: Defragmentor
originally posted by: AdamE
In regards to remote viewing, to me it just seems like another arm of the intelligence gathering apparatus which includes
spy satellites, spies, and cyber warfare. In which they do not rely on just one aspect for mission goals.
If they had a mission goal here, what was it? To gather information? You would think the CIA would have a good enough handle on what happened during December 1980—that is, if they were in any way responsible for testing technology or equipment, or if this was down to being a mundane event like a lighthouse flashing. Or were Dames and co. out of the security loop, with no knowledge, and simply curious and dipping their toes in?
Ed Dames was, if anything, proud of his status as a troublemaker within the unit, a maverick who dared venture into unknown realms. But he was also developing another kind of reputation - a reputation for becoming too involved in his monitoring of RV sessions, for pushing the viewer, however unconsciously, towards whatever target description he, Ed Dames, happened to favor. Occasionally Dames knew in advance of the session what the target was, but even when he was "blind" at first, he tended to develop strong opinions as the session went on.
Source : www.ufowatchdog.com...