The 10,000 year old civilization which was more advanced than us, page 18

reply to post by Gazrok

I can see the difficulty you are having. however here's my take on it.

earth is not the site of their 'civilization', merely an outpost. they came here and developed HUMAN civilization. they helped US. this explains the curious mix of high and low technology in ancient sites.

As the legends say: they taught us agriculture, medicine, metallurgy etc. They gave us the tools and blueprints and ability to build temples and houses for them during their stay on earth. This explains why most humans were as the archaeological evidence shows, living in the stoneage/bronze age with no advanced civilization. they had flint and bronze tools; they made pottery and developed basic metallurgy. And chariots. they were NOT advanced. (explains the sudden shift to agriculture: we were taught). (explains sudden development of human thought - artistic ability in the ice age - we were genetically 'assisted'); explains the development of RELIGION - we revered the aliens who taught us things)...

And yet, at the same time this was happening, the 'gods'/aliens, were making little appearances to ancient kings in their ufo ships. (ahura mazda helping darius to win wars; yahweh making the walls of jericho tumble down using trumpets - easy us military can do this today - technolgoy is by very low frequency sound waves i think). Also, the gods were arranging fo rhte construction (by slave labour probly) of their zigurrats (they are shown handing the sumerian kings a ruler and string/or plans to build them); and pyramids - which we probably couldnt replicate today. obviously teh aliens provided the know how to hoist 200 tonne stones into the air to build the valley temple/osireion; and 1000 tonne stones into the air in baalbeck. Possibly some anti gravity/acoustic device. The way they built sacsayhuaman and macchu picchu is also explained as they are known to have possessed a stone cutting tool called the shamir? i think - its described in Hancock's book the sign and the seal. which cut stone like butter and was silent.

So we do have the evidence of high technology in the form of these amazing ruins, which, im sorry to say it, just could not have been built by primitive farmers, and that is the truth of it. as most of the population on the planet really realizes, or the pyramids wouldnt be the object of awe and mystery which they are today. the only persons who seemingly are oblivious to any mystery on this planet are archaeologists..

question: how did farmers with bronze and flint tools build the pyramids? Answer: they didnt nor could they have. not wihtout help. anyone wiht half a brain can see this, in my opinion.

Where is the evidence of this tech civilization? there is an iron pillar in india which does not rust. their metal technology has survived. most metal that we make will be gone in a few years. the antikythera device has survived.

you assume that an advanced race would build skyscrapers? I dont. I think they would be more likely to use natural building materials like stone. i think they would be more likely to build a pyramid. The pyramid is a more amazing and advanced building than any skyscraper we have built. nothing we build will last millenia. everything they built has - and continues to intrigue and confound the best human minds still today. why? very intelligent people were behind these constructions. they built with polygonal masonry that could withstand earthquakes.

while the kings had chariots, the gods had 'flying chariots'. Some are carved on teh wall in abydos seti 1 temple. others are descirbed in teh vedic texts as vimana (with capabilities like ufos).

the goddesses wore spacesuits and helmets - see the BACK VIEW of the 'goddess with a vase' statue of ishtar. And many other carvings - palenque and the god in the jaguar one in mexico; many others von daniken unearthed; as well as the story of bep koropi - who arrived in a flying vehicle with smoke/noise and lived iwth islanders for a while; and they still dress up in reeds made to look like a very convincing space suit..

why was liquid mercury found in so many mexican and chinese tombs?/pyramids? (palenque); and mica - one material known to be able to contain mercury; mica pipes at tiahuanaco; mica tomb in egypt;
rumours of platinum coffins unearthed by japanese in nan madol.

many many many depictions of gods in flying vehicles which match exactly to vimana descriptions in india.
prophets seeing the earth from above.
check out nazca lines on utube. look for the massive'runways' there are THOUSANDS of them. visible only from VERY high above earth.

you say there is no evidence, but i could go on for two days - this planet is crawling with evidence.

vitrification.
libyan desert glass.
radioactive bodies in ancient indian ruins lying in the street.
sodom and gomorrah.
descriptions of nuclear bombs in ramayana.
and missiles/other terrible weapons.

really, i cant be bothered pointing this stuff out to people anymore. if people arent interested enough to read authors like hancock, von daniken, childress, and sitchin and at least go through their evidence carefully before making their minds up, then im not interested in passing on this information to disinterested people.

if someone was interested they would google elongated skulls; then check up on blue/green skinned gods; google the dropa; check out the starchild skull; at least know what modern people say about ufo sightings - so they know that side of the story and can evaluate it for themselves; they would read comments written about ufos by the military; pilots; astronauts and presidents.