It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
cryptorsa1001
The only people who dont believe that Bush did not steal the election in 2000 are the people who voted for him. The proof is out there and has been posted so many times that it doesnt matter if I post it or not. You support Bush and are willing to give up your freedoms to be lulled into a false sense of security. You would not believe the proof I post anyway unless it was from FOX news network.
Originally posted by Cassie Clay
Yes, I'm sure his interest in affecting the election had absolutely *nothing* to do with his demonstrated pattern of trying to shake up governments around the world using extreme financial tactics--tactics which have garnered him countless billions of $$$ (which doesn't hurt, does it?)
George Soros:
*) Does not support Israel
*) Has blamed Jews themselves for Anti-Semitism and has been called an Anti-Semite himself
*) Opposed the reunification of Germany & tried to effect this with his financial policies
*) His financial maneuverings have resulted in massive unemployment & ruin worldwide...he is credited as the man who "Broke The Bank Of England"
*) He has the obsessive goal of creative a utopian "Open Society" that will "shape" the world (as he sees fit).
Oh by the way, the Nazis started as a *Left-Wing* group, dedicated to Socialism, financed by interested outside parties that wished to effect the government as they saw fit--which sounds very familiar. Make no mistake, it's not just the Right that does this crap.
Originally posted by Damned
If you really want to know, sign the petition. If the elections are indeed legit, what can it hurt?
www.moveon.org...
Originally posted by mpeake
The one thing that I have never been able to figure out is this...If Bush is just some dumb, illiterate, honkey tonk, under-acheiving, Texan who rode on his fathers coat tails, then how come he is treated like he is the mastermind behind the greatest and most evil wolrd takeover in history? I never understood how that was possible???
Originally posted by Kidfinger
Just did Maybe something will come of it. Also, what can we do about it? What are your Ideas? If they are too sensitive to post, U2U me. I have some fairly radical views that Im not going to post here.
Originally posted by Damned
There is something we can do, but people have to come to the realization that something needs to be done, first.
cryptorsa1001,
Are you saying that an investigation isn't necessary? Even if you don't believe he stole the presidency, wouldn't an invetigation prove that, if so? Why are you so defiant about investigating the election? The truth should be shown, either way.
[edit on 15-11-2004 by Damned]
I think it is funny when one side loses an election and the first thing they do is cry foul. Reminds me of the kid that said he would take his ball home if he did not get his way on the football field. Moveon.org was clearly in favor of kerry therefore it is hard to say if their outcome form the servey will be biased and false in order to further their cause.
Originally posted by Damned
Unfortunately, the only solution is a revolutionary war. It's gone on too long. We can't count on the government to remove their own corruption. The people must come to the conclusion that something must be done, and they themselves must take action. Until that happens, you might as well sit back and watch your country turn fascist police state.
Originally posted by Kidfinger
cryptorsa1001
The only people who dont believe that Bush did not steal the election in 2000 are the people who voted for him. The proof is out there and has been posted so many times that it doesnt matter if I post it or not.
..............
Originally posted by Gazrok
How do you investigate?
There is no paper trail...and the electronic trail is pretty much in the hands of those who threw it. In areas that didn't use electronic voting, the exit polls matched the votes within the acceptable margin. In areas that DID use the electronic voting, they did not match within that margin. One look at Diebold, and one can see there is definitely something fishy in all of this.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Kid...this has already been covered many times....Bush did not steal the elections in 2000...the evidence is out there but "it doesn't really matter if I post if or not"....the only ones who believe he did, are conspiracy theorists that believe every wild claim there is in the internet...even if it makes no sense...
Originally posted by Galvatron
As Benjamin Franklin once said. Those willing to give up their freedoms for security deserve neither freedom or security.
We have given up our freedoms for security. Therefore we deserve neither.
............
Originally posted by Gazrok
How do you investigate?
There is no paper trail....
Originally posted by Kidfinger
This is a holocost survivor that was willin togive up his entire billion dollar fortune to keep Bush from getting re-elected. If a holocost survivor is saying these things, then I would assume that my view of America becoming a facist state under the rule of Bush, is not that far off the mark.
By the way, BIG THANKS to GoreGrinder He knows what for