It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
And 12 very high-level former intelligence officials wrote the following memorandum to Obama today:
We regret to inform you that some of our former co-workers are telling us, categorically, that contrary to the claims of your administration, the most reliable intelligence shows that Bashar al-Assad was NOT responsible for the chemical incident that killed and injured Syrian civilians on August 21, and that British intelligence officials also know this. In writing this brief report, we choose to assume that you have not been fully informed because your advisers decided to afford you the
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by R_Clark
The problem with 'a source says …' is that there is no way of knowing whether that source exists or indeed the statement is true. Altogether, non-checkable in regard to the proported 'facts' from said 'source'. If you think the intelligence services lie to you, then you must understand the media does too. In regard to Syria, I think both are at it in abounds. The media uses Syria to sell headlines and the intelligence services have their own agenda.edit on 7-9-2013 by LarryLove because: Typo
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by tetra50
I have no doubt that certain factions within G8 governments are operating with an agenda towards Syria, but remember that we, the average Joe, are played constantly — either by profit-driven media outlets, governing bodies or minority factions seeking change through war. The only 'real' perspective we could hope to gain is by putting our own boots to the Syrian ground and seeing the situation from both sides. That would be a great deal more real than relying upon hyperbolic statements from 'sources', government officials or indeed ATS members who seem to have made their minds up already.
Originally posted by Strewth
reply to post by R_Clark
So, if the source is reliable, then the Commander and Chief of the most powerful military the planet has ever seen appears to be having his hand forced into doing the bidding of others.
Those "others" are the real threat to ALL OF HUMANITY.
Given the obvious and brazen absurdity of this situation, as well as many other events of "high strangeness" in the past 3000 years, I am in doubt as to whether those "others" are human.
A big picture is starting to emerge, and the evidence that we are not only alone, but have been invaded and infiltrated as a species, a long time ago, seems the most logical conclusion I am able to draw.
Put ALL of the threads from all of ATS's forums together and this conclusion has merit.
Originally posted by R_Clark
Policy reversal..? The debate fires on... The feedback from this call by TPTW has been fast and brutal.. People are speaking out, Congressmen are growing backbones... People are sick and tired of perpetual war... Now truth is leaking out from all over the internet...
I was sick when Kerry said, Our Islamic friends are payin for the strike..... hmmm
This letter was signed by the following courageous professionals :
For the Steering Group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity
Thomas Drake, Senior Executive, NSA (former)
Philip Giraldi, CIA, Operations Officer (ret.)
Matthew Hoh, former Capt., USMC, Iraq & Foreign Service Officer, Afghanistan
Larry Johnson, CIA & State Department (ret.)
W. Patrick Lang, Senior Executive and Defense Intelligence Officer, DIA (ret.)
David MacMichael, National Intelligence Council (ret.)
Ray McGovern, former US Army infantry/intelligence officer & CIA analyst (ret.)
Elizabeth Murray, Deputy National Intelligence Officer for Middle East (ret.)
Todd Pierce, US Army Judge Advocate General (ret.)
Sam Provance, former Sgt., US Army, Iraq
Coleen Rowley, Division Council & Special Agent, FBI (ret.)
Ann Wright, Col., US Army (ret); Foreign Service Officer (ret.)
www.zerohed ge.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 7-9-2013 by R_Clark because: Grammaredit on 7-9-2013 by R_Clark because: Grammar
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by tetra50
With respect, you do not know whether or not that 'retired source' is real or not or has been fabricated to lend a credence behind the story. That is the problem and as I keep saying on ATS, 'a source says …' means nothing because we have no name to check the story against. Your best tool to insight in this saga is perspective.
Originally posted by LarryLove
reply to post by wrabbit2000
I think saying 'we have taken the side of the monsters' is entirely incorrect. The political nuances within the waring factions in Syria cannot be understood entirely by any of us. You nor me nor (I would bet anyone on ATS) could fathom completely the situation out there. Why? Because we aren't living and eating and breathing and grieving all the atrocities happening in that country. Keyboard detective is one thing; being there yourself is another. That is why I will not rally behind ATS, government nor media sensationalism in this story.